Progress Towards Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Truss Braced Wing Aircraft with Flutter Constraints

on multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) of truss-braced wing airplanes. The primary focus has been to include utter constraints for structural sizing of the wing. The structural sizing uses a gradient-based optimization procedure along with an analytically calculated response function sensitivity with respect to the thickness design variables. It is shown that using the updated routine leads to lower structural mass in comparison with the fully-stressed structural design procedure used in the previous MDO studies. The primary reasons for the lower mass is that inertial weight relief due to secondary structure is now included in the sizing process, and the buckling analysis is now based on a linearized eigenvalue problem, as opposed to a simple beam Euler buckling criteria used for the previous study which was signicantly conservative. However, the results show that for a wing with lower mass the utter constraint becomes active for both strut-braced and truss-braced wing congurations. Hence, it is important to include those in the MDO studies to maintain feasibility of designs. Two challenges encountered during the process of including structural optimization with the utter constraint within the system-level MDO architecture are discussed along with the strategies devised to overcome them: convergence of structural optimization and the resulting numerical noise. A response surface methodology is used to integrate the structural optimization and system-level MDO and some initial results for the design of a truss-braced wing transonic transport airplane for minimum fuel consumption and emissions are presented.

[1]  Johnathan Green Laminar Flow Control - Back to the Future? , 2008 .

[2]  Joel Grasmeyer,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a transonic strut-braced wing aircraft , 1999 .

[3]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Development of a framework for truss-braced wing conceptual MDO , 2011 .

[4]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Design Optimization of a Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft , 2009 .

[5]  K. Takeda,et al.  Systematic review of the impact of emissions from aviation on current and future climate , 2008, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[6]  W. Pfeminger Laminar flow control laminarization , 1977 .

[7]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Development of Framework for Truss-Braced Wing Conceptual MDO , 2010 .

[8]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Transport Weight Reduction through MDO: The Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport , 2005 .

[9]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Conceptual Design Studies of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport , 2000 .

[10]  Walter G Walker,et al.  A revised gust-load formula and a re-evaluation of v-g data taken on civil transport airplanes from 1933 to 1950 , 1954 .

[11]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Structural Design of a Truss Braced Wing: Potential and Challenges , 2009 .

[12]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Energy and Finite Element Methods In Structural Mechanics : SI Units , 2017 .

[13]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Detection and Repair of Poorly Converged Optimization Runs , 2001 .

[14]  B. Grossman,et al.  Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design , 1996 .

[15]  L. Watson,et al.  Reasonable Design Space Approach to Response Surface Approximation , 1999 .

[16]  David Alexander,et al.  Emissionless Aircraft Study , 2002 .