Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification

Abstract Previous research has found asymmetric effects of speaking rate on VOT cross-linguistically: as rate slows, long-lag VOTs and negative VOTs increase, but short-lag VOTs remain essentially unchanged. If we assume, as have many phonologists, that the two-way contrast in voicing languages (e.g. French) is [voice] vs. [O] and in aspirating languages (e.g. English) is [spread glottis] vs. [O], then it appears that at slower rates, a phonological contrast is heightened by selective increase in the phonetic cue for the specified feature. Thus, slowing down causes longer aspiration in aspirating languages and longer prevoicing in voicing languages but no change in short-lag stops. We report the results of an experiment on Central Standard Swedish stops designed to investigate the effect of speaking rate on VOT. CS Swedish uses both prevoiced and aspirated stops in utterance-initial position, hence the phonological feature(s) involved in this contrast is not clear. We found that both prevoicing and aspiration increase in slow speech in Swedish. This suggests that both [voice] and [spread glottis] are the specified features of phonological contrast in CS Swedish, and in turn raises questions about whether phonological specification more generally is economical. Moreover, the fact that speaking rate affects VOT even in situations like CS Swedish in which the phonological contrast is over-specified suggests that such modification is largely due to production dynamics, not speakers’ sensitivity to listeners’ needs.

[1]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  Temporal effects of focus in Swedish , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[3]  D. Pisoni.  Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Patrick Honeybone,et al.  Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: the case of obstruent laryngeal specifications , 2004 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[6]  J L Miller,et al.  Effects of syllable-initial voicing and speaking rate on the temporal characteristics of monosyllabic words. , 1999, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Junko Ito,et al.  Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics , 1989 .

[9]  Szilárd Szentgyörgyi,et al.  Voice and aspiration: Evidence from Russian, Hungarian, German, Swedish, and Turkish , 2006 .

[10]  Kerry P. Green,et al.  A Cross-Language Comparison of Speaking Rate Effects on the Production of Voice Onset Time in English and Spanish , 1999, Phonetica.

[11]  B. McMurray,et al.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. , 2011, Psychological review.

[12]  Catherine Ringen,et al.  Laryngeal features in German , 2002, Phonology.

[13]  John M. Anderson,et al.  Principles of Dependency Phonology , 1987 .

[14]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[15]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  B. Repp.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects : new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception , 1982 .

[17]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  The internal organization of phonological segments , 2005 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[19]  Kjellrun T. Englund.  Voice onset time in infant directed speech over the first six months , 2005 .

[20]  Q. Summerfield.  Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Harlan Lane,et al.  Speaking rate , voice-onset time , and quantity : The search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues , 2002 .

[22]  Catherine Ringen,et al.  German fricatives: coda devoicing or positional faithfulness?* , 2009, Phonology.

[23]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English , 1997 .

[24]  A. Reeves,et al.  Speaking Rate and Segments: A Look at the Relation between Speech Production and Speech Perception for the Voicing Contrast , 1986 .

[25]  W. W. Clark,et al.  Voicing judgements by chinchillas trained with a reward paradigm , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  J L Miller,et al.  Internal Structure of Phonetic Categories: Effects of Speaking Rate , 1997, Phonetica.

[27]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  S D Soli,et al.  The role of spectral cues in discrimination of voice onset time differences. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  G. K. Iverson,et al.  Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic , 1995, Phonology.

[30]  J Pind.  Speech segment durations and quantity in Icelandic. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[32]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[33]  M. Dorman,et al.  Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Distinctive (voice) does not Imply Regressive Assimilation: Evidence from Swedish , 2004 .

[35]  P. Keating.  PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING , 1984 .

[36]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[37]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.

[38]  John Harris,et al.  English Sound Structure , 1994 .

[39]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[40]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Preaspiration in the Nordic languages : synchronic and diachronic aspects , 2002 .

[41]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[42]  Ann R. Bradlow,et al.  Stability of temporal contrasts across speaking styles in English and Croatian , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[43]  S. Anderson.  Phonology in the twentieth century : theories of rules and theories of representations , 1985 .

[44]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test , 1983, Speech Commun..

[45]  Eric Halgren,et al.  Linear Coding of Voice Onset Time , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Ann R. Bradlow,et al.  Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[47]  Joseph C. Toscano,et al.  Continuous Perception and Graded Categorization , 2010, Psychological science.

[48]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.