Eye Movements Reveal the Influence of Event Structure on Reading Behavior

When we read narrative texts such as novels and newspaper articles, we segment information presented in such texts into discrete events, with distinct boundaries between those events. But do our eyes reflect this event structure while reading? This study examines whether eye movements during the reading of discourse reveal how readers respond online to event structure. Participants read narrative passages as we monitored their eye movements. Several measures revealed that event structure predicted eye movements. In two experiments, we found that both early and overall reading times were longer for event boundaries. We also found that regressive saccades were more likely to land on event boundaries, but that readers were less likely to regress out of an event boundary. Experiment 2 also demonstrated that tracking event structure carries a working memory load. Eye movements provide a rich set of online data to test the cognitive reality of event segmentation during reading.

[1]  Marte Otten,et al.  Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Christopher A. Kurby,et al.  Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[4]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Conscious understanding during comprehension , 1996 .

[5]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Discourse comprehension. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. , 1995 .

[7]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Chapter 9 Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension , 2009 .

[9]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Updating situation models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human Brain Activity Time-Locked to Narrative Event Boundaries , 2007, Psychological science.

[11]  L. Davachi,et al.  What Constitutes an Episode in Episodic Memory? , 2011, Psychological science.

[12]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Two Decades of Structure Building. , 1997, Discourse processes.

[13]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts , 2005 .

[15]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. , 1999 .

[17]  Darren Newtson,et al.  The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior , 1976 .

[18]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Rolf A. Zwaan.  Processing Narrative Time Shifts , 1996 .

[20]  Gabriel A Radvansky,et al.  Reading times and the detection of event shift processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  F. Ferreira,et al.  The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Working memory and situation model updating , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[23]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[24]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Gabriel A. Radvansky,et al.  A Novel Study: A Situation Model Analysis of Reading Times , 2011 .

[27]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Surface information loss in comprehension , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  R. Barker,et al.  One boy's day : a specimen record of behavior , 1951 .

[32]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Clause Wrap-Up on Eye Movements during Reading , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  A Computational Model of Event Segmentation From Perceptual Prediction , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Segmentation in the perception and memory of events , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Jos J. A. Van Berkum,et al.  Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? , 2009, Brain Research.

[37]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Prediction Error Associated with the Perceptual Segmentation of Naturalistic Events , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.