The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity

The word length effect is the finding that short items are remembered better than long items on immediate serial recall tests. The time-based word length effect refers to this finding when the lists comprise items that vary only in pronunciation time. Three experiments compared recall of three different sets of disyllabic words that differed systematically only in spoken duration. One set showed a word length effect, one set showed no effect of word length, and the third showed a reverse word length effect, with long words recalled better than short. A new fourth set of words was created, and it also failed to yield a time-based word length effect. Because all four experiments used the same methodology and varied only the stimulus sets, it is argued that the time-based word length effect is not robust and as such poses problems for models based on the phonological loop.

[1]  J. F. Mackworth The duration of the visual image. , 1963 .

[2]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[4]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[5]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory. , 1992 .

[7]  G. Waters,et al.  Articulatory and Phonological Determinants of Word Length Effects in Span Tasks , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Richardson,et al.  Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[9]  G. Waters,et al.  Articulatory Length and Phonological Similarity in Span Tasks: A Reply to Baddeley and Andrade , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  I Neath,et al.  Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[12]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Modeling Item Length Effects in Memory Span: No Rehearsal Needed? , 1995 .

[13]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect , 1997 .

[14]  Elisabet Service,et al.  The Effect of Word Length on Immediate Serial Recall Depends on Phonological Complexity, Not Articulatory Duration , 1998 .

[15]  B A Dosher,et al.  Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[18]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  N. Cowan,et al.  Is There a Temporal Basis of the Word Length Effect? A Response to Service (1998) , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  S E Avons,et al.  The Word-length Effect and Disyllabic Words , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  E. Service Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: different paradigms answer different questions. A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  S. E. Avons,et al.  Output Decay in Immediate Serial Recall: Speech Time Revisited ☆ , 2002 .