Show me your phone, I will tell you who your friends are: analyzing smartphone data to identify social relationships

Access control is a key principle to protect user privacy online. The combination of both the wealth of user-generated data in online social networks and overly complex user interfaces lead to a high user burden for privacy control, hence making the observance of the above principles difficult. We investigate how communication metadata on smartphones can facilitate providing tailored suggestions for restricted audience groups, thus limiting the sharing of data to the intended users only. To this end, we have performed a user study collecting a dataset including contact names, calls, SMS, MMS, and e-mail on personal smartphones in everyday use. In this paper, we examine which are the key features determining the social relationship category of a contact using machine learning. We obtain promising results for an automated classification of contacts into work-related, family-related and other social-interaction-related, thus enabling the possibility of user assistance for privacy control. Obtaining a more fine-grained categorization of the latter category into acquaintances, friends, and university-mates is shown to be difficult, since these categories blur in our study group.

[1]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  FriendSensing: recommending friends using mobile phones , 2009, RecSys '09.

[2]  Yang Wang,et al.  "I regretted the minute I pressed share": a qualitative study of regrets on Facebook , 2011, SOUPS.

[3]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[5]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[6]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[7]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Ashkan Sami,et al.  Mining Friendship from Cell-Phone Switch Data , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Human-Centric Computing.

[9]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  An Investigation into Facebook Friend Grouping , 2011, INTERACT.

[10]  Steven M. Bellovin,et al.  Facebook and privacy: it's complicated , 2012, SOUPS.

[11]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Mining smartphone data to classify life-facets of social relationships , 2013, CSCW.

[12]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Scale-free topology of e-mail networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[14]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[15]  Matthias Hollick,et al.  Can I Help You Setting Your Privacy? A Survey-based Exploration of Users' Attitudes towards Privacy Suggestions , 2015, MoMM.

[16]  Kristen LeFevre,et al.  Privacy wizards for social networking sites , 2010, WWW '10.

[17]  John Zimmerman,et al.  "You Never Call, You Never Write": Call and SMS Logs Do Not Always Indicate Tie Strength , 2015, CSCW.

[18]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Are you close with me? are you nearby?: investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[19]  Ole J. Mengshoel,et al.  The Impact of Social Affinity on Phone Calling Patterns: Categorizing Social Ties from Call Data Records , 2012, SNA-KDD 2012.