Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans

Abstract. Anuran reproduction is influenced by various biotic and abiotic factors, of which temperature and rainfall are the best studied. Here we examine the relationship between multiple abiotic environmental variables – specifically, air and water temperature, rainfall, barometric pressure, relative humidity and wind velocity – and the calling activity of five species (Rana sylvatica, Pseudacris crucifer, Bufo americanus, Rana clamitans, and Rana catesbeiana) in an anuran community in New Brunswick, Canada. Acoustical and environmental data were sampled hourly for 4 months during the breeding season in 1997. Logistic regression analyses indicated that each species responded to a unique combination of meteorological variables, even when calling concurrently. Calling in the spring breeding species, R. sylvatica, P. crucifer, and B. americanus, was most associated with the time of day (i.e., they called primarily at night), while calling in the summer breeding species, R. clamitans and R. catesbeiana, was associated primarily with high water temperature. Species with short breeding periods (i.e., explosive breeders; R. sylvatica, B. americanus) responded to fewer environmental variables than did species with prolonged breeding periods (P. crucifer, R. clamitans, R. catesbeiana). Prolonged breeding species responded differently to climatic variables throughout the breeding season: during the latter half of their calling periods, the time of day and a variable that predicts rain, i.e., barometric pressure, became more important, and water temperature became less important.

[1]  S. Salthe,et al.  5 – REPRODUCTIVE AND COURTSHIP PATTERNS , 1974 .

[2]  Salvatore J. Zimmitti.  Individual Variation in Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Features Associated with Calling in Spring Peepers (Pseudacris crucifer) , 1999, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[3]  H. J. Blankenhorn,et al.  Meteorological variables affecting onset and duration of calling in Hyla arborea L. and Bufo calamita calamita Laur , 1972, Oecologia.

[4]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[5]  E. Bellis.  The Influence of Humidity on Wood Frog Activity , 1962 .

[6]  R. D. Howard.  THE EVOLUTION OF MATING STRATEGIES IN BULLFROGS, RANA CATESBEIANA , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  T. Kusano,et al.  Factors affecting breeding activity in a stream-breeding frog, Buergeria buergeri , 1992 .

[8]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[9]  C. Harris.  Absorption of Sound in Air versus Humidity and Temperature , 1966 .

[10]  Christopher G. Murphy.  NIGHTLY TIMING OF CHORUSING BY MALE BARKING TREEFROGS (HYLA GRATIOSA) : THE INFLUENCE OF FEMALE ARRIVAL AND ENERGY , 1999 .

[11]  J. A. Moore,et al.  Temperature Tolerance and Rates of Development in the Eggs of Amphibia , 1939 .

[12]  R. Goris,et al.  Current Herpetology in East Asia , 1990 .

[13]  R. M. Nally.  On the reproductive energetics of chorusing males: Costs and patterns of call production in two sympatric species of Ranidella (Anura) , 1984 .

[14]  Dianne B. Seale,et al.  Physical Factors Influencing Oviposition by the Woodfrog, Rana sylvatica, in Pennsylvania , 1982 .

[15]  R. D. Howard.  Mating behaviour and mating success in woodfrogs Rana sylvatica , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  J. R. Bider,et al.  Seasonal activity of the toad Bufo americanus in southern Quebec as revealed by a sand-transect technique , 1974 .

[17]  H. Obert.  Some effects of external factors upon the reproductive behavior of the grass frog Rana t. temporaria L. (Ranidae, Anura) , 1976, Oecologia.

[18]  S. Emlen.  Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog , 1976, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  C. Pope,et al.  Amphibians and Reptiles of the Chicago Area. , 1945 .

[20]  M. Ritke,et al.  Life history of the gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in Western Tennessee , 1990 .

[21]  S. Zeger,et al.  Markov regression models for time series: a quasi-likelihood approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[22]  J. R. Bider,et al.  Influence of moon phase and weather factors on locomotory activity in Bufo americanus , 1974 .

[23]  W. F. Blair.  A Breeding Population of the Mexican Toad (Bufo Valliceps) in Relation to Its Environment , 1960 .

[24]  C. Bishop,et al.  VALIDATION TESTS OF AN AMPHIBIAN CALL COUNT SURVEY TECHNIQUE IN ONTARIO, CANADA , 1997 .

[25]  G. Box,et al.  Transformation of the Independent Variables , 1962 .

[26]  E. B. Hart,et al.  Growth and Reproduction on Milk Diets , 1931 .

[27]  K. Wells.  The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  P. Bishop,et al.  Chorus attendance by male and female painted reed frogs ( Hyperolius marmoratus ): environmental factors and selection pressures. , 1995 .

[29]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[30]  W. F. Blair.  Calling and Spawning Seasons in a Mixed Population of Anurans , 1961 .

[31]  Richard Kay,et al.  Assessing the fit of the logistic model: a case study of children with the haemolytic uraemic syndrome , 1986 .

[32]  D. Marsh.  Variable Responses to Rainfall by Breeding Tungara Frogs , 2000, Copeia.

[33]  H. John-Alder,et al.  Thermal Physiology, Phenology, and Distribution of Tree Frogs , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[34]  L. Carrascal,et al.  Reproductive Phenology and Temporal Patterns of Mate Access in Mediterranean Anurans , 1990 .

[35]  K. Wells,et al.  Individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor: implications for energy expenditure , 1994 .

[36]  T. Halliday,et al.  Calling by male midwife toads stimulates females to maintain reproductive condition , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  M. F. Given.  VOCALIZATIONS AND ACOUSTIC INTERACTIONS OF THE CARPENTER FROG, RANA VIRGATIPES , 1987 .

[38]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[39]  J. J. Gelder,et al.  Sound Activity and Migration During the Breeding Period of Rana temporaria L., R. arvalis Nilsson, Pelobates fuscus Laur. and Rana esculenta L. , 1971 .

[40]  Hans Schneider,et al.  Acoustic Behavior and Physiology of Vocalization in the European Tree Frog, Hyla Arborea (L.) , 1977 .

[41]  M. Gilbert.  Reproduction of the Northern Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens) in Floodplain Habitat in the Richelieu River, P. Quebec, Canada , 1994 .

[42]  M. Dorcas,et al.  Temporal Variation in Anuran Calling Behavior: Implications for Surveys and Monitoring Programs , 2000, Copeia.

[43]  C. Navas,et al.  THERMAL DEPENDENCY OF CALLING PERFORMANCE IN THE EURYTHERMIC FROG COLOSTETHUS SUBPUNCTATUS , 2001 .

[44]  U. Heinzmann.  Untersuchungen zur Bio-Akustik und Ökologie der Geburtshelferkröte, Alytes o. obstetricans (Laur.) , 1970, Oecologia.

[45]  R. Alford,et al.  Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  C. F. Herreid,et al.  Temperature and Development of the Wood Frog, Rana Sylvatica, in Alaska , 1967 .

[47]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Auditory Processing of Vocal Signals in Anurans , 1977 .

[48]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[49]  Charles R. Peterson,et al.  The Use of Automated Data-Acquisition Techniques in Monitoring Amphibian and Reptile Populations , 1992 .

[50]  R. Wassersug,et al.  Amphibians and Reptiles of Nova Scotia , 1984 .

[51]  Ryonosuke Okuno.  STUDIES ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE JAPANESE TOAD, BUFO JAPONICUS JAPONICUS. : VIII. CLIMATIC FACTORS INFLUENCING THE BREEDING ACTIVITY , 1985 .

[52]  H. Obert.  The dependence of calling activity in Rana esculenta Linné 1758 and Rana ridibunda Pallas 1771 upon exogenous factors (Ranidae, Anura) , 1975, Oecologia.

[53]  Albert Hazen Wright,et al.  Handbook of Frogs and Toads ... of the United States and Canada , 1949 .