Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from low-dose CBCT images

Objectives: To propose a reliable and practical method for automatically segmenting the mandible from low-dose CBCT images. Methods: The marker-based watershed transform is a region-growing approach that dilates or 9floods9 predefined markers onto a height map whose ridges denote object boundaries. We applied this method to segment the mandible from the rest of the CBCT image. The height map was generated to enhance the sharp decreases of intensity at the mandible/tissue border and suppress noise by computing the intensity gradient image of the CBCT itself. Two sets of markers, 9mandible9 and 9background9 were automatically placed inside and outside the mandible, respectively in a novel image using image registration. The watershed transform flooded the gradient image by dilating the markers simultaneously until colliding at watershed lines, estimating the mandible boundary. CBCT images of 20 adolescent subjects were chosen as test cases. Segmentation accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by measuring overlap (Dice similarity coefficient) and boundary agreement against a well-accepted interactive segmentation method described in the literature. Results: The Dice similarity coefficient was 0.97 +/- 0.01 (mean +/- SD), indicating almost complete overlap between the automatically and the interactively segmented mandibles. Boundary deviations were predominantly under 1mm for most of the mandibular surfaces. The errors were mostly from bones around partially erupted wisdom teeth, the condyles and the dental enamels, which had minimal impact on the overall morphology of the mandible. Conclusions: The marker-based watershed transform method produces segmentation accuracy comparable to the well-accepted interactive segmentation approach.

[1]  Weisi Lin,et al.  A new marker-based watershed algorithm , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37512).

[2]  Eric A. Hoffman,et al.  Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Zainul Ahmad Rajion,et al.  Comparison of 3D reconstruction of mandible for pre-operative planning using commercial and open-source software , 2016 .

[4]  Jian Chen,et al.  Brain extraction using the watershed transform from markers , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[5]  L Leija,et al.  Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation. , 2009, Medical physics.

[6]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  Fully automatic shape constrained mandible segmentation from cone-beam CT data , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[7]  Anil Kumar Nagarajappa,et al.  Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image , 2015, Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry.

[8]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Marker-controlled watershed for lymphoma segmentation in sequential CT images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[9]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic open-source algorithmic software segmentation of the mandibular bone: Practical feasibility and assessment of a new course of action , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  Shu Liao,et al.  Automated bone segmentation from dental CBCT images using patch-based sparse representation and convex optimization. , 2014, Medical physics.

[11]  Kan Jiang,et al.  A novel white blood cell segmentation scheme using scale-space filtering and watershed clustering , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.03EX693).

[12]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[13]  Stefan Zachow,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Mandibular Nerve and Bone from Cone-Beam CT Data , 2009, MICCAI.

[14]  Richard Beare A locally constrained watershed transform , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Sven Kreiborg,et al.  4D Shape-Preserving Modeling of Bone Growth , 1998, MICCAI.

[16]  Yaozong Gao,et al.  Automated segmentation of dental CBCT image with prior-guided sequential random forests. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  Geoffrey McLennan,et al.  Three-dimensional human airway segmentation methods for clinical virtual bronchoscopy. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[18]  Michael P. Kelly,et al.  Characterizing mandibular growth using three-dimensional imaging techniques and anatomic landmarks. , 2017, Archives of oral biology.

[19]  D. Enlow,et al.  A study of the postnatal growth of the human mandible , 1964 .

[20]  Tamer M. Nassef,et al.  New Segmentation Approach to Extract Human Mandible Bones Based on Actual Computed Tomography Data , 2012 .

[21]  Martin Styner,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[22]  L. Cevidanes,et al.  Mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP: A 3-D preliminary assessment. , 2017, The Angle orthodontist.