A conceptual framework for comparing species assemblages in native and exotic habitats

Exotic (nonnative) species are known to have a wide variety of impacts on native biota. One potential set of impacts that have been poorly studied are the effects of replacing native habitat-providing species with exotic ones, e.g. when native trees that compose a woodland are replaced by an exotic tree plantation. Here we develop a graphical model that can be used to explore how multiple taxonomic components (such as birds, mammals and plants) respond to such changes. We suggest that four categorical responses are possible, with respect to changes in species richness (or other quantitative measures) of taxonomic groups within species assemblages. First, that each taxonomic group compared between habitats will be relatively unchanged, e.g. have equivalent values of species richness. Second, that a decrease (for example in species richness) of one group will be compensated for by an increase (in species richness) of another group. Third, that one or more groups will decrease without any compensated increases in other groups. Fourth, that one or more groups will increase without any compensated decreases in other groups. We provide empirical support for 3 of these 4 responses, with respect to measures of species richness, with much evidence for equivalency between habitats. These types of comparisons should provide a valuable tool for evaluating 1) the efficacy of environmental mitigation efforts that artificially create or restore habitats and 2) the types of changes that have occurred over time or across space as native habitat-producing species are replaced by exotic ones. Finally, this conceptual framework should help to broaden the range of possible changes considered by ecologists who study the impacts of exotic species.

[1]  M. Seddon,et al.  Land-snail faunas in indigenous rainforest and commercial forestry plantations in Kakamega Forest, western Kenya , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[2]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  The paradox of invasion , 2000 .

[4]  L. M. Ellis.  Bird use of saltcedar and cottonwood vegetation in the Middle Rio Grande Valley of New Mexico, U.S.A.* , 1995 .

[5]  A. Choudhury,et al.  Helminth communities of native and introduced fishes in Lake Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México , 2000 .

[6]  M. Mack,et al.  Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  James H Brown,et al.  Species Invasions Exceed Extinctions on Islands Worldwide: A Comparative Study of Plants and Birds , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[8]  David Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion , 2002, Nature.

[9]  S. Gaines,et al.  Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[11]  F. Sheldon,et al.  Use of an Exotic Tree Plantation by Bornean Lowland Forest Birds , 1993 .

[12]  J. Lockwood,et al.  Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Mark A. Davis.  Biotic Globalization: Does Competition from Introduced Species Threaten Biodiversity? , 2003 .

[14]  T. Ebenhard.  Introduced birds and mammals and their ecological effects , 1988 .

[15]  Mikko Vähäsöyrinki,et al.  Introduced species and their missing parasites , 2003 .

[16]  T. Fritts,et al.  THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam1 , 1998 .

[17]  C. Crawford,et al.  Surface-active arthropod communities in native and exotic riparian vegetation in the Middle Rio Grande valley, New Mexico. , 2000 .

[18]  J. P. Sousa,et al.  Effects of introduced exotic tree species on Collembola communities: the importance of management techniques. , 1997 .

[19]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States , 2000 .

[20]  X. Montaudouin,et al.  The proliferating Gastropoda Crepidula fornicata may stimulate macrozoobenthic diversity , 1999, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[21]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[22]  J. Castilla,et al.  Marine ecosystem engineering by the alien ascidian Pyura praeputialis on a mid-intertidal rocky shore , 2004 .

[23]  R. Keenan,et al.  Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in Northern Australia , 1997 .

[24]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[25]  D. Sax.  Native and naturalized plant diversity are positively correlated in scrub communities of California and Chile , 2002 .

[26]  R. Viejo.  Mobile epifauna inhabiting the invasive Sargassum muticum and two local seaweeds in northern Spain , 1999 .

[27]  D. Sax.  Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species : implications for biogeography , 2001 .

[28]  J. Crooks.  Habitat alteration and community-level effects of an exotic mussel, Musculista senhousia , 1998 .

[29]  J. Lockwood.  Using Taxonomy to Predict Success among Introduced Avifauna: Relative Importance of Transport and Establishment , 1999 .

[30]  M. Rejmánek.  A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch , 1996 .

[31]  G. Friend.  Mammal populations In exotic pine plantations and indigenous eucalypt forests in Gippsland, Victoria , 1982 .

[32]  F. Forcella,et al.  Colonization potentials of alien weeds are related to their 'native' distributions: Implications for plant quarantine. , 1984 .

[33]  L. Kriwoken,et al.  Exotic species and estuaries : managing Spartina anglica in Tasmania, Australia , 2000 .

[34]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Determinants of geographical range sizes: a test using introduced New Zealand birds , 1999 .

[35]  D. Sax.  Equal diversity in disparate species assemblages : a comparison of native and exotic woodlands in California , 2002 .

[36]  L. Kriwoken,et al.  Evidence for effects of Spartina anglica invasion on benthic macrofauna in Little Swanport estuary, Tasmania , 2000 .

[37]  J. Springett.  The effect of planting Pinus pinaster Ait. on populations of soil microarthropods and on litter decomposition at Gnangara, Western Australia , 1976 .

[38]  D. Simberloff.  COMMUNITY EFFECTS OF INTRODUCED SPECIES , 1981 .

[39]  M. H. Nitecki.  Biotic crises in ecological and evolutionary time , 1981 .

[40]  R. N. Mack.  Phylogenetic Constraint, Absent Life Forms, and Preadapted Alien Plants: A Prescription for Biological Invasions , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[41]  Julian D Olden,et al.  Toward a Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction of Biotic Homogenization , 2003, The American Naturalist.