Validation of a new standardized method to measure proximal aneurysm neck angulation.

PURPOSE This study presented and validated a new standardized method for the measurement of the aortic angulation in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and quantified the observer variability. METHODS A standardized method to quantify aortic angulation was introduced. To measure aortic angulation, a center lumen line (CLL) of the aorta was made, and a three-dimensional (3D) aortic reconstruction was obtained. The 3D reconstruction was turned 360 degrees perpendicular to the CLL in the middle of the flexure. The sharpest angle of the CLL was considered the true angle of the aortic axis. The computed tomography angiography data sets of 20 patients scheduled for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) were obtained. The angles between the suprarenal aorta and the aneurysm neck (alpha) and between the aneurysm neck and sac (beta) were measured. Two observers independently measured the angles. Differences of each pair of measurements were plotted against their mean and intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were calculated according to Bland and Altman. RESULTS The intraobserver mean difference for angle alpha was -0.2 degrees (-0.5%), with a repeatability coefficient (RC) of 6.4 degrees (20.2%), and 0.6 degrees (1.4%) for angle beta, with a RC of 6.2 degrees (13.4%). The interobserver mean difference for angle alpha was -1.5 degrees (-4.5%), with a RC of 6.9 degrees (22.0%), and -0.2 degrees (-0.4%) for angle beta, with a RC of 7.4 degrees (16.0%). No significant differences were observed between the observers. CONCLUSION The presented technique to objectively quantify the angulation of the aneurysm neck is easy to perform and reliable. This method showed good intraobserver and interobserver variability and should therefore be the standard when measuring and reporting aortic angulation.

[1]  C. Peña,et al.  Sixty-four-detector CT angiography of infrarenal aortic neck length and angulation: prospective analysis of interobserver variability. , 2008, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[3]  Koen L Vincken,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography of the aneurysm neck: conformational changes during the cardiac cycle with possible consequences for endograft sizing and future design. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  F. Moll,et al.  Long-Term Single-Center Results with AneuRx Endografts for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[5]  Erik Buskens,et al.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  C. Zarins,et al.  Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  J. Buth,et al.  Influence of Severe Infrarenal Aortic Neck Angulation on Complications at the Proximal Neck following Endovascular AAA Repair: A EUROSTAR Study , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[8]  T. Resch,et al.  Intraoperative Proximal Endoleaks during AAA Stent-Graft Repair: Evaluation of Risk Factors and Treatment with Palmaz Stents , 2001 .

[9]  Robert Morgan,et al.  Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[10]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[11]  G. Maddern,et al.  Predictors of success following endovascular aneurysm repair: mid-term results. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[12]  S. Travis,et al.  Anatomical risk factors for proximal perigraft endoleak and graft migration following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  Garrett Fitzmaurice,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement. , 2002, Nutrition.

[14]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Potential Value of Aneurysm Sac Volume Measurements in Addition to Diameter Measurements after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair , 2009, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[15]  S. Money,et al.  Aortic neck angulation predicts adverse outcome with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  K. Ouriel,et al.  Aortoiliac morphologic correlations in aneurysms undergoing endovascular repair. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.