Arm movements effect on grasping force prediction using surface electromyography signals

This study investigated the arm movements effect on the relationship between surface electromyography (EMG) signals and grasping force. An experiment was conducted with four static arm conditions and two dynamic arm conditions. Six able-bodied subjects participated in the experiment. Surface EMG signals were acquired from five forearm muscles to build a multiple linear regression model. Subjects were instructed to complete three kinds of calibration tasks to train the model and one voluntarily varying grasping force task to test the model performance. The grasping force exerted by each subject was limited to be lower than 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) grasping force. Mean absolute difference (MAD) between predicted and observed grasping force was used to estimate the prediction performance. The window size of moving average filter was firstly optimized. Results showed that arm movements had a significant impact on grasping force prediction performance. Inter-condition MADs (training data and testing data are from different arm conditions) were greater than intra-condition MADs (training data and testing data are from the same arm condition, average 7.41%±1.46% MVC vs. 6.03%±0.40% MVC, p = 0.023). A multi-condition training scheme was applied to attenuate the arm movements effect. The multi-condition training scheme was proved to be useful to improve the model robustness to the arm movements effect.

[1]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Relationship between grasping force and features of single-channel intramuscular EMG signals , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  L De Smet,et al.  Effect of forearm rotation on grip strength. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[3]  J Malchaire,et al.  Evaluation of handgrip force from EMG measurements. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Aoife Finneran,et al.  Effects of grip type and wrist posture on forearm EMG activity, endurance time and movement accuracy , 2013 .

[5]  D Farina,et al.  Blind source identification from the multichannel surface electromyogram , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Zhaojie Ju,et al.  Surface EMG Based Hand Manipulation Identification Via Nonlinear Feature Extraction and Classification , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[7]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  Quantification and solutions of arm movements effect on sEMG pattern recognition , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[8]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  Rate-dependent hysteresis in the EMG-force relationship: A new discovery in EMG-force relationship , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[9]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Laurent Claudon,et al.  Evaluation of Grip Force Using Electromyograms in Isometric Isotonic Conditions. , 1998, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[11]  Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako,et al.  Hysteresis in the electromyography–force relationship: Toward an optimal model for the estimation of force , 2012, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  Dario Farina,et al.  Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Mogk,et al.  The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping , 2003, Ergonomics.

[14]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Crosstalk in surface electromyography of the proximal forearm during gripping tasks. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Application of a self-enhancing classification method to electromyography pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[18]  J. E. Fernandez,et al.  The effect of wrist and arm postures on peak pinch strength. , 1996, Journal of human ergology.

[19]  Dario Farina,et al.  Human?Machine Interfacing by Decoding the Surface Electromyogram [Life Sciences] , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[20]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Prediction of handgrip forces using surface EMG of forearm muscles. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[22]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[23]  Peter J. Keir,et al.  Prediction of forearm muscle activity during gripping , 2006, Ergonomics.

[24]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Characterization of EMG Patterns From Proximal Arm Muscles During Object- and Orientation-Specific Grasps , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  J. Saunders,et al.  Relation of human electromyogram to muscular tension. , 1952, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Dario Farina,et al.  Man/machine interface based on the discharge timings of spinal motor neurons after targeted muscle reinnervation , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.