Sustainable Maintenance Strategy Under Uncertainty in the Lifetime Distribution of Deteriorating Assets

In the life-cycle management of systems under continuous deterioration, studying the sensitivity analysis of the optimised preventive maintenance decisions with respect to the changes in the model parameters is of a great importance. Since the calculations of the mean cost rates considered in the preventive maintenance policies are not sufficiently robust, the corresponding maintenance model can generate outcomes that are not robust and this would subsequently require interventions that are costly. This chapter presents a computationally efficient decision-theoretic sensitivity analysis for a maintenance optimisation problem for systems/structures/assets subject to measurable deterioration using the Partial Expected Value of Perfect Information (PEVPI) concept. Furthermore, this sensitivity analysis approach provides a framework to quantify the benefits of the proposed maintenance/replacement strategies or inspection schedules in terms of their expected costs and in light of accumulated information about the model parameters and aspects of the system, such as the ageing process. In this paper, we consider random variable model and stochastic Gamma process model as two well-known probabilistic models to present the uncertainty associated with the asset deterioration. We illustrate the use of PEVPI to perform sensitivity analysis on a maintenance optimisation problem by using two standard preventive maintenance policies, namely age-based and condition-based maintenance policies. The optimal strategy of the former policy is the time of replacement or repair and the optimal strategies of the later policy are the inspection time and the preventive maintenance ratio. These optimal strategies are determined by minimising the corresponding expected cost rates for the given deterioration models’ parameters, total cost and replacement or repair cost. The robust optimised strategies to the changes of the models’ parameters can be determined by evaluating PEVPI’s which involves the computation of multi-dimensional integrals and is often computationally demanding, and conventional numerical integration or Monte Carlo simulation techniques would not be helpful. To overcome this computational difficulty, we approximate the PEVPI using Gaussian process emulators.

[1]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Calculating Partial Expected Value of Perfect Information via Monte Carlo Sampling Algorithms , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2]  R. Dekker,et al.  A useful framework for optimal replacement models , 1997 .

[3]  Athena Zitrou,et al.  Robustness of maintenance decisions: Uncertainty modelling and value of information , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[5]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Sustainability of Strategic Information Systems in Emergent vs. Prescriptive Strategic Management , 2015, Int. J. Organ. Collect. Intell..

[6]  Richard E. Barlow,et al.  Stochastic Ageing and Dependence for Reliability , 2006 .

[7]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[8]  Arjan S. Dijkstra,et al.  Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  J. Elkington Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[10]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Multi-parameter maintenance optimisation via the marginal cost approach , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[12]  Hongzhou Wang,et al.  A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  H. Pham,et al.  Invited reviewImperfect maintenance , 1996 .

[14]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayes–Hermite quadrature , 1991 .

[16]  J. Rougier Efficient Emulators for Multivariate Deterministic Functions , 2008 .

[17]  M. Kijima SOME RESULTS FOR REPAIRABLE SYSTEMS WITH GENERAL REPAIR , 1989 .

[18]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[19]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian emulation of complex multi-output and dynamic computer models , 2010 .

[20]  M. Berg A marginal cost analysis for prevetive replacement policies , 1980 .

[21]  M. D. Pandey,et al.  The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures , 2009 .

[22]  Tim Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  A. H. Christer,et al.  A delay-time-based maintenance model of a multi-component system , 1995 .

[24]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Rommert Dekker A review of multi-component maintenance models , 2007 .

[26]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Adriana Hornikova,et al.  Stochastic Ageing and Dependence for Reliability , 2007, Technometrics.

[28]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[29]  A. OHagan,et al.  Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[31]  Ross B. Corotis,et al.  INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR WITH PARTIAL OBSERVABILITY , 1995 .

[32]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Optimal continuous-wear limit replacement under periodic inspections , 1988 .

[33]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Decision-Theoretic Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Computer Models , 2009, Technometrics.