An Individual‐Level Assessment of the Relationship between Spin‐Off Activities and Research Performance in Universities

One of the most problematic aspects in the creation of spin‐offs by university personnel concerns the relationship between entrepreneurial activity and research activity by researcher‐entrepreneurs. The literature has expressed varying and opposing views as to the nature of the relationship, but very little has been produced to empirically legitimate one position or another. The present work proposes to address this shortcoming by exploring the relationship existing between academic spin‐off generation and the research performance of enterprise founders. The study investigates whether, and to what extent, scientific performance by academic entrepreneurs is different than that of their colleagues, and if the involvement in entrepreneurial activity has an influence on the individual's research activity. The research questions are answered by considering all spin‐offs generated by Italian universities over the period 2001–2008 and evaluating, through a bibliometric approach, the scientific performance of founders relative to that of their colleagues who carry out research in the same field. The data show better scientific performance by the researcher‐entrepreneurs than that of their colleagues, and in addition, although there are some variations across fields, the creation of a spin‐off does not seem, on average, to have negative effects on the scientific performance of the founders.

[1]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages , 2005 .

[2]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level , 2011, Scientometrics.

[3]  Scott Shane,et al.  Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States , 2004 .

[4]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[5]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? , 2009, ArXiv.

[6]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[7]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .

[8]  W. Glänzel.  Seven Myths in Bibliometrics About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies , 2008 .

[9]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Research Productivity in a System of Universities , 1998 .

[10]  Yuan-Chieh Chang,et al.  The Impacts of Academic Patenting and Licensing on Knowledge Production and Diffusion: A Test of the Anti-Commons Effect in Taiwan , 2008 .

[11]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Lifting the crown - citation z-score , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Universities and industrial transformation: An interpretative and selective literature study with special emphasis on Sweden , 2002 .

[13]  Luciano Gallino,et al.  La scomparsa dell'Italia industriale , 2003 .

[14]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications , 2010, Scientometrics.

[15]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities , 2006 .

[16]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[17]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Book Review: Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spin-offs and Wealth Creation , 2005 .

[18]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Leveraging Talent: Spin-off Strategy at Industrial Research , 2002 .

[19]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Virtuous circles in science and commerce , 2007 .

[20]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework , 2008 .

[21]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology , 1987 .

[22]  Irwin Feller,et al.  Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can , 1990 .

[23]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[24]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Academic Inventiveness and Entrepreneurship: On the Importance of Start-up Companies in Commercializing Academic Patents , 2006 .

[25]  P. Benneworth,et al.  University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice , 2005 .

[26]  J. Metcalfe.  Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction , 2002 .

[27]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs , 2011 .

[28]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[29]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY , 2007 .

[30]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[31]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[32]  T. Allen,et al.  Delineating the Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial University: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Experience , 2007 .

[33]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The alignment of public research supply and industry demand for effective technology transfer: the case of Italy , 2009, ArXiv.

[34]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced indicators of productivity of universitiesAn application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data , 2006, Scientometrics.

[35]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Reprinted Article Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT , 2009 .

[36]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Assessing the relative technology transfer performance of universities and public research laboratories: the case of Italy , 2012 .

[37]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity , 2007 .

[38]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[39]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[40]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Commercializing Science: Is There a University "Brain Drain" from Academic Entrepreneurship? , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Richard Florida,et al.  Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development , 1999 .

[42]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society , 2009 .

[43]  Maria Theresa Larsen.  The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence , 2011 .

[44]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[45]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[46]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities , 2001 .

[47]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[48]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[49]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[50]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .

[51]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[52]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[53]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[54]  Cristiano Giuffrida,et al.  A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[55]  Jaider Vega Jurado,et al.  Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity , 2008 .

[56]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[57]  Jaider Vega-Jurado,et al.  Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity , 2008, Scientometrics.

[58]  Mike Wright,et al.  University Spin-Out Companies and Venture Capital , 2006 .

[59]  Yuan-Chieh Chang,et al.  The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective , 2009 .

[60]  Joel West,et al.  Commercializing Open Science: Deep Space Communications as the Lead Market for Shannon Theory, 196073 , 2008 .

[61]  C. González-Brambila,et al.  Faculty Entrepreneurs and Research Productivity , 2007 .

[62]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[63]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[64]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements , 2008 .