Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations

The substantial acknowledgement of university–industry (U–I) collaborations as promotor of economic progress, innovativeness and competitiveness fostered a continuous research engagement. At the same time, the U–I literature experienced a notable increase in the past decade, transforming into a multi-faceted and ambiguous research field, characterised by highly complex interlinks. The recent transformation hinders a comprehensive understanding of the latest developments in research directions and their clear delineation. Therefore, the purpose of this bibliometric literature review is to examine the evolution of the field and identify the primary emerging patterns. This paper employs co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling techniques to analyse the U–I publications dataset. The findings indicate that the U–I collaborations research can be systematically clustered, resulting in an interconnected ecosystem consisting of three levels: individual, organisational and institutional, respectively. Thus, this review presents the immense contribution that the analysis of U–I collaborations makes to various research streams. Building on these findings and employing qualitative content analysis on the clustered publications, the paper develops a research agenda that encourages future investigations of previously overlooked features of U–I collaborations in general, and their role across levels of analysis, contexts and stages of the collaboration process in particular.

[1]  Giselle Rampersad,et al.  The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework , 2013 .

[2]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[3]  Claudio Pizzi,et al.  Boundary spanning between industry and university: the role of Technology Transfer Centres , 2012 .

[4]  Kevin Grant,et al.  Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: a bibliometric perspective , 2014, Scientometrics.

[5]  Ki-Seok KwonHan,et al.  Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2012 .

[6]  Junfu Zhang,et al.  The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data , 2009 .

[7]  M. M. Kessler Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .

[8]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[9]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  M. Meyer Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? research–based ventures and public support mechanisms , 2003 .

[11]  Claudia De Fuentes,et al.  Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: the case of Mexico , 2016 .

[12]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[13]  Roman M. Lubynsky,et al.  Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs , 2016 .

[14]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives , 2009 .

[15]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[16]  H. Etzkowitz Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[17]  Sheila S. Slaughter,et al.  UNIVERSITY TRUSTEES AS CHANNELS BETWEEN ACADEME AND INDUSTRY: TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXECUTIVE SCIENCE NETWORK. , 2013, Research policy.

[18]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[19]  T. Åstebro,et al.  Does Academic Entrepreneurship Pay , 2013 .

[20]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  A dynamic view on interactions between academic spin-offs and their parent organizations , 2013 .

[21]  Markus Simeth,et al.  What Makes Companies Pursue an Open Science Strategy? , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .

[23]  M. Deakin,et al.  The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective , 2011 .

[24]  C. Schultz,et al.  Effects of University–Industry Collaboration on Technological Newness of Firms , 2016 .

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.

[26]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Isabel Diez-Vial,et al.  Research evolution in science parks and incubators: foundations and new trends , 2017, Scientometrics.

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? , 2010 .

[30]  M. Wright,et al.  30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[31]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo , 2008 .

[32]  Silvia Giordano,et al.  Modelling the smart city performance , 2012 .

[33]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010 .

[34]  O. Williamson Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[35]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Measuring the triple helix on the web: Longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[37]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[38]  K. Prashant,et al.  Managing Strategic Alliances: What Do We Know Now, and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2009 .

[39]  Aurora A. C. Teixeira,et al.  A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university–industry links , 2012, Scientometrics.

[40]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  An Entrepreneurial University Strategy for Renewing a Declining Industrial City: The Norrköping Way , 2012 .

[41]  Nobuya Fukugawa,et al.  University spillovers into small technology-based firms: channel, mechanism, and geography , 2012 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[43]  H. Etzkowitz Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[44]  Manuela Presutti,et al.  Distance to Customers, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation in High‐Tech Firms: The Dark Face of Geographical Proximity , 2019, Journal of Small Business Management.

[45]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach , 2017 .

[46]  V. Arza Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America , 2010 .

[47]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[48]  Claudia De Fuentes,et al.  Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico , 2010 .

[49]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[50]  Marco Sabbadin Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .

[51]  H. Etzkowitz Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[52]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University spillovers and new firm location , 2005 .

[53]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[54]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .

[55]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[56]  S. Iammarino,et al.  Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry , 2017 .

[57]  Dimo Dimov,et al.  Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process , 2013 .

[58]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .

[59]  Thomas B. Astebro,et al.  Startups by Recent University Graduates and their Faculty - Implications for University Entrepreneurship Policy , 2011 .

[60]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University–industry collaboration and regional wealth , 2016 .

[61]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Vos: A New Method for Visualizing Similarities between Objects , 2006, GfKl.

[62]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The role of information asymmetry in the market for university–industry research collaboration , 2011, ArXiv.

[63]  M. Miozzo,et al.  How does working on university–industry collaborative projects affect science and engineering doctorates’ careers? Evidence from a UK research-based university , 2014, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[64]  A. Link Capturing Knowledge: Private Gains and Public Gains from University Research Partnerships , 2015 .

[65]  P. Adler Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .

[66]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[67]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs , 2011 .

[68]  Ludwig Bstieler,et al.  Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university-industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea , 2014 .

[69]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[70]  Kyoung-Joo Lee From Interpersonal Networks to Inter-Organizational Alliances for University-Industry Collaborations in Japan: The Case of the Tokyo Institute of Technology , 2011 .

[71]  Nees Jan van Eck,et al.  How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[72]  V. Arza,et al.  Personal ties in university-industry linkages: a case-study from Argentina , 2017 .

[73]  Andy Neely,et al.  How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System , 2010 .

[74]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[75]  Virginia Blanco Mazagatos,et al.  How Affect Relates to Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda , 2015 .

[76]  John Qi Dong,et al.  How Central Is Too Central? Organizing Interorganizational Collaboration Networks for Breakthrough Innovation , 2017 .

[77]  Mark Jansen,et al.  Influence of partner diversity on collaborative public R&D project outcomes : a study of application and commercialization of nanotechnologies in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[78]  Joanne Roberts,et al.  University-Industry Collaboration: A CoPs Approach to KTPs , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[79]  P. Kale Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here? , 2010 .

[80]  Gabriela Dutrénit,et al.  What are the factors driving university-industry linkages in latecomer firms: evidence from Mexico , 2011 .

[81]  Mike Wright,et al.  How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective , 2015 .

[82]  M. Savona,et al.  University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section , 2017 .

[83]  Xu Zhang,et al.  The inventive activities and collaboration pattern of university–industry–government in China based on patent analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.

[84]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Using Experience Sampling Methodology to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory and Research , 2010 .

[85]  Isabella Hatak,et al.  Business freedom, corruption and the performance of trusting cooperation partners: empirical findings from six European countries , 2015 .

[86]  M. Klofsten,et al.  Creating entrepreneurial networks: academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education , 2012 .

[87]  O. W. Maietta,et al.  Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry , 2015 .

[88]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[89]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[90]  Stéphane Robin,et al.  Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany , 2013 .

[91]  A. Marcovich,et al.  From the Triple Helix to a Quadruple Helix? The Case of Dip-Pen Nanolithography , 2011 .

[92]  S. Breschi,et al.  Set Them Free: Scientists' Evaluations of the Benefits and Costs of University-Industry Research Collaboration , 2012 .

[93]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[94]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers , 2011 .

[95]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  Parting the ivory curtain: understanding how universities support a diverse set of startups , 2014 .

[96]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[97]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK , 2014, Scientometrics.

[98]  Federica Rossi,et al.  Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions , 2013 .

[99]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[100]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs , 2011 .

[101]  Valentina Morandi,et al.  The management of industry–university joint research projects: how do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? , 2013 .

[102]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Complements or Substitutes? The Role of Universities and Local Context in Supporting the Creation of Academic Spin-offs , 2010 .

[103]  F. Schmidt,et al.  General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[104]  Freiberger Arbeitspapiere,et al.  Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics , 2005 .

[105]  H. Etzkowitz Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix , 2011 .

[106]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[107]  Daniel L. Fay,et al.  Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[108]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[109]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  T. Davey,et al.  Does context matter in academic entrepreneurship? The role of barriers and drivers in the regional and national context , 2016 .

[111]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[112]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing preferences for knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[113]  Mike Wright,et al.  Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .

[114]  T. Burgess,et al.  Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit , 2013 .

[115]  A. Geuna,et al.  The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[116]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[117]  Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez,et al.  Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations , 2004 .

[118]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .

[119]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[120]  Xiao Feng,et al.  Simulating Industry: a holistic approach for bridging the gap between engineering education and industry. Part I:A conceptual framework and methodology , 2015 .

[121]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research , 2014, Scientometrics.

[122]  G. Dutrénit,et al.  Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit , 2012 .

[123]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development , 2011 .

[124]  Alice Lam,et al.  What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? , 2011 .

[125]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2011, Scientometrics.

[126]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  University-industry research collaboration: a model to assess university capability , 2011, ArXiv.

[127]  Mike Wright,et al.  An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups , 2017 .

[128]  Ugo Rizzo,et al.  Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context , 2015 .

[129]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[130]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[131]  V. Grinevich,et al.  Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[132]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[133]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[134]  E. Mansfield Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[135]  K. Frenken,et al.  Innovation, spillovers, and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach , 2010 .

[136]  Knowledge transfer activities of scientists in nanotechnology , 2018 .

[137]  J. Delgado‐García,et al.  How Affect Relates to Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda , 2015 .

[138]  A. Neely,et al.  Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[139]  I. Feller Assessing the societal impact of publicly funded research , 2017 .

[140]  Leonard Holmes,et al.  Competing perspectives on graduate employability: possession, position or process? , 2013 .

[141]  D. Iacobucci,et al.  Project failures and innovation performance in university–firm collaborations , 2017 .

[142]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink? , 2015 .

[143]  E. Berman,et al.  Explaining the move toward the market in US academic science: how institutional logics can change without institutional entrepreneurs , 2012 .

[144]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[145]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[146]  Andrea Pozzali,et al.  The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities , 2013 .

[147]  Johan P. Larsson,et al.  Location Choices of Graduate Entrepreneurs , 2017 .

[148]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[149]  Mateja Drnovsek,et al.  Determinants and public policy implications of academic-industry knowledge transfer in life sciences: a review and a conceptual framework , 2016 .

[150]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[151]  Thomas Baaken,et al.  University–Industry Linkage Evolution: An Empirical Investigation of Relational Success Factors , 2013 .

[152]  A. M. Subramanian,et al.  When do firms benefit from university–industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination , 2014 .

[153]  Maryse M.H. Chappin,et al.  Evaluating innovation networks in emerging technologies , 2011 .

[154]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[155]  A. Cervera,et al.  University–industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: an empirical analysis in a Spanish University , 2012 .

[156]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .