Three‐dimensional Fréchet differential kernels for seismicdelay times

Summary Seismic traveltimes are the most widely exploited data in seismology. Their Frechet or sensitivity kernels are important tools in tomographic inversions based on the Born or single-scattering approximation. The current study is motivated by a paradox posed by two seemingly irreconcilable observations in the numerical calculations for the sensitivity kernels of the traveltime perturbations. Calculations of kernels for 2-D media by the normal-mode approach indicate that traveltimes are most sensitive to the structure on and around the geometrical ray paths corresponding to the seismic arrivals, whereas calculations for 3-D media by geometrical ray theory predict exactly zero sensitivities on the ray paths. In the current work, we employ these two completely different wave-propagation approaches, the more efficient geometrical ray theory and the more accurate normal-mode theory, to investigate the 3-D sensitivities of the delay times to shear-wave speed variations. Expressions for the delay-time Frechet kernels are presented for both methods, and extensive numerical experiments are conducted for various types of seismic phases as well as for different reference earth models. The results show that the contradictory observations are but two examples of a wide range of behaviours in the delay-time sensitivity. For most of the seismic phases in realistic reference models with multiple discontinuities, wave-speed gradients and low-velocity zones, the wavefields are highly complicated and ray theory, which describes the response by the contributions of a few geometrical rays between the source and receiver, produces qualitatively different delay-time kernels from those obtained by the normal-mode theory, which includes essentially all contributions.

[1]  F. Gilbert,et al.  An application of normal mode theory to the retrieval of structural parameters and source mechanisms from seismic spectra , 1975, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Whole mantle P-wave travel time tomography , 1990 .

[3]  Toshiro Tanimoto,et al.  Waveforms of long-period body waves in a slightly aspherical earth model , 1993 .

[4]  Marta Woodward,et al.  Wave-equation tomography , 1992 .

[5]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Sensitivity of frequency-dependent traveltimes to laterally heterogeneous, anisotropic Earth structure , 1998 .

[6]  T. Tanimoto Formalism for traveltime inversion with finite frequency effects , 1995 .

[7]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes: the banana–doughnut paradox , 1999 .

[8]  R. Snieder,et al.  Linearized scattering of surface waves on a spherical earth , 1987 .

[9]  G. Backus,et al.  Numerical Applications of a Formalism for Geophysical Inverse Problems , 1967 .

[10]  R. Coates,et al.  Ray perturbation theory and the Born approximation , 1990 .

[11]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Evidence for deep mantle circulation from global tomography , 1997, Nature.

[12]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three-dimensional waveform sensitivity kernels , 1998 .

[13]  Robert L. Woodward,et al.  Global upper mantle structure from long-period differential travel times , 1991 .

[14]  T. Jordan,et al.  Observations of first-order mantle reverberations , 1987 .

[15]  Freeman Gilbert,et al.  Coupled free oscillations of an aspherical, dissipative, rotating Earth: Galerkin theory , 1986 .

[16]  E. Mochizuki The Free Oscillations of an Anisotropic and Heterogeneous Earth , 1986 .

[17]  F. Gilbert Excitation of the Normal Modes of the Earth by Earthquake Sources , 1971 .

[18]  T. Jordan,et al.  Seismic structure of the upper mantle in a central Pacific corridor , 1996 .

[19]  T. Tanimoto Free oscillations of a slightly anisotropic earth , 1986 .

[20]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes—I. Theory , 2000 .

[21]  Hua-wei Zhou,et al.  A high-resolution P wave model for the top 1200 km of the mantle , 1996 .

[22]  F. Dahlen,et al.  Mode-sum to ray-sum transformation in a spherical and an aspherical earth , 1996 .

[23]  Wei-jia Su,et al.  Degree 12 model of shear velocity heterogeneity in the mantle , 1994 .

[24]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Seismic Surface Waves and Free Oscillations in a Regionalized Earth Model , 1982 .

[25]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Generalized seismological data functionals , 1992 .

[26]  Robert A. Phinney,et al.  Representation of the Elastic ‐ Gravitational Excitation of a Spherical Earth Model by Generalized Spherical Harmonics , 1973 .

[27]  J. Schwinger,et al.  Variational Principles for Scattering Processes. I , 1950 .

[28]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[29]  James N. Brune,et al.  The polar phase shift of surface waves on a sphere , 1961 .

[30]  I. Henson Multiplet coupling of the normal modes of an elliptical, transversely isotropic earth , 1989 .

[31]  J. Woodhouse The coupling and attenuation of nearly resonant multiplets in the Earth's free oscillation spectrum , 1980 .

[32]  Chris Chapman,et al.  Ray theory and its extensions; WKBJ and Maslov seismograms , 1985 .

[33]  S. Grand Mantle shear structure beneath the Americas and surrounding oceans , 1994 .

[34]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite‐frequency traveltimes—II. Examples , 2000 .

[35]  K. Yomogida Fresnel zone inversion for lateral heterogeneities in the earth , 1992 .

[36]  Don W. Vasco,et al.  Formal inversion of ISC arrival times for mantle P-velocity structure , 1993 .

[37]  F. A. Dahlen,et al.  The Effect of A General Aspherical Perturbation on the Free Oscillations of the Earth , 1978 .