Tame: Time Window Scheduling of Wireless Access Points for Maximum Energy Efficiency and High Throughput

Wi-Fi interface is one of the predominant energy consumers in Wi-Fi stations. Despite many researches on Wi-Fi energy management, energy wastage of Wi-Fi stations resulting from network contention among multiple access points(APs) has not been widely investigated. In this paper, we analyze the network contentions occur among multiple APs, and show that Wi-Fi power save mode performance could be severely affected by network contentions. In order to overcome the network contention problem, we propose a scheduling policy, Tame, to assign access points into different sub clusters, in each of which none of the access points have network contentions and data can be transmitted simultaneously without collision. Access points properly control Wi-Fi stations to switch states between sleep and active to avoid stations' packet receiving time overlapping, while the energy wastage from network contentions is mitigated and network performance is guaranteed. We simulate Tame in Qualnet and conclude that Tame, compared with the related work Sleep Well, enhances the average throughput of Wi-Fi stations by an average of 13% for CBR traffic. Simultaneously, the corresponding Wi-Fi interface energy is consumed more efficiently.

[1]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Efficient Strategies for Channel Management in Wireless LANs , 2005 .

[2]  Xi Chen,et al.  M-PSM: Mobility-Aware Power Save Mode for IEEE 802.11 WLANs , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[3]  Justin Manweiler,et al.  Avoiding the Rush Hours: WiFi Energy Management via Traffic Isolation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Yi-Bing Lin,et al.  An Effective Power Conservation Scheme for IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  Smart power-saving mode for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[6]  William A. Arbaugh,et al.  Weighted coloring based channel assignment for WLANs , 2005, MOCO.

[7]  Wenbo Wang,et al.  An Adaptive Energy Saving Mechanism in the Wireless Packet Access Network , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[8]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[9]  Fanica Gavril,et al.  Algorithms for a maximum clique and a maximum independent set of a circle graph , 1973, Networks.

[10]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Adaptive Power Saving Mechanisms for DCF in IEEE 802.11 , 2005, Mob. Networks Appl..

[11]  Rong-Hong Jan,et al.  A power-saving scheduling for infrastructure-mode 802.11 wireless LANs , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[12]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  An Inter-Access Point Coordination Protocol for Dynamic Channel Selection in IEEE802.11 Wireless LANs , 2007 .

[13]  Daniel Brélaz,et al.  New methods to color the vertices of a graph , 1979, CACM.

[14]  Ramachandran Ramjee,et al.  NAPman: network-assisted power management for wifi devices , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[15]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  A Client-Driven Approach for Channel Management in Wireless LANs , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[16]  Suman Banerjee,et al.  Distributed channel management in uncoordinated wireless environments , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[17]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Self-management in chaotic wireless deployments , 2007, Wirel. Networks.

[18]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[19]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Self-management in chaotic wireless deployments , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[20]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  CACAO: Distributed Client-Assisted Channel Assignment Optimization for Uncoordinated WLANs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.