Automated Diagnosis System to Support Colon Cancer Treatment: MATCH

The most uncertain and difficult medical decision in Colon Cancer (CC) is the selection of the most personalized treatment option [1, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13]. MATCH Automated Diagnosis System has been primarily developed to target those obstacles, assisting clinicians in the post-diagnosis phases of the investigations. MATCH system is being currently fed with hundreds of data samples that range from clinical information (including follow-up from every treatment applied), tumor markers [1], proteomic sequences, gene suppressors and SNPs functional correlations. Each dimension of the data is described in MATCH CC ontology. The importance of all data attributes and the corresponding processing information is modifiable, but the default statistical model has been developed together with oncology experts from Jagiellonian Medial College and FONDAZIONE IOM. Health professionals using MATCH system will be able to query the database of anonymised clinical and molecular information. In this paper we will present a design of the MATCH system with the special emphasis on the semantic modeling as the authors' contribution to the project. The MATCH CC ontology, created as a part of knowledge management layer, is a basis of MATCH logical architecture and processing [2, 3]. The MATCH system is developed with Web-Services, which assure theinteroperability between hospitals, pharmaceutical laboratories and research centers, which have access and possibility to exchange samples, mined information and data models.

[1]  M. Melamed,et al.  Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA flow cytometry in colorectal cancer. , 1993, Cytometry.

[2]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Ontology-based Knowledge Representation for Bioinformatics , 2000, Briefings Bioinform..

[3]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  H. Nelson,et al.  The treatment of locally advanced colon cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  N. Korda,et al.  Rule-Based Transformation of SQL Relational Databases to OWL Ontologies , 2007 .

[6]  Mariusz Duplaga,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Quality of Healthcare Services , 2004, International Conference on Computational Science.

[7]  Arno Siebes From discovered knowledge to decisionmaking , 2002 .

[8]  C. Compton,et al.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  F. Ahmed Molecular markers that predict response to colon cancer therapy , 2005, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[10]  Babak Akhgar,et al.  Requirements and System Architecture for a Decision Support System for the treatment of Colorectal Cancer , 2007, BIOCOMP.

[11]  C. Compton,et al.  The Staging of Colorectal Cancer: 2004 and Beyond , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  T. Smyrk,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma survival among hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma family members , 1998, Cancer.

[13]  Irina Astrova,et al.  Storing OWL Ontologies in SQL Relational Databases , 2007 .