Drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use

Abstract Smart Farming Technologies (SFTs) can improve production output while minimising costs and preserving resources; however, they are scarcely adopted by farmers. In the present study, the factors affecting farmers' intentions to adopt two types of SFTs (Type 1: drones, sensors for data acquisition and automatic download, and agricultural apps; Type 2: agricultural robots and autonomous machines) were investigated within the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), considering the role played by different sources of information, Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), and Perceived Usefulness (PU). A questionnaire assessing the PEU and PU of the two types of SFTs, farmers' previous exposure to different impersonal and personal (formal and informal) sources of information, and farmers' intentions to adopt SFTs was administered to a sample of Italian farmers (n = 314). A mediated model, built on the TAM, showed that the PU affected farmers’ intention to adopt a technology and that personal sources of information, both formal and informal, affected the PU; however, while formal sources increased the PU, informal sources decreased the PU. The model was invariant across the two types of SFTs considered. The implications for the proposal of new technologies are discussed.

[1]  David J. Glasscock,et al.  Psychosocial factors and safety behaviour as predictors of accidental work injuries in farming , 2006 .

[2]  A. Adrian,et al.  Producers' perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies , 2005 .

[3]  James A. Larson,et al.  Adoption and Abandonment of Precision Soil Sampling in Cotton Production , 2008 .

[4]  M. Bavorova,et al.  Adoption of Agri-Environmental Measures by Organic Farmers: The Role of Interpersonal Communication , 2015 .

[5]  B. Erickson,et al.  How does European adoption of precision agriculture compare to worldwide trends? , 2019, Precision agriculture ’19.

[6]  R. G. V. Bramley,et al.  Adoption of variable rate fertiliser application in the Australian grains industry: status, issues and prospects , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[8]  E. Cavallo,et al.  An ergonomic approach to sustainable development: The role of information environment and social‐psychological variables in the adoption of agri‐environmental innovations , 2019, Sustainable Development.

[9]  Štefan Bojnec,et al.  Sustainable participation behaviour in agri-environmental measures , 2016 .

[10]  The effectiveness of an educational intervention to improve knowledge and perceptions for reducing organophosphate pesticide exposure among Indonesian and South Australian migrant farmworkers , 2016, Risk management and healthcare policy.

[11]  L. Klerkx,et al.  Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks , 2019, Journal of Rural Studies.

[12]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[13]  Adriana Bruggeman,et al.  Water pricing and irrigation across Europe: opportunities and constraints for adopting irrigation scheduling decision support systems , 2016 .

[14]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  The Importance of Personal Influence in the Adoption of Technological Changes , 1958 .

[15]  Joanne Sneddon,et al.  Modelling the faddish, fashionable and efficient diffusion of agricultural technologies: A case study of the diffusion of wool testing technology in Australia , 2011 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  L. Klerkx,et al.  Achieving best-fit configurations through advisory subsystems in AKIS: case studies of advisory service provisioning for diverse types of farmers in Norway , 2017 .

[18]  K. Heanue,et al.  The impact of formal agricultural education on farm level innovation and management practices , 2018 .

[19]  Eugenio Cavallo,et al.  Perceptions of Tilt Angles of an Agricultural Tractor , 2014, Journal of agromedicine.

[20]  M. Brosnan.  Modeling technophobia: a case for word processing , 1999 .

[21]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[22]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective , 2004 .

[23]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[24]  Stan G. Daberkow,et al.  Farm and Operator Characteristics Affecting the Awareness and Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies in the US , 2003, Precision Agriculture.

[25]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[26]  M. Reichardt,et al.  Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: results of several surveys among different agricultural target groups , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[27]  T Jafry,et al.  The application of ergonomics in rural development: a review. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems , 2011 .

[29]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[30]  S. Wheeler.  What influences agricultural professionals' views towards organic agriculture? , 2008 .

[31]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[33]  Thomas B. Long,et al.  Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy , 2016 .

[34]  Spyros Fountas,et al.  Farm management information systems: Current situation and future perspectives , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[35]  David Schimmelpfennig,et al.  Farm Profits and Adoption of Precision Agriculture , 2016 .

[36]  Athanasios Ragkos,et al.  Educational needs and perceptions of the sustainability of precision agriculture: survey evidence from Greece , 2018, Precision Agriculture.

[37]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models , 1990 .

[38]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Overall Fit in Covariance Structure Models: Two Types of Sample Size Effects , 1990 .

[39]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  R. Grout,et al.  Non-adoption of environmental innovations in wine growing , 2013 .

[41]  Ludwig Theuvsen,et al.  Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by German crop farmers , 2016, Precision Agriculture.

[42]  Stan G. Daberkow,et al.  INFORMATION AND THE ADOPTION OF PRECISION FARMING TECHNOLOGIES , 2003 .

[43]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Attitudes towards mechanized Cut-to-Length technology among logging contractors in Northern Italy , 2012 .

[44]  Andrea Knierim,et al.  Experience versus expectation: farmers’ perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe , 2019, Precision Agriculture.

[45]  K. Prager,et al.  How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK , 2016 .

[46]  Yeong Sheng Tey,et al.  Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a review for policy implications , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[47]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Human-centered design (HCD) of a fault-finding application for mobile devices and its impact on the reduction of time in fault diagnosis in the manufacturing industry. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[48]  Giacomo Carli,et al.  6 th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2013) Drivers of Precision Agriculture Technologies Adoption: A Literature Review , 2013 .

[49]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine: Theory of planned behaviour , 2007 .

[51]  E. Rogers.  A Prospective and Retrospective Look at the Diffusion Model , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[52]  S. Wolfert,et al.  Big Data in Smart Farming – A review , 2017 .

[53]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Strategies for Business Model Innovation: Challenges and Visual Solutions for Strategic Business Model Innovation , 2013 .

[54]  M. Reichardt,et al.  Dissemination of precision farming in Germany: acceptance, adoption, obstacles, knowledge transfer and training activities , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[55]  Eugenio Cavallo,et al.  Participatory ergonomic design of a safety training tool for migrant workers in agriculture , 2017 .

[56]  J. Manyika,et al.  Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy , 2013 .

[57]  K. Knickel,et al.  Agricultural modernization and sustainable agriculture: contradictions and complementarities , 2017 .

[58]  A. Barnes,et al.  Impact of information transfer on farmers’ uptake of innovative crop technologies: a structural equation model applied to survey data , 2018 .

[59]  L. Prokopy,et al.  Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[60]  E. Cavallo,et al.  It does not occur by chance: a mediation model of the influence of workers’ characteristics, work environment factors, and near misses on agricultural machinery-related accidents , 2017, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[61]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[62]  M. C. García-Cortijo,et al.  Innovation in rural Spain. What drives innovation in the rural-peripheral areas of southern Europe? , 2019, Journal of Rural Studies.

[63]  D. Murphy,et al.  Comprehension rates of safety pictorials affixed to agricultural machinery among Pennsylvania rural population , 2018 .

[64]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  M. Coccia,et al.  Attitudes and Behaviour of Adopters of Technological Innovations in Agricultural Tractors: A Case Study in Italian Agricultural System , 2014 .