A review of two models for tolerance analysis of an assembly: vector loop and matrix

Mechanical products are usually made by assembling many parts. The dimensional and geometrical variations of each part have to be limited by tolerances able to ensure both a standardized production and a certain level of quality, which is defined by satisfying functional requirements. The appropriate allocation of tolerances among the different parts of an assembly is the fundamental tool to ensure assemblies that work rightly at lower costs. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop a tolerance analysis to satisfy the requirements of the assembly by the tolerances imposed on the single parts. This tool has to be based on a mathematical model able to evaluate the cumulative effect of the single tolerances. Actually, there are some different models used or proposed by the literature to make the tolerance analysis of an assembly, but none of them is completely and univocally accepted. Some authors focus their attention on the solution of single problems found in these models or in their practical application in computer-aided tolerancing systems. But none of them has done an objective and complete comparison among them, analyzing the advantages and the weakness and furnishing a criterion for their choice and application. This paper briefly introduces two of the main models for tolerance analysis, the vector loop and the matrix. In this paper, these models are briefly described and then compared showing their analogies and differences.

[1]  David J. Williams,et al.  THE ASSEMBLY PROCESS FOR ANISOTROPIC CONDUCTIVE JOINTS — SOME NEW EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL RESULTS , 1995 .

[2]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Review of statistical approaches to tolerance analysis , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  Umberto Prisco,et al.  Overview of current CAT systems , 2002, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[4]  Alain Riviere,et al.  A matrix approach to the representation of tolerance zones and clearances , 1997 .

[5]  Kenneth W. Chase,et al.  A SECOND-ORDER METHOD FOR ASSEMBLY TOLERANCE ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[6]  O. W. Salomons,et al.  A computer aided tolerancing tool II: tolerance analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  GLOBAL COORDINATE METHOD FOR DETERMINING SENSITIVITY IN ASSEMBLY TOLERANCE ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[8]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Including Geometric Feature Variations in Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Assemblies , 1996 .

[9]  H.J.J. Kals,et al.  Current status of CAT systems , 1998 .

[10]  Y. S. Hong,et al.  A comprehensive review of tolerancing research , 2002 .

[11]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  A Comparative Study Of Tolerance Analysis Methods , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[12]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments , 1998 .

[13]  Philippe Serré,et al.  The TTRSs : 13 Constraints for Dimensioning and Tolerancing , 1998 .

[14]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Geometric design tolerancing : theories, standards and applications , 1998 .