Effect of dual screws across the vertebral neurocentral synchondrosis on spinal canal development in an immature spine: a porcine model.

BACKGROUND Questions remain as to the effect of pedicle screws on spinal canal development in young children. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of unilateral placement of dual screws across the neurocentral synchondrosis on spinal canal development as assessed with histological analysis and measurement of the canal dimensions in an immature pig model. METHOD Twenty-seven one-month-old pigs were assigned to two groups on the basis of the surgical approach used to place unilateral double screws that did or did not cross the neurocentral synchondrosis. In one group, sixteen pigs underwent a posterior approach from T7 to T14 and were divided into four subgroups: no screws (without screw fixation), short screws (dual pedicle screws that did not cross the neurocentral synchondrosis), long screws (dual pedicle screws that crossed the neurocentral synchondrosis), and screw removal (long dual pedicle screws that were removed at six weeks postoperatively). In the other group, eleven pigs underwent an anterior approach, with double vertebral body screws placed via thoracotomy. These animals were divided into two subgroups: short screws (dual vertebral body screws that did not cross the neurocentral synchondrosis) and long screws (dual vertebral screws that crossed the neurocentral synchondrosis). All animals were killed at seventeen weeks. The total area, width, and depth of the spinal canal were measured on axial computed tomography (CT) images. Quantitative histological analysis was performed to measure the rate of neurocentral synchondrosis closure. RESULTS Use of unilateral double pedicle screws across the neurocentral synchondrosis through a posterior approach resulted in 97% neurocentral synchondrosis closure with a 20% decrease in the canal area and a 15% decrease in the canal depth. Use of unilateral double vertebral body screws across the neurocentral synchondrosis through an anterior approach resulted in 71% neurocentral synchondrosis closure with a 15% decrease in the canal area and an 8% decrease in the canal width. CONCLUSIONS Unilateral double pedicle screws crossing the neurocentral synchondrosis adversely affected spinal canal growth in immature pigs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Pedicle screws should be used with caution in very young children, and a delay in surgical treatment until they are older should be considered.

[1]  M. Yazici,et al.  The Effect of Pedicle Screw Insertion at a Young Age on Pedicle and Canal Development , 2012, Spine.

[2]  A. Mannion,et al.  Prospective study of the effect of pedicle screw placement on development of the immature vertebra in an in vivo porcine model , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[3]  S. Suk Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Insertion Technique, the Fusion Levels and Direct Vertebral Rotation , 2011, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[4]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Neurocentral Synchondrosis Screws to Create and Correct Experimental Deformity: A Pilot Study , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  P. Nurenberg,et al.  Morphometric Analysis of Neurocentral Synchondrosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Normal Skeletally Immature Spine , 2010, Spine.

[6]  A. Alanay,et al.  The Effect of Anterior Spinal Fusion on Spinal Canal Development in an Immature Porcine Model , 2009, Spine.

[7]  Richard M Schwend,et al.  Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Improvement Over Hook/Hybrid Fixation , 2009, Spine.

[8]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Unilateral pedicle screw epiphysiodesis of the neurocentral synchondrosis. Production of idiopathic-like scoliosis in an immature animal model. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Moe R. Lim,et al.  Measurement Error of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Range of Motion , 2006, Spine.

[10]  A. Alanay,et al.  The Effect of Pedicle Screw Placement With or Without Application of Compression Across the Neurocentral Cartilage on the Morphology of the Spinal Canal and Pedicle in Immature Pigs , 2005, Spine.

[11]  M. Moreau,et al.  Evaluating MRI as a Technique for Visualizing the Neurocentral Junction , 2005, Spine.

[12]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Versus Hook Instrumentation in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2004, Spine.

[13]  J. Harms,et al.  Pedicle Screws in 1- and 2-Year-Old Children: Technique, Complications, and Effect on Further Growth , 2002, Spine.

[14]  M. Moreau,et al.  MRI characteristics of the neurocentral synchondrosis , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[15]  D. Mason,et al.  Age of closure of the neurocentral cartilage in the thoracic spine. , 1998, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[16]  E. L. van Persijn van Meerten,et al.  Postnatal Development and Structure of the Neurocentral Junction: Its Relevance for Spinal Surgery , 1996, Spine.

[17]  N. Grenier,et al.  The neurocentral vertebral cartilage: Anatomy, physiology and physiopathology , 1989, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[18]  H. Piggott Growth modification in the treatment of scoliosis. , 1987, Orthopedics.

[19]  J. Taylor,et al.  Scoliosis and growth. Patterns of asymmetry in normal vertebral growth. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  R ROAF,et al.  Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  D. Lim,et al.  Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[22]  J. Cañadell,et al.  Experimental scoliosis by epiphysiodesis in pigs , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[23]  E. Bywaters,et al.  Illustrated glossary for spinal anatomy , 2004, Rheumatology International.

[24]  H. Ottander Experimental Progressive Scoliosis in a Pig , 1963 .