Effects of lidar post‐spacing and DEM resolution to mean slope estimation

This paper examines the effect of scale (exhibited by spatial sampling) in modeling mean slope from lidar data using two representations of scale: lidar posting density (i.e. post‐spacing) and DEM resolution (i.e. cell size). The study areas selected include six small (i.e. approximately 3 km2) urban drainage basins in Richland County, SC, USA, which share similar hydrologic characteristics. This research spatially sampled an airborne lidar dataset collected in 2000 at a 2 m nominal posting density to simulate lidar posting density at various post‐spacings, from 2 m through 10 m. DEMs were created from the lidar observations at a corresponding cell size using spatial interpolation. Finally, using these DEMs, a sensitivity analysis between modeled terrain slope and lidar post‐spacing was conducted. Results of the sensitivity analyses showed that the deviation between mean slope and modeled mean slope decreases with finer posting density and DEM resolution. The relationship of mean slope with varying cell sizes and post‐spacing suggests a linear and a logarithmic function, respectively, for all study areas. More importantly, cell size has a greater effect on mean slope than lidar posting density. Implications of these results for lumped hydrologic modeling are then postulated.

[1]  Bor-Wen Tsai,et al.  The Effect of DEM Resolution on Slope and Aspect Mapping , 1991 .

[2]  John P. Wilson,et al.  DEM resolution dependencies of terrain attributes across a landscape , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  Determination of grid size for digital terrain modelling in landscape investigations—exemplified by soil moisture distribution at a micro-scale , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Comparison of Angles from Surface Slope/Aspect Algorithms , 1998 .

[5]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  Accuracy of Local Topographic Variables Derived from Digital Elevation Models , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology , 1995 .

[7]  Martin Flood,et al.  Laser altimetry : From science to commercial lidar mapping , 2001 .

[8]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Hill shading and the reflectance map , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  P. Yoeli Cartographic Contouring with Computer and Plotter , 1984 .

[10]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Deriving DSMs from LiDAR data with kriging , 2002 .

[11]  Feras M. Ziadat,et al.  Effect of Contour Intervals and Grid Cell Size on the Accuracy of DEMs and Slope Derivatives , 2007, Trans. GIS.

[12]  A. MacEachren,et al.  Sampling and Isometric Mapping of Continuous Geographic Surfaces , 1987 .

[13]  P. Julien,et al.  Grid-Size Effects on Surface Runoff Modeling , 2000 .

[14]  Glenn E. Moglen,et al.  SPATIALLY EXPLICIT HYDROLOGIC MODELING OF LAND USE CHANGE 1 , 2002 .

[15]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[16]  Kevin J. McMaster Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions , 2002 .

[17]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  What cell size does the computed slope/aspect angle represent? , 1995 .

[18]  R. Bivand,et al.  INTEGRATING MODELS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[19]  Ashton Shortridge,et al.  Lidar Elevation Data for Surface Hydrologic Modeling: Resolution and Representation Issues , 2005 .

[20]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[21]  Jeroen M. Schoorl,et al.  Three-dimensional landscape process modelling : the effect of DEM resolution , 2000 .

[22]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[23]  J. Colby,et al.  Spatial Characterization, Resolution, and Volumetric Change of Coastal Dunes using Airborne LIDAR: Cape Hatteras, North Carolina , 2002 .

[24]  Jay Gao,et al.  Impact of Sampling Intervals on the Reliability of Topographic Variables Mapped from Grid DEMs at a Micro-Scale , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[26]  Jay Gao,et al.  Resolution and Accuracy of Terrain Representation by Grid DEMs at a Micro-Scale , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Alan K. Zundel,et al.  IMPACT OF VARIED DATA RESOLUTION ON HYDRAULIC MODELING AND FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 1 , 2003 .

[28]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Impact of Lidar Nominal Post-spacing on DEM Accuracy and Flood Zone Delineation , 2007 .

[29]  I. Evans Statistical Characterization of Altitude Matrices by Computer. Report 6. An Integrated System of Terrain Analysis and Slope Mapping. , 1979 .

[30]  Stefan Kienzle,et al.  The Effect of DEM Raster Resolution on First Order, Second Order and Compound Terrain Derivatives , 2004, Trans. GIS.

[31]  D. Mackay,et al.  Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model , 2000 .

[32]  Glenn E. Moglen,et al.  Resolution Effects on Hydrologic Modeling Parameters and Peak Discharge , 2001 .

[33]  J. A. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Lidar-derived Elevation and Terrain Slope in Leaf-off Conditions , 2005 .