RPR: high-reliable low-cost geographical routing protocol in wireless sensor networks

Geographical routing mechanisms were widely used in wireless sensor networks(WSN),by which data packets could be routed to the destination sensor node through a small amount of local routing information.Geographic routing algorithms usually required planar graphs derived from the original network topologies.However,most planarization algorithms assumed a fixed communication radius of the sensor nodes,which mismatched real applications.The only practical algorithm brought in overheads in deleting and adding cross links.To provide a solution to the problem of existing algorithms,RPR(region partitioning-based routing) was introduced.RPR was a high-reliable and low-cost geographic routing protocol,which divided the whole network into numbers of regular regions,and tried to perform a region-greedy routing on the virtual node of a region when the node-greedy routing failed.RPR had high reliability since the transmissions between regions could reduce the average length of the routing paths.Furthermore,RPR had low cost because its planarization phase did not check or delete cross links.Experiments show that RPR performs better than existing algorithms.

[1]  Fabian Kuhn,et al.  Worst-Case optimal and average-case efficient geometric ad-hoc routing , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[2]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  Geographic routing made practical , 2005, NSDI.

[3]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR : Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless , 2000, MobiCom 2000.

[4]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Geometric ad-hoc routing: of theory and practice , 2003, PODC '03.

[5]  Jorge Urrutia,et al.  Compass routing on geometric networks , 1999, CCCG.

[6]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1999, DIALM '99.

[7]  Hong Shen,et al.  Developing Energy-Efficient Topologies and Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, NPC.

[8]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  On delivery guarantees of face and combined greedy-face routing in ad hoc and sensor networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[9]  Hong Cheng,et al.  Clustering Large Attributed Graphs: An Efficient Incremental Approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[10]  Jignesh M. Patel,et al.  Efficient aggregation for graph summarization , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[11]  Li Jian-Zhong,et al.  Concepts, Issues and Advance of Sensor Networks and Data Management of Sensor Networks , 2003 .

[12]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  Lazy cross-link removal for geographic routing , 2006, SenSys '06.

[13]  Ben Leong,et al.  Path vector face routing: geographic routing with local face information , 2005, 13TH IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP'05).

[14]  Godfried T. Toussaint,et al.  The relative neighbourhood graph of a finite planar set , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Distributed construction of a planar spanner and routing for ad hoc wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[16]  George Karypis,et al.  GREW - a scalable frequent subgraph discovery algorithm , 2004, Fourth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'04).