Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the Knee

In the past 20 years, there has been considerable growth in the number of knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes from the perspective of the patient. Only a few of these instruments have been evaluated for reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the psychometric evidence of patient-reported outcome measures for the knee and identify the best scores for specific knee conditions. A literature search was performed to retrieve references relating to the development and evaluation of knee-specific instruments. Twenty-four unique instruments were identified, and most have satisfactory evidence for internal (alpha > or = 0.82) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > or = 0.80). Face/content validity was typically assessed during the item selection process, and construct validity was evaluated through strict hypothesis testing or correlations with other clinical measures. For many instruments, effect sizes and standardized response means measuring responsiveness were large (> or = 0.80) within disease-specific populations. Based on the psychometric data, recommendations include the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm Knee Score for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale for anterior knee pain, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, KOOS, and Lysholm Knee Score for focal chondral defects, the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for meniscal injuries, and the KOOS for osteoarthritis (OA). Although the IKDC can be used as a general knee measure, no instrument is currently universally applicable across the spectrum of knee disorders and patient groups. Clinicians and researchers looking to use a patient-based score for measurement of outcomes must consider the specific patient population in which it has been evaluated. Using a diagnostic algorithm that measures the anatomic parts of the knee as separate constructs may solve this dilemma, allowing for measurement of treatment outcomes across patient groups and selection of the optimal clinical intervention.

[1]  A self-administered pain severity scale for patellofemoral pain syndrome , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Four Knee Outcome Scales for Athletic Patients , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[4]  F. Impellizzeri,et al.  Which is the Best Activity Rating Scale for Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  C. Jinks,et al.  A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care (KNEST). 2. Results from a survey in the general population aged 50 and over. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[6]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction A follow-up of 527 patients , 1999, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  C. Jinks,et al.  A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care. 1. Validity and reliability. , 2001, Rheumatology.

[8]  E. Roos,et al.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[9]  J. Richmond,et al.  Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  J. C. Hughston,et al.  Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  D. Felson,et al.  Problems in the development and validation of questionnaire-based screening instruments for ascertaining cases with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: the Framingham Study. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  A. Kirkley,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Quality of Life-Measurement Tool for Patients With Meniscal Pathology: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) , 2007, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[13]  S. Koskinen,et al.  Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  G. Aufdemkampe,et al.  Assessing anterior cruciate ligament injuries: the association and differential value of questionnaires, clinical tests, and functional tests. , 1997, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[15]  A. Anderson,et al.  The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  Marcus K. Taylor,et al.  Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. , 2007, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[17]  K. Bennell,et al.  Outcome measures in patellofemoral pain syndrome: test retest reliability and inter-relationships , 2000 .

[18]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[19]  N. Mohtadi.  Development and Validation of the Quality Of Life Outcome Measure (Questionnaire) for Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  A. Anderson,et al.  Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in Comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in Patients with Focal Articular Cartilage Defects , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Identifying Differential Item Functioning of Rating Scale Items With the Rasch Model: An Introduction and an Application , 2006 .

[22]  R. Kane.  Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research , 1997 .

[23]  D. Fithian,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Knee-Specific and General Health Instruments in Assessing Acute Patellar Dislocation Outcomes , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  C. Terwee,et al.  The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: A validation study , 2008, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[25]  J. Ponterotto,et al.  An Overview of Coefficient Alpha and a Reliability Matrix for Estimating Adequacy of Internal Consistency Coefficients with Psychological Research Measures , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  D. Kennedy,et al.  The lower extremity activity profile: a health status instrument for measuring lower extremity disability. , 1995, Physiotherapy Canada. Physiothérapie Canada.

[27]  D. Hopper,et al.  Test–retest reliability of knee rating scales and functional hop tests one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2002 .

[28]  K. Bennell,et al.  Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Development of the Knee Quality of Life (KQoL-26) 26-item questionnaire: data quality, reliability, validity and responsiveness , 2008, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[30]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  F. Noyes,et al.  Rigorous Statistical Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness Testing of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System in 350 Subjects with Uninjured, Injured, or Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[32]  K. Saleh,et al.  Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  M. Friedman,et al.  Critical Analysis of Knee Ligament Rating Systems , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[34]  D. Saris,et al.  Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[35]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ‐ validation of a Swedish version , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[36]  R. Wright.  Knee Injury Outcomes Measures , 2009, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[37]  S. Smith,et al.  Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain. , 2005, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[38]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale , 1982, The American journal of sports medicine.

[39]  L. Kazis,et al.  Symptom severity of osteoarthritis of the knee: a patient-based measure developed in the veterans health study. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[40]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Activity Rating Scale for Disorders of the Knee , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[41]  A. Carr,et al.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[42]  William G. Rodkey,et al.  The Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[43]  B. Seedhom,et al.  A comparison of the Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scoring questionnaires , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[44]  H. Quinney,et al.  Analysis of outcome measures used in the study of patellofemoral pain syndrome. , 1995, Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada.

[45]  M. F. Macnicol,et al.  The development and validation of the Edinburgh Knee Function Scale: a simple tool for outcome measurement in non-surgical patients , 1999 .

[46]  W. Ettinger,et al.  The evaluation of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: the knee pain scale. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology.

[47]  M. Liang,et al.  American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[48]  A. Tennant,et al.  Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[49]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[50]  R. Marx,et al.  Knee rating scales. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[51]  C. McHorney,et al.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[52]  E. Roos,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in Asians with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[53]  A. Tennant,et al.  Modification and validation of the Lysholm Knee Scale to assess articular cartilage damage. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[54]  M. Kocher,et al.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[55]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[56]  L. March,et al.  Clinical validation of self-reported osteoarthritis. , 1998, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[57]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[58]  M. Salavati,et al.  Validation of a Persian-version of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in Iranians with knee injuries. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[59]  E. Collins,et al.  Evaluation of psychometric properties of Walking Impairment Questionnaire in overweight patients with osteoarthritis of knee. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[60]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[61]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up , 1999, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[62]  R. Marx,et al.  Knee-Specific Quality-of-Life Instruments , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[63]  E. Culham,et al.  Validation of outcome measures in patients with patellofemoral syndrome. , 1989, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[64]  J. Karlsson,et al.  A new instrument for measuring self‐efficacy in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[65]  Richard J Hawkins,et al.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[66]  F. Noyes,et al.  The assessment of work-related activities and limitations in knee disorders , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[67]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Development of a Patient-Reported Measure of Function of the Knee* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[68]  P. Ferreira,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.