Underutilization of Supplemental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Among Patients at High Breast Cancer Risk.

BACKGROUND Women at high lifetime breast cancer risk may benefit from supplemental breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening, in addition to routine mammography screening for earlier cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study of 422,406 women undergoing routine mammography screening across 86 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) facilities during calendar year 2012. We determined availability and use of on-site screening breast MRI services based on woman-level characteristics, including >20% lifetime absolute risk using the National Cancer Institute risk assessment tool. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine sociodemographic characteristics associated with on-site screening MRI use. RESULTS Overall, 43.9% (2403/5468) of women at high lifetime risk attended a facility with on-site breast MRI screening availability. However, only 6.6% (158/2403) of high-risk women obtained breast MRI screening within a 2-year window of their screening mammogram. Patient factors associated with on-site MRI screening use included younger (<40 years) age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-4.21), family history (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.13-2.63), prior breast biopsy (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.22-3.58), and postsecondary education (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.74). CONCLUSIONS While nearly half of women at high lifetime breast cancer risk undergo routine screening mammography at a facility with on-site breast MRI availability, supplemental breast MRI remains widely underutilized among those who may benefit from earlier cancer detection. Future studies should evaluate whether other enabling factors such as formal risk assessment and patient awareness of high lifetime breast cancer risk can mitigate the underutilization of supplemental screening breast MRI.

[1]  A. Howell,et al.  Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: Analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[2]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  David A Mankoff,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[4]  R. Schwab,et al.  Participation of low-income women in genetic cancer risk assessment and BRCA 1/2 testing: the experience of a safety-net institution , 2015, Journal of Community Genetics.

[5]  S. Jackson,et al.  Breast cancer risk assessment in 64,659 women at a single high-volume mammography clinic. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[6]  A. Howell,et al.  Surveillance for familial breast cancer: Differences in outcome according to BRCA mutation status , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[7]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Geographic access to breast imaging for US women. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  Elena B. Elkin,et al.  Geographic Access and the Use of Screening Mammography , 2010, Medical care.

[9]  E. Demidenko,et al.  Influence of NCI Cancer Center Attendance on Mortality in Lung, Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients , 2009, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[10]  K. Yabroff,et al.  Is provider type associated with cancer screening and prevention: advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants, and physicians , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[11]  A. Groarke,et al.  Can risk and illness perceptions predict breast cancer worry in healthy women? , 2016, Journal of health psychology.

[12]  S. Taplin,et al.  Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women. , 2008, Journal of women's health.

[13]  J. Klijn,et al.  Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  R. Gatenby,et al.  Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. , 2013, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  Daniel W. Goldberg,et al.  Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Is Travel Time Important? , 2011, Journal of Community Health.

[16]  Jennifer S. Haas,et al.  Is the closest facility the one actually used? An assessment of travel time estimation based on mammography facilities , 2016, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[17]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[18]  E. Sickles The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[19]  A Howell,et al.  Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme , 2003, Journal of medical genetics.

[20]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Maximizing Value Through Innovations in Radiologist-Driven Communications in Breast Imaging. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  E. Perez-stable,et al.  Perceived risk of breast cancer among women at average and increased risk. , 2005, Journal of women's health.

[22]  S. Gregorich,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Options: Awareness, Discussion, and Use among Women from Four Ethnic Groups , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[23]  L. Esserman,et al.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment , 2010 .

[24]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. , 2007, Radiology.

[25]  Theo van der Kwast,et al.  A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false‐negative mammography , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[26]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[28]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status , 2016, Cancer.

[29]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[30]  Wendie A Berg,et al.  Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  L. Bégin,et al.  Primary node negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers has a poor outcome. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[32]  Emily White,et al.  Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[34]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density. , 2017, The Medical clinics of North America.

[35]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[36]  S. Taplin,et al.  Breast MRI Use Uncommon among U.S. Women , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.