LCA of a newsprint paper machine: a case study of capital equipment

PurposeThe environmental aspects of paper as a consumer good have been extensively studied. However, the paper machine has been mostly neglected in the literature. The purpose of this article is to present a LCA case study that explicitly focuses on the system of a newsprint paper machine and its environmental impacts and not on the system of the consumer good paper. The relevance of the paper machine as capital equipment is analyzed, and conclusions for the environmental improvement of paper machines are drawn based on identified hotspots. The article hereby answers the more general research questions of whether capital equipment has rightly been neglected in other studies regarding pulp and paper and which impact categories are important for analyzing the environmental burdens of a paper machine.MethodsThe study has been executed in collaboration with Voith Paper, an original equipment manufacturer. Hence, in distinction to literature-based studies, primary data on the paper machine was available resulting in a high overall data quality. Based on the ISO 14040 (2006) and 14044 (2006) standards, this article pursues a cradle-to-grave approach for the paper machine. It assesses the environmental impacts in the impact categories defined by the ReCiPe impact assessment methodology. Different types of energy generation are examined in a scenario analysis with combined heat and power generation (CHP) as the baseline case. For interpretation, a normalization and a sectoral analysis are performed.Results and discussionThe normalized results indicate fossil resource depletion and global warming as the most important impact categories. Global warming impacts are highly dependent on the energy processes and result to 432.7 kg CO2e per production of 1 t of paper for CHP and to 701.7 kg CO2e for EU25 grid mix. The sectoral analysis shows that the machinery's operations/use phase is clearly dominating most impact categories due to its long lifetime. An exception is the metal depletion, for which the materials and manufacturing processes are most important.ConclusionsThese findings prove that for most categories, the operations/use phase of the paper machine is the most important life cycle stage. In systems focusing on the consumer good paper, it is therefore sufficient to model the operation of the paper machine, whereas the manufacturing, transport, and end-of-life processes regarding the paper machine equipment can be neglected, unless metal depletion is important to the study.

[1]  M. J. Ramos-Peralonso,et al.  Integrated pollution prevention and control , 2001 .

[2]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The Environmental Relevance of Capital Goods in Life Cycle Assessments of Products and Services , 2007 .

[3]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal , 2007 .

[4]  M. Finkbeiner Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats , 2009 .

[5]  Rhianne Stone Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme , 2014 .

[6]  Albert W. Chan,et al.  LCA Case Studies Preliminary Assessment of the Environmental Benefits of Enzyme Bleaching for Pulp and Paper Making , .

[7]  Janet Ann ranganathan,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Protocol , 2004 .

[8]  Laura C. Draucker,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard , 2011 .

[9]  Jan-Henrik Hübner The Effects of Emission Trading on the Pulp and Paper Industry in Europe , 2007 .

[10]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2002 .

[11]  Anna Lúcia Mourad,et al.  Carton for beverage—A decade of process efficiency improvements enhancing its environmental profile , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  J. Seppälä,et al.  Forest industry and the environment: a life cycle assessment study from Finland , 1998 .

[13]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Comparison of methodologies for estimating the carbon footprint – case study of office paper , 2012 .

[14]  Hanna Pihkola,et al.  Carbon footprint and environmental impacts of print products from cradle to grave: Results from the LEADER project (Part 1) , 2010 .

[15]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[17]  David Evans,et al.  Using LCA to examine greenhouse gas abatement policy , 2003 .

[18]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling , 1999 .

[19]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Energy decision making in a pulp and paper mill: selection of LCA system boundary , 2010 .

[20]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Allocation of environmental burdens in co-product systems: Process and product-related burdens (Part 2) , 1999 .

[21]  Fredrik Öhman,et al.  Filtration properties of lignin precipitated from black liquor , 2001 .

[22]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental assessment of enzyme assisted processing in pulp and paper industry , 2008 .

[23]  Eric Johnson Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[24]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool—the case of recycling versus incineration of paper , 1998 .

[25]  Mercedes Hortal,et al.  The influence of contaminants in the environmental impact of recovered paper: a life cycle assessment perspective , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry , 2003 .