Head Injuries in Child Pedestrian Accidents—In-Depth Case Analysis and Reconstructions

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate head injuries, injury risks, and corresponding tolerance levels of children in car-to–child pedestrian collisions. Methods. An in-depth accident analysis was carried out based on 23 accident cases involving child pedestrians. These cases were collected with detailed information about pedestrians, cars, and road environments. All 23 accidents were reconstructed using the MADYMO program with mathematical models of passenger cars and child pedestrians developed at Chalmers University of Technology. The contact properties of the car models were derived from the European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) subsystem tests. Results. The accident analysis demonstrated that the head was the most frequently and severely injured body part of child pedestrians. Most accidents occurred at impact speeds lower than 40 km/h and 98% of the child pedestrians were impacted from the lateral direction. The initial postures of children at the moment of impact were identified. Nearly half (47%) of the children were running, which was remarkable compared with the situation of adult pedestrians. From accident reconstructions it was found that head impact conditions and injury severities were dependent on the shape and stiffness of the car front, impact velocity, and stature of the child pedestrian. Head injury criteria and corresponding tolerance levels were analyzed and discussed by correlating the calculated injury parameters with the injury outcomes in the accidents. Conclusions. Reducing head injuries should be set as a priority in the protection of child pedestrians. HIC is an important injury criterion for predicting the risks of head injuries in child pedestrian accidents. The tolerance level of head injuries can have a considerable variation due to individual differences of the child pedestrians. By setting a suitable speed limit and improving the design of car front, the head injury severities of child pedestrians can be reduced.

[1]  Ralph Aronberg.  Airborne trajectory analysis derivation for use in accident reconstruction , 1990 .

[2]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Child restraint evaluation by experimental and mathematical simulation , 1979 .

[3]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A HUMAN-BODY MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SIMULATION OF CAR-PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS , 1997 .

[4]  D. Otte,et al.  Use of Throw Distances of Pedestrians and Bicyclists as Part of a Scientific Accident Reconstruction Method , 2004 .

[5]  Y Mizuno.  International harmonized research activities (ihra) status report of the pedestrian safety working group , 1998 .

[6]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  Effects of Vehicle Impact Velocity and Front-End Structure on Dynamic Responses of Child Pedestrians , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Jerry J. Eubanks,et al.  Pedestrian Throw Kinematics in Forward Projection Collisions , 2002 .

[8]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN CHILD CADAVERS AND CHILD DUMMY BY USING CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN SIMULATED COLLISIONS , 1976 .

[9]  Grzegorz Teresiński,et al.  Evidential value of injuries useful for reconstruction of the pedestrian-vehicle location at the moment of collision. , 2002, Forensic Science International.

[10]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Analysis and load assessment of secondary impact to adult pedestrians after car collisions on roads , 2001 .

[11]  Xuejun Liu,et al.  Development of Child Pedestrian Mathematical Models and Evaluation with Accident Reconstruction , 2002 .

[12]  Per Lövsund,et al.  A Human-Body 3D Mathematical Model for Simulation of Car-Pedestrian Impacts , 2000 .

[13]  Maryvonne Dejeammes,et al.  Exploration of Biomechanical Data Towards a Better Evaluation of Tolerance for Children Involved in Automotive Accidents , 1984 .

[14]  H von Holst,et al.  Serious brain injury from traffic-related causes: priorities for primary prevention. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  C. Y. Warner,et al.  Force/deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporo-parietal region of the human head , 1991 .

[16]  Jingzhen Yang.  Review of Injury Biomechanics in Car-Pedestrian Collisions , 2005 .

[17]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  EVALUATION OF A NEW PEDESTRIAN HEAD INJURY PROTECTION SYSTEM WITH A SENSOR IN THE BUMPER AND LIFTING OF THE BONNET’S REAR PART , 2001 .

[18]  Dietmar Otte.  SEVERITY AND MECHANISM OF HEAD IMPACTS IN CAR TO PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS , 1999 .

[19]  Christian Krettek,et al.  SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF A NEW IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATION STUDY IN GERMANY CALLED GIDAS , 2003 .

[20]  総務庁,et al.  White paper on traffic safety in Japan , 2000 .

[21]  Etienne Javouhey,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of severe traumatic brain injury resulting from road accidents: a population-based study. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.