Intra- and inter-specific comparisons of leaf UV-B absorbing-compound concentration of southern broadleaf trees in the United States

Increased concentration of leaf UV-B absorbing-compounds due to exposure to UV-B radiation is widely accepted as one of the plant adaptations to resist enhanced UV-B radiation. This paper reports a field comparative study of dynamics and temporal changes of UV-B absorbing-compound concentration in 35 southern broadleaf trees over a growing season. Leaf UV-B absorbing-compound, chlorophyll concentration, and leaf thickness were measured from the sun-exposed leaves of 35 tree species collected monthly from individual trees growing within the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana from April to October in 2000. The USDA UV-B Monitoring Network Baton Rouge Station provided the ambient UV-B radiation data. Leaf UV-B absorbing-compound concentration varied significantly with leaf age and species. Intra-specifically, leaf UV-B absorbing-compound concentration exhibited a generally increasing trend during leaf growth and development in response to the increased exposure to natural UV-B/solar radiation during the growing season. Inter-specifically, significant differences existed in leaf UV-B absorbing-compound concentration. The species were compared and ranked based on the growing season averages of the leaf total UV-B absorbing-compound concentration. The species were further classified into three levels (high, medium, and low) based on the magnitude of UV-B absorbing-compound concentration.

[1]  Wilhelm Gruissem,et al.  Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants , 2002 .

[2]  R. Last,et al.  Arabidopsis Flavonoid Mutants Are Hypersensitive to UV-B Irradiation. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[3]  T. Day,et al.  Relating UV-B radiation screening effectiveness of foliage to absorbing-compound concentration and anatomical characteristics in a diverse group of plants , 1993, Oecologia.

[4]  Janet F. Bornman,et al.  A flavonoid mutant of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) exhibits increased sensitivity to UV‐B radiation in the primary leaf , 1996 .

[5]  Martyn M. Caldwell,et al.  Leaf epidermal transmittance of ultraviolet radiation and its implications for plant sensitivity to ulraviolet-radiation induced injury , 2004, Oecologia.

[6]  Gordon M. Heisler,et al.  Methodology for comprehensive evaluation of UV-B tolerance in trees , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[7]  M. Tevini,et al.  THE PROTECTIVE FUNCTION OF THE EPIDERMAL LAYER OF RYE SEEDLINGS AGAINST ULTRAVIOLET‐B RADIATION , 1991 .

[8]  E. Wellmann,et al.  Photocontrol of flavonoid biosynthesis , 1994 .

[9]  A. Britt,et al.  DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR IN PLANTS. , 1996, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[10]  H. L. Gorton,et al.  Effects of Epidermal Cell Shape and Pigmentation on Optical Properties of Antirrhinum Petals at Visible and Ultraviolet Wavelengths , 1996, Plant physiology.

[11]  Stephan D. Flint,et al.  Internal filters: Prospects for UV‐acclimation in higher plants , 1983 .

[12]  Janet F. Bornman,et al.  Plants and UV-B: Ultraviolet radiation as a stress factor and the role of protective pigments , 1997 .

[13]  Alyson K. Tobin,et al.  Plants and UV-B: DNA damage and repair in plants , 1997 .

[14]  Joe H. Sullivan,et al.  EFFECTS OF ULTRAVIOLET‐B IRRADIATION ON SEEDLING GROWTH IN THE PINACEAE , 1988 .

[15]  U. L. Yadawa,et al.  A Rapid and Nondestructive Method to Determine Chlorophyll in Intact Leaves , 1986, HortScience.