The effect of prosodic weakening on the production and perception of trans-consonantal vowel coarticulation in German.

The present study considers whether coarticulation in production and its relationship to categorization could provide a synchronic basis for the prevalence of sound change in unstressed syllables. The size of V2-on-V1 coarticulation in the production of /pV1pV2l/ non-words (V1 = /U,Y/ and V2 = /e, o/) produced by German speakers and with stress falling either on the first or second syllable was compared with forced-choice perceptual categorization of resynthesized versions of these non-words. In speech production, /Y/ but not /U/ was perturbed by anticipatory V2-on-V1 coarticulation. Stress had no influence on coarticulation but caused target undershoot in /U/. The same speakers compensated for coarticulation in perception: however, in the unstressed context the speakers compensated less and their diminished compensatory coarticulation was shown to be linked to /U/-undershoot. Taken together, these results point to a mismatch between coarticulation and categorization that is suggested as a possible source of sound change: whereas de-stressing did not affect V2-on-V1 coarticulation in production, it weakened V2's influence on perceptual /ʊ-Y/ categorization. The evidence that this mismatch is indirectly caused by stress-dependent reduction in /U/ that is unrelated to the V2-source of the coarticulation is also consistent with a model of sound change as non-teleological.

[1]  J. Ohala,et al.  Phonetic Explanations for the Development of Tones , 1979 .

[2]  Jennifer Hay,et al.  Modelling sociophonetic variation , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[3]  Pascal Perrier,et al.  The gestural approach to syllable structure: Universal, language- and cluster-specific aspects , 2012 .

[4]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Ohala.  The listener as a source of sound change , 2012 .

[6]  Jennifer Cole,et al.  Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[7]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[8]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones , 1989, Speech Commun..

[9]  Dick R. van Bergem,et al.  A model of coarticulatory effects on the schwa , 1994, Speech Commun..

[10]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Development of exploratory research tools based on TANDEM-STRAIGHT , 2009 .

[11]  Christine Mooshammer,et al.  Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German , 2008, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[12]  John J. Ohala.  Sound change as nature's speech perception experiment , 1993, Speech Commun..

[13]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.

[14]  José Ignacio Hualde,et al.  Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization , 2011 .

[15]  J. Harrington,et al.  Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.

[17]  M. Beckman,et al.  The Interaction of Coarticulation and Prosody in Sound Change , 1992, Language and speech.

[18]  John Local,et al.  Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[19]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J. Salmons,et al.  Umlautless Residues in Germanic , 1997, American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures.

[21]  Maria-Josep Solé,et al.  Natural and unnatural patterns of sound change , 2012 .

[22]  Xu Shao,et al.  Clean speech reconstruction from MFCC vectors and fundamental frequency using an integrated front-end , 2006, Speech Commun..

[23]  H. Fujisaka,et al.  Analysis, recognition and perception of voiceless fricative consonants in Japanese , 1976, ICASSP.

[24]  J. Harrington,et al.  The Relationship between the Perception and Production of Coarticulation during a Sound Change in Progress , 2012, Language and speech.

[25]  G. K. Iverson,et al.  BLOCKING ENVIRONMENTS IN OLD HIGH GERMAN UMLAUT , 1994 .

[26]  S. Manuel.  Coarticulation: Cross-language studies: relating language-particular coarticulation patterns to other language-particular facts , 1999 .

[27]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[28]  Klaus J. Kohler.  Articulatory dynamics of vowels and consonants in speech communication , 2001, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[29]  S. Zahorian,et al.  Dynamic spectral shape features as acoustic correlates for initial stop consonants , 1991 .

[30]  James D. Harnsberger,et al.  Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[31]  J. Ohala,et al.  Listeners’ Normalization of Vowel Quality Is Influenced by ‘Restored’ Consonantal Context , 1994 .

[32]  C A Fowler,et al.  Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  P. S. Beddor.  A Coarticulatory Path to Sound Change , 2009 .

[34]  B H Repp,et al.  Influence of Vocalic Context on Perception of the [j [s] Distinction: Ii. Spectral Factors , 2022 .

[35]  P. J. Alfonso,et al.  Dynamics of Vowel Articulation , 1982 .

[36]  W. Labov.  Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors , 1994 .

[37]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  Christoph Draxler,et al.  SpeechRecorder - a Universal Platform Independent Multi-Channel Audio Recording Software , 2004, LREC.

[39]  B. Lindblom.  Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[40]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Coarticulation : A universal phonetic phenomenon with roots in deep time , 2011 .

[41]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: effects of coarticulation resistance , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[42]  Jan Henning Schulze.  Der i-Umlaut im Althochdeutschen. Theorie, Phonetik und Typologie sowie eine optimalitätstheoretische Analyse , 2010 .

[43]  S. Ohman.  Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Jules D. Gliesche.  Review of Principles of Linguistic Change: Social factors , 2005 .

[45]  M. Beckman,et al.  Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English , 2001 .

[46]  Florian Schiel,et al.  MAUS Goes Iterative , 2004, LREC.

[47]  J. G. Martin,et al.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop consonant-bowel sequences. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  M. Huffman.  Modulation of speech gestures through prosody or sound change: A commentary , 2012 .

[49]  P. Mermelstein,et al.  Speech sounds and features , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[50]  K. Stevens,et al.  Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. , 1963, Journal of speech and hearing research.