Finding regions of interest in pathological images: an attentional model approach

This paper introduces an automated method for finding diagnostic regions-of-interest (RoIs) in histopathological images. This method is based on the cognitive process of visual selective attention that arises during a pathologist's image examination. Specifically, it emulates the first examination phase, which consists in a coarse search for tissue structures at a "low zoom" to separate the image into relevant regions.1 The pathologist's cognitive performance depends on inherent image visual cues - bottom-up information - and on acquired clinical medicine knowledge - top-down mechanisms -. Our pathologist's visual attention model integrates the latter two components. The selected bottom-up information includes local low level features such as intensity, color, orientation and texture information. Top-down information is related to the anatomical and pathological structures known by the expert. A coarse approximation to these structures is achieved by an oversegmentation algorithm, inspired by psychological grouping theories. The algorithm parameters are learned from an expert pathologist's segmentation. Top-down and bottom-up integration is achieved by calculating a unique index for each of the low level characteristics inside the region. Relevancy is estimated as a simple average of these indexes. Finally, a binary decision rule defines whether or not a region is interesting. The method was evaluated on a set of 49 images using a perceptually-weighted evaluation criterion, finding a quality gain of 3dB when comparing to a classical bottom-up model of attention.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Feike Willemse,et al.  A colored view on quantitative pathology: aspects of true color image analysis in routine pathology , 1996 .

[3]  Hiroshi Watanabe,et al.  Transcoding by automatic ROI extraction from JPEG2000 bitstream , 2003 .

[4]  L. Broemeling,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Toward a Theory of Qualitative Visual Reasoning in Microanatomy , 2004 .

[6]  Michael J. Becich,et al.  Automated feature extraction and content-based retrieval of pathology microscopic images using k-means clustering and code run-length probability distribution , 2005 .

[7]  M. Wertheimer Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[8]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[9]  Tim W. Nattkemper,et al.  A method for linking computed image features to histological semantics in neuropathology , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Athanassios N. Skodras,et al.  JPEG 2000 ROI CODING IN MEDICAL IMAGING APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[12]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Development of visual diagnostic expertise in pathology , 2001, AMIA.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Paulo Villegas,et al.  Perceptually-weighted evaluation criteria for segmentation masks in video sequences , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Dimitris A. Karras,et al.  Efficient Image Compression of Medical Images Using the Wavelet Transform and Fuzzy c-means Clustering on Regions of Interest , 2000, EUROMICRO.

[16]  Lei Zheng,et al.  AUTOMATED FEATURE EXTRACTION AND CONTENT-BASED , 2005 .