Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations
暂无分享,去创建一个
Igors Skute | Isabella Hatak | Isabella Hatak | P. Weerd-Nederhof | I. Skute | Petra C. de Weerd-Nederhof | Katarzyna Zalewska-Kurek | Kasia Zalewska-Kurek | Petra Weerd-Nederhof | Petra C de Weerd-Nederhof
[1] Giselle Rampersad,et al. The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework , 2013 .
[2] A. Salter,et al. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .
[3] Claudio Pizzi,et al. Boundary spanning between industry and university: the role of Technology Transfer Centres , 2012 .
[4] Kevin Grant,et al. Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: a bibliometric perspective , 2014, Scientometrics.
[5] Ki-Seok KwonHan,et al. Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2012 .
[6] Junfu Zhang,et al. The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data , 2009 .
[7] M. M. Kessler. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .
[8] Barry Bozeman,et al. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .
[9] Ismael Rafols,et al. Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] M. Meyer. Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? research–based ventures and public support mechanisms , 2003 .
[11] Claudia De Fuentes,et al. Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: the case of Mexico , 2016 .
[12] A. Salter,et al. Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom , 2011 .
[13] Roman M. Lubynsky,et al. Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs , 2016 .
[14] Riccardo Fini,et al. Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives , 2009 .
[15] H. Etzkowitz,et al. The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .
[16] H. Etzkowitz. Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .
[17] Sheila S. Slaughter,et al. UNIVERSITY TRUSTEES AS CHANNELS BETWEEN ACADEME AND INDUSTRY: TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXECUTIVE SCIENCE NETWORK. , 2013, Research policy.
[18] Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al. Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .
[19] T. Åstebro,et al. Does Academic Entrepreneurship Pay , 2013 .
[20] Kornelia Konrad,et al. A dynamic view on interactions between academic spin-offs and their parent organizations , 2013 .
[21] Markus Simeth,et al. What Makes Companies Pursue an Open Science Strategy? , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[22] Manuel Trajtenberg,et al. AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .
[23] M. Deakin,et al. The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective , 2011 .
[24] C. Schultz,et al. Effects of University–Industry Collaboration on Technological Newness of Firms , 2016 .
[25] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.
[26] Gohar Feroz Khan,et al. The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..
[27] Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al. The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis , 2011 .
[28] Isabel Diez-Vial,et al. Research evolution in science parks and incubators: foundations and new trends , 2017, Scientometrics.
[29] Loet Leydesdorff. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? , 2010 .
[30] M. Wright,et al. 30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship , 2011 .
[31] David A. Wolfe,et al. Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo , 2008 .
[32] Silvia Giordano,et al. Modelling the smart city performance , 2012 .
[33] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010 .
[34] O. Williamson. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .
[35] Gohar Feroz Khan,et al. Measuring the triple helix on the web: Longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[36] Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al. FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .
[37] Henry G. Small,et al. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[38] K. Prashant,et al. Managing Strategic Alliances: What Do We Know Now, and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2009 .
[39] Aurora A. C. Teixeira,et al. A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university–industry links , 2012, Scientometrics.
[40] H. Etzkowitz,et al. An Entrepreneurial University Strategy for Renewing a Declining Industrial City: The Norrköping Way , 2012 .
[41] Nobuya Fukugawa,et al. University spillovers into small technology-based firms: channel, mechanism, and geography , 2012 .
[42] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .
[43] H. Etzkowitz. Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .
[44] Manuela Presutti,et al. Distance to Customers, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation in High‐Tech Firms: The Dark Face of Geographical Proximity , 2019, Journal of Small Business Management.
[45] Rosa Grimaldi,et al. How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach , 2017 .
[46] V. Arza. Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America , 2010 .
[47] M. Perkmann,et al. University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .
[48] Claudia De Fuentes,et al. Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico , 2010 .
[49] L. Leydesdorff,et al. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .
[50] Marco Sabbadin. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .
[51] H. Etzkowitz. Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.
[52] Erik E. Lehmann,et al. University spillovers and new firm location , 2005 .
[53] Ammon Salter,et al. The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship , 2011 .
[54] Bruce Tether,et al. Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .
[55] Ed C. M. Noyons,et al. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[56] S. Iammarino,et al. Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry , 2017 .
[57] Dimo Dimov,et al. Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process , 2013 .
[58] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .
[59] Thomas B. Astebro,et al. Startups by Recent University Graduates and their Faculty - Implications for University Entrepreneurship Policy , 2011 .
[60] Erik E. Lehmann,et al. University–industry collaboration and regional wealth , 2016 .
[61] Ludo Waltman,et al. Vos: A New Method for Visualizing Similarities between Objects , 2006, GfKl.
[62] Giovanni Abramo,et al. The role of information asymmetry in the market for university–industry research collaboration , 2011, ArXiv.
[63] M. Miozzo,et al. How does working on university–industry collaborative projects affect science and engineering doctorates’ careers? Evidence from a UK research-based university , 2014, The Journal of Technology Transfer.
[64] A. Link. Capturing Knowledge: Private Gains and Public Gains from University Research Partnerships , 2015 .
[65] P. Adler. Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .
[66] O. Sorenson,et al. Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .
[67] Nina Rosenbusch,et al. Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs , 2011 .
[68] Ludwig Bstieler,et al. Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university-industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea , 2014 .
[69] Attila Varga,et al. Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .
[70] Kyoung-Joo Lee. From Interpersonal Networks to Inter-Organizational Alliances for University-Industry Collaborations in Japan: The Case of the Tokyo Institute of Technology , 2011 .
[71] Nees Jan van Eck,et al. How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[72] V. Arza,et al. Personal ties in university-industry linkages: a case-study from Argentina , 2017 .
[73] Andy Neely,et al. How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System , 2010 .
[74] T. Allen,et al. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .
[75] Virginia Blanco Mazagatos,et al. How Affect Relates to Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda , 2015 .
[76] John Qi Dong,et al. How Central Is Too Central? Organizing Interorganizational Collaboration Networks for Breakthrough Innovation , 2017 .
[77] Mark Jansen,et al. Influence of partner diversity on collaborative public R&D project outcomes : a study of application and commercialization of nanotechnologies in the Netherlands , 2012 .
[78] Joanne Roberts,et al. University-Industry Collaboration: A CoPs Approach to KTPs , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..
[79] P. Kale. Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here? , 2010 .
[80] Gabriela Dutrénit,et al. What are the factors driving university-industry linkages in latecomer firms: evidence from Mexico , 2011 .
[81] Mike Wright,et al. How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective , 2015 .
[82] M. Savona,et al. University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section , 2017 .
[83] Xu Zhang,et al. The inventive activities and collaboration pattern of university–industry–government in China based on patent analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.
[84] Herman Aguinis,et al. Using Experience Sampling Methodology to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory and Research , 2010 .
[85] Isabella Hatak,et al. Business freedom, corruption and the performance of trusting cooperation partners: empirical findings from six European countries , 2015 .
[86] M. Klofsten,et al. Creating entrepreneurial networks: academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education , 2012 .
[87] O. W. Maietta,et al. Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry , 2015 .
[88] Maryann Feldman,et al. Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[89] Pablo D'Este,et al. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .
[90] Stéphane Robin,et al. Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany , 2013 .
[91] A. Marcovich,et al. From the Triple Helix to a Quadruple Helix? The Case of Dip-Pen Nanolithography , 2011 .
[92] S. Breschi,et al. Set Them Free: Scientists' Evaluations of the Benefits and Costs of University-Industry Research Collaboration , 2012 .
[93] Richard R. Nelson,et al. On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .
[94] Rudi Bekkers,et al. Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers , 2011 .
[95] Sonali K. Shah,et al. Parting the ivory curtain: understanding how universities support a diverse set of startups , 2014 .
[96] Mike Wright,et al. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .
[97] Mike Thelwall,et al. Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK , 2014, Scientometrics.
[98] Federica Rossi,et al. Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions , 2013 .
[99] M. Perkmann,et al. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .
[100] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs , 2011 .
[101] Valentina Morandi,et al. The management of industry–university joint research projects: how do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? , 2013 .
[102] Riccardo Fini,et al. Complements or Substitutes? The Role of Universities and Local Context in Supporting the Creation of Academic Spin-offs , 2010 .
[103] F. Schmidt,et al. General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[104] Freiberger Arbeitspapiere,et al. Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics , 2005 .
[105] H. Etzkowitz. Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix , 2011 .
[106] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .
[107] Daniel L. Fay,et al. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.
[108] Jiancheng Guan,et al. The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .
[109] L. Zucker,et al. Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[110] T. Davey,et al. Does context matter in academic entrepreneurship? The role of barriers and drivers in the regional and national context , 2016 .
[111] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[112] Rudi Bekkers,et al. Analysing preferences for knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .
[113] Mike Wright,et al. Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .
[114] T. Burgess,et al. Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit , 2013 .
[115] A. Geuna,et al. The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2009 .
[116] Mark S. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.
[117] Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez,et al. Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations , 2004 .
[118] Pablo D'Este,et al. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .
[119] A. Salter,et al. Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .
[120] Xiao Feng,et al. Simulating Industry: a holistic approach for bridging the gap between engineering education and industry. Part I:A conceptual framework and methodology , 2015 .
[121] Bart Van Looy,et al. Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research , 2014, Scientometrics.
[122] G. Dutrénit,et al. Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit , 2012 .
[123] E. Carayannis,et al. Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development , 2011 .
[124] Alice Lam,et al. What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? , 2011 .
[125] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2011, Scientometrics.
[126] Giovanni Abramo,et al. University-industry research collaboration: a model to assess university capability , 2011, ArXiv.
[127] Mike Wright,et al. An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups , 2017 .
[128] Ugo Rizzo,et al. Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context , 2015 .
[129] Edwin Mansfield,et al. Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .
[130] Koenraad Debackere,et al. The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .
[131] V. Grinevich,et al. Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship , 2017 .
[132] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.
[133] Mark S. Granovetter. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.
[134] E. Mansfield. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .
[135] K. Frenken,et al. Innovation, spillovers, and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach , 2010 .
[136] Knowledge transfer activities of scientists in nanotechnology , 2018 .
[137] J. Delgado‐García,et al. How Affect Relates to Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda , 2015 .
[138] A. Neely,et al. Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .
[139] I. Feller. Assessing the societal impact of publicly funded research , 2017 .
[140] Leonard Holmes,et al. Competing perspectives on graduate employability: possession, position or process? , 2013 .
[141] D. Iacobucci,et al. Project failures and innovation performance in university–firm collaborations , 2017 .
[142] Mike Wright,et al. Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink? , 2015 .
[143] E. Berman,et al. Explaining the move toward the market in US academic science: how institutional logics can change without institutional entrepreneurs , 2012 .
[144] M. Fischer,et al. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .
[145] Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .
[146] Andrea Pozzali,et al. The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities , 2013 .
[147] Johan P. Larsson,et al. Location Choices of Graduate Entrepreneurs , 2017 .
[148] Ludo Waltman,et al. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.
[149] Mateja Drnovsek,et al. Determinants and public policy implications of academic-industry knowledge transfer in life sciences: a review and a conceptual framework , 2016 .
[150] B. Looy,et al. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .
[151] Thomas Baaken,et al. University–Industry Linkage Evolution: An Empirical Investigation of Relational Success Factors , 2013 .
[152] A. M. Subramanian,et al. When do firms benefit from university–industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination , 2014 .
[153] Maryse M.H. Chappin,et al. Evaluating innovation networks in emerging technologies , 2011 .
[154] S. Zahra,et al. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .
[155] A. Cervera,et al. University–industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: an empirical analysis in a Spanish University , 2012 .
[156] Scott Shane,et al. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .