Cephalometric outcomes of a new orthopaedic appliance for Class III malocclusion treatment.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate dental and skeletal effects of a new orthopaedic appliance for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cephalometric study was performed on a sample of 18 patients with a skeletal Class III malocclusion (4 males; 14 females; mean age 8.8 ± 1.5 years) treated with the Pushing Splints 3 (PS3) protocol. The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males; 13 females; mean age 9.1 ± 1.8 years) selected from a database of subjects with untreated Class III malocclusion. The cephalometric analysis was performed at the beginning (T0) and the end of the orthopaedic therapy (T1). Significant differences between the treated and control groups were assessed with independent samples t-test (P < 0.05). RESULTS In the PS3 group, the post-treatment cephalometric values showed a forward displacement of the maxilla, resulting in a statistically significant increase of the SNA angle. ANPg and Wits appraisal improved significantly compared with the control group. Lingual inclination of mandibular incisors and buccal inclination of the upper incisors were significantly increased in comparison with the control group. No significant differences were recorded for backward mandibular rotation. LIMITATIONS This study presents a short-term evaluation of the treatment and the use of a historical control group. CONCLUSIONS The PS3 was effective for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients, with favourable maxillary advancement and control of the vertical skeletal relationships.

[1]  T. El-Bialy,et al.  Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial. , 2018, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  J. McNamara,et al.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction. , 2017, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[3]  R. Martina,et al.  Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  N. Fareen,et al.  Treatment effects of Reverse Twin-Block and Reverse Pull Face Mask on craniofacial morphology in early and late mixed dentition children. , 2017, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[5]  H. Worthington,et al.  Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial , 2016, Journal of orthodontics.

[6]  L. Franchi,et al.  Comparisons of two protocols for the early treatment of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony. , 2016, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  L. Franchi,et al.  Short-term effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III patients with different vertical skeletal relationships. , 2015, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  S. Lindauer,et al.  Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[9]  R. Rongo,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions. , 2014, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  J. McNamara,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  S. Baek,et al.  Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  L. Franchi,et al.  Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  T. Tortop,et al.  Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[14]  L. Franchi,et al.  Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  J. Årtun,et al.  Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  R. Behrents,et al.  Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  J. McNamara,et al.  Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  L. Franchi,et al.  Stability factors after double-jaw surgery in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[19]  L. Franchi,et al.  Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[20]  P. Turley,et al.  The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  Kee-Joon Lee,et al.  Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  C. Gallo,et al.  Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  J. McNamara,et al.  Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  S. Yüksel,et al.  Early and late facemask therapy. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[25]  J. McNamara,et al.  Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  E. Gunel,et al.  Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[27]  E. Ellis,et al.  Components of adult Class III malocclusion. , 1984, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[28]  G. Dahlberg,et al.  Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students , 1941, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[29]  B. Thiruvenkatachari,et al.  Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  J. Hartsfield,et al.  Family History and Genetics of Mandibular Prognathism , 2014 .

[31]  U. Hägg,et al.  Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.