Line Topology Identification Using Multiobjective Evolutionary Computation

The broadband capacity of the twisted-pair lines strongly varies within the copper access network. It is therefore important to assess the ability of a digital subscriber line (DSL) to support the DSL services prior to deployment. This task is handled by the line qualification procedures, where the identification of the line topology is an important part. This paper presents a new method, denoted topology identification via model-based evolutionary computation (TIMEC), for line topology identification, where either one-port measurements or both one- and two-port measurements are utilized. The measurements are input to a model-based multiobjective criterion that is minimized by a genetic algorithm to provide an estimate of the line topology. The inherent flexibility of TIMEC enables the incorporation of a priori information, e.g., the total line length. The performance of TIMEC is evaluated by computer simulations with varying degrees of information. Comparison with a state-of-art method indicates that TIMEC achieves better results for all the tested lines when only one-port measurements are used. The results are improved when employing both one- and two-port measurements. If a rough estimate of the total length is also used, near-perfect estimation is obtained for all the tested lines.

[1]  Tom Bostoen,et al.  Subscriber loop topology classification by means of time-domain reflectometry , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[2]  L. Van Biesen,et al.  On the identification of cables for metallic access networks , 2001, IMTC 2001. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Rediscovering Measurement in the Age of Informatics (Cat. No.01CH 37188).

[3]  G. Beligiannis,et al.  A generic applied evolutionary hybrid technique , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  Permanent Document TM 6 ( 97 ) 02 Cable reference models for simulating metallic access networks , .

[5]  Fredrik Lindqvist,et al.  Low‐Order and Causal Twisted‐Pair Cable Modeling by Means of the Hilbert Transform , 2008 .

[6]  Kenneth J. Kerpez,et al.  Single-ended loop-makeup Identification-part II: improved algorithms and performance results , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Stefano Galli,et al.  Loop makeup identification via single ended testing: beyond mere loop qualification , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  Grigorios N. Beligiannis,et al.  Nonlinear model structure identification of complex biomedical data using a genetic-programming-based technique , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  Understanding Digital Subscriber Line Technology , 1999 .

[11]  Ivo F. Sbalzariniy,et al.  Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2000 .

[12]  Herve Dedieu The Copper Channel—Loop Characteristics and Models , 2005 .

[13]  Thierry Pollet,et al.  Preprocessing of Signals for Single-Ended Subscriber Line Testing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Thierry Pollet,et al.  Estimation of the transfer function of a subscriber loop by means of a one-port scattering parameter measurement at the central office , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[15]  Kenneth J. Kerpez,et al.  Single-ended loop make-up identification-part I: a method of analyzing TDR measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.