Error Characterization of Sea Surface Salinity Products Using Triple Collocation Analysis

The triple collocation (TC) technique allows the simultaneous calibration of three independent, collocated data sources, while providing an estimate of their accuracy. In this paper, the TC is adapted to validate different salinity data products along the tropical band. The representativeness error (the true variance resolved by the relatively high-resolution systems but not by the relatively low-resolution system) is accounted for in the validation process. A method based on the intercalibration capabilities of TC is used to estimate the representativeness error for each triplet, which is found to impact between 15% and 50% the error estimation of the different products. The method also sorts the different products in terms of their resolving spatiotemporal scales. Six salinity products (sorted from smaller to larger scales) used were: the in situ data from the Global Tropical Moored Buoy Array (TAO), the GLORYS2V3 ocean reanalysis output provided by Copernicus, the satellite-derived Aquarius Level 3 version 4 (AV4) and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) objectively analyzed (SOA) maps, and the climatology maps provided by the World Ocean Atlas (WOA). This calibration study is limited to the year 2013, a year when all the products were available. This validation approach aims to assess the quality of the different salinity products at the satellite-resolved spatiotemporal scales. The results show that, at the AV4 resolved scales, the Aquarius product has an error of 0.17, and outperforms TAO, GLORYS2V3, and the SOA maps. However, at the SOA resolved scales (which are coarser than those of the Aquarius product because of the large OA correlation radii used), the SMOS product has an error of 0.20, slightly lower than that of GLORYS2V3, Aquarius, and TAO. The WOA products show the highest errors. Higher order calibration may lead to a more accurate assessment of the quality of the climatological products.

[1]  Joaquim Ballabrera-Poy,et al.  Enhancing SMOS brightness temperatures over the ocean using the nodal sampling image reconstruction technique , 2016 .

[2]  Bertrand Chapron,et al.  Overview of the First SMOS Sea Surface Salinity Products. Part I: Quality Assessment for the Second Half of 2010 , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Jacqueline Boutin,et al.  SMOS salinity in the subtropical North Atlantic salinity maximum: 2. Two‐dimensional horizontal thermohaline variability , 2015 .

[4]  A. Stoffelen,et al.  On the quality of high‐resolution scatterometer winds , 2011 .

[5]  Jacqueline Boutin,et al.  SMOS salinity in the subtropical North Atlantic salinity maximum: 1. Comparison with Aquarius and in situ salinity , 2014 .

[6]  Adriano Camps,et al.  Nodal Sampling: A New Image Reconstruction Algorithm for SMOS , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Jacqueline Boutin,et al.  Interannual anomalies of SMOS sea surface salinity , 2016 .

[8]  Wenming Lin,et al.  Toward an Improved Wind Quality Control for RapidScat , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Ah Taylor,et al.  Seasonal and year-to-year variations in surface salinity at the 9 north-atlantic ocean weather stations , 1980 .

[10]  A. Stoffelen.  Toward the true near-surface wind speed: Error modeling and calibration using triple collocation , 1998 .

[11]  Jacqueline Boutin,et al.  First Assessment of SMOS Data Over Open Ocean: Part II—Sea Surface Salinity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Marcos Portabella,et al.  On Scatterometer Ocean Stress , 2009 .

[13]  Cecile Cabanes,et al.  Global Eddy-Permitting Ocean Reanalyses and Simulations of the Period 1992 to Present , 2013 .

[14]  Wenming Lin,et al.  ASCAT wind quality under high subcell wind variability conditions , 2015 .

[15]  Joaquim Ballabrera-Poy,et al.  Debiased non-Bayesian retrieval: A novel approach to SMOS Sea Surface Salinity , 2017 .

[16]  Ad Stoffelen,et al.  Spatial variances of wind fields and their relation to second-order structure functions and spectra , 2014 .

[17]  Michael J. McPhaden,et al.  Time and space scales for sea surface salinity in the tropical oceans , 2005 .

[18]  Juliette Mignot,et al.  On the interannual variability of surface salinity in the Atlantic , 2003 .

[19]  A. Turiel,et al.  Detecting the surface salinity signature of Gulf Stream cold-core rings in Aquarius synergistic products , 2015 .

[20]  Claude Frankignoul,et al.  Surface salinity in the Atlantic Ocean (30°S–50°N) , 2007 .

[21]  Joaquim Ballabrera-Poy,et al.  Singularity Power Spectra: A Method to Assess Geophysical Consistency of Gridded Products—Application to Sea-Surface Salinity Remote Sensing Maps , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Tong Lee,et al.  Validating SMAP SSS with in situ measurements , 2017 .

[23]  Wenming Lin,et al.  ASCAT Wind Quality Control Near Rain , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Yann Kerr,et al.  ESA's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Mission: Mission Performance and Operations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  A. Stoffelen,et al.  On mesoscale analysis and ASCAT ambiguity removal , 2016 .

[26]  Raj Kumar,et al.  Assessment of Satellite-Derived Sea Surface Salinity in the Indian Ocean , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[27]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Estimating root mean square errors in remotely sensed soil moisture over continental scale domains , 2013 .

[28]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Towards an integrated soil moisture drought monitor for East Africa , 2012 .

[29]  Hidde Leijnse,et al.  Triple Collocation of Summer Precipitation Retrievals from SEVIRI over Europe with Gridded Rain Gauge and Weather Radar Data , 2012 .

[30]  Joaquim Ballabrera-Poy,et al.  Improving time and space resolution of SMOS salinity maps using multifractal fusion , 2016 .