Big Data and Machine Learning to Improve European Grapevine Moth (Lobesia botrana) Predictions

Machine Learning (ML) techniques can be used to convert Big Data into valuable information for agri-environmental applications, such as predictive pest modeling. Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) 1775 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is one of the main pests of grapevine, causing high productivity losses in some vineyards worldwide. This work focuses on the optimization of the Touzeau model, a classical correlation model between temperature and L. botrana development using data-driven models. Data collected from field observations were combined with 30 GB of registered weather data updated every 30 min to train the ML models and make predictions on this pest’s flights, as well as to assess the accuracy of both Touzeau and ML models. The results obtained highlight a much higher F1 score of the ML models in comparison with the Touzeau model. The best-performing model was an artificial neural network of four layers, which considered several variables together and not only the temperature, taking advantage of the ability of ML models to find relationships in nonlinear systems. Despite the room for improvement of artificial intelligence-based models, the process and results presented herein highlight the benefits of ML applied to agricultural pest management strategies.

[1]  V. Chedea,et al.  The Effects of Climate Change on the Activity of the Lobesia botrana and Eupoecilia ambiguella Moths on the Grapevine Cultivars from the Târnave Vineyard , 2022, Sustainability.

[2]  Miko laj Sitarz,et al.  Extending F1 metric, probabilistic approach , 2022, Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

[3]  Anesmar Olino de Albuquerque,et al.  Comparing Machine and Deep Learning Methods for the Phenology-Based Classification of Land Cover Types in the Amazon Biome Using Sentinel-1 Time Series , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[4]  L. Rossini,et al.  A Physiologically Based ODE Model for an Old Pest: Modeling Life Cycle and Population Dynamics of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) , 2022, Agronomy.

[5]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Machine Learning for Detection and Prediction of Crop Diseases and Pests: A Comprehensive Survey , 2022, Agriculture.

[6]  Jorge Miguel Ferreira da Silva Mendes,et al.  VineInspector: The Vineyard Assistant , 2022, Agriculture.

[7]  Semi physical growth model of Lobesia botrana under laboratory conditions for Argentina’s Cuyo region , 2022, Ecological Modelling.

[8]  Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré,et al.  Grapevine Phenology Prediction: A Comparison of Physical and Machine Learning Models , 2022, DaWaK.

[9]  E. Marchesini,et al.  One device for two pests: a new double dispenser for mating disruption of Lobesia botrana and Planococcus ficus , 2021, Entomologia Generalis.

[10]  I. Ciampitti,et al.  An integrated approach of field, weather, and satellite data for monitoring maize phenology , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[11]  A. Alma,et al.  Models Applied to Grapevine Pests: A Review , 2021, Insects.

[12]  Gianni Fenu,et al.  Forecasting Plant and Crop Disease: An Explorative Study on Current Algorithms , 2021, Big Data Cogn. Comput..

[13]  Javier Tardáguila,et al.  Deep learning for the differentiation of downy mildew and spider mite in grapevine under field conditions , 2021, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[14]  Salinda Buyamin,et al.  A greedy approach to improve pesticide application for precision agriculture using model predictive control , 2021, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[15]  M. Picanço,et al.  Risk of the introduction of Lobesia botrana in suitable areas for Vitis vinifera , 2020, Journal of Pest Science.

[16]  Wei Zhou,et al.  The Relationships Among Longitude, Latitude and Elevation of Occurrence of Parocneria orienta Chao (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in China , 2020, Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society.

[17]  L. Leolini,et al.  A Review of the Potential Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Options for European Viticulture , 2020 .

[18]  O. Musshoff,et al.  Understanding the adoption of smartphone apps in crop protection , 2020, Precision Agriculture.

[19]  Victoria Beltran,et al.  Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[20]  L. Rossini,et al.  EntoSim, a ROOT-based simulator to forecast insects’ life cycle: Description and application in the case of Lobesia botrana , 2020 .

[21]  J. Moreau,et al.  Reproductive performance of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Tortricidae) is adversely affected by warming scenario , 2020, Journal of Pest Science.

[22]  Sergio Ilarri,et al.  Multifactorial Evolutionary Prediction of Phenology and Pests: Can Machine Learning Help? , 2020, WEBIST.

[23]  J. Nathan Kutz,et al.  Data-driven modeling and learning in science and engineering , 2019, Comptes Rendus Mécanique.

[24]  G. Benelli,et al.  Sex Pheromone Aerosol Devices for Mating Disruption: Challenges for a Brighter Future , 2019, Insects.

[25]  G. Benelli,et al.  Managing the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, through pheromone-mediated mating disruption , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[26]  C Kamphuis,et al.  Invited review: Big Data in precision dairy farming , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[27]  B. Lechner,et al.  The entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae for the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its effect to the phytopathogenic fungus, Botrytis cinerea , 2018, Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control.

[28]  Kah Phooi Seng,et al.  Big data and machine learning for crop protection , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[29]  B. Bagnoli,et al.  Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  Andreas Kamilaris,et al.  Deep learning in agriculture: A survey , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[31]  X. Phạm,et al.  How data analytics is transforming agriculture , 2018 .

[32]  Andreas Kamilaris,et al.  A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[33]  G. Gilioli,et al.  Climate warming effects on grape and grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) in the Palearctic region , 2017 .

[34]  Μ. Tzanakakis,et al.  Induction of dormancy in Lobesia botrana by long day and high temperature conditions , 2017 .

[35]  Sander Janssen,et al.  Analysis of Big Data technologies for use in agro-environmental science , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[36]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Modelling interannual variation in the spring and autumn land surface phenology of the European forest , 2016 .

[37]  S. Iranipour,et al.  Temperature-dependent age-specific demography of grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): jackknife vs. bootstrap techniques , 2016 .

[38]  A. Akyuz Growing degree day calculation method comparison between two methods in the northern edge of the US Corn Belt , 2015 .

[39]  Sergio A. Velastin,et al.  F1 score assesment of gaussian mixture background subtraction algorithms using the MuHAVi dataset , 2015, ICDP.

[40]  C. Nansen,et al.  Optimizing pesticide spray coverage using a novel web and smartphone tool, SnapCard , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[41]  Erich-Christian Oerke,et al.  Precision Crop Protection - the Challenge and Use of Heterogeneity , 2014 .

[42]  R. Ma,et al.  Sex-Pheromone-Mediated Mating Disruption Technology for the Oriental Fruit Moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Overview and Prospects , 2014 .

[43]  Gerrit Hoogenboom,et al.  Weather-based pest forecasting for efficient crop protection , 2014 .

[44]  E. Cargnus,et al.  Influence of the carpophagous generations of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana on grape bunch rots , 2014, Phytoparasitica.

[45]  G. Gilioli,et al.  Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.) in California , 2012 .

[46]  V. Rossi,et al.  Modelling the impact of climate change on the interaction between grapevine and its pests and pathogens: European grapevine moth and powdery mildew , 2012 .

[47]  Radoslav Harman,et al.  A new model for predicting the flight activity of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) , 2011 .

[48]  Hongyan Xu,et al.  Nonlinear Optimization of GM(1, 1) Model Based on Multi-parameter Background Value , 2011, CCTA.

[49]  Eduardo Sáenz-de-Cabezón,et al.  A computer implementation of the partition of the unity procedure and its application to arthropod population dynamics. A case study on the European grape berry moth , 2011, Math. Comput. Simul..

[50]  A. Sarafrazi,et al.  Population variation of codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lep.; Tortricidae) based on molecular data from northwestern Iran , 2011, Turkish Journal of Zoology.

[51]  D. Martín-Vertedor,et al.  Global warming affects phenology and voltinism of Lobesia botrana in Spain , 2010 .

[52]  Tito Caffi,et al.  Modelling plant diseases for decision making in crop protection , 2010 .

[53]  Kai Ming Ting,et al.  Confusion Matrix , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[54]  Philipp Kirsch,et al.  Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest Management , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[55]  R. Ocete,et al.  Forecasting the flight activity of Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Southwestern Spain , 2009 .

[56]  Sanyi Tang,et al.  Models for integrated pest control and their biological implications. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[57]  F Fabre,et al.  Financial benefit of using crop protection decision rules over systematic spraying strategies. , 2007, Phytopathology.

[58]  Dennis D. Calvin,et al.  A developmental database to support insect phenology models , 2007 .

[59]  A. Davison,et al.  Bayesian forecasting of grape moth emergence , 2006 .

[60]  P. Milonas,et al.  Cold hardiness of diapausing and non‐diapausing pupae of the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana , 2005 .

[61]  T. Moschos Yield loss quantification and assessment of economic injury level for the anthophagous generation of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana Den. et Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) , 2005 .

[62]  S. Welter,et al.  Pheromone mating disruption offers selective management options for key pests , 2005 .

[63]  Nikos E. Roditakis,et al.  Effects of photoperiod and temperature on pupal diapause induction of grape berry moth Lobesia botrana , 2001 .

[64]  P. Milonas,et al.  Day‐degree models for predicting the generation time and flight activity of local populations of Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.) (Lep., Tortricidae) in Greece , 2001 .

[65]  R. Ocete,et al.  Study of the relationship between sex pheromone trap catches of Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.) (Lep., Tortricidae) and the accumulation of degree‐days in Sherry vineyards (SW of Spain) , 2001 .

[66]  S. Wratten,et al.  Biological Control: Measures of Success , 2000, Springer Netherlands.

[67]  R. Bonhomme,et al.  Bases and limits to using 'degree.day' units , 2000 .

[68]  J. C. van Lenteren,et al.  Success in Biological Control of Arthropods by Augmentation of Natural Enemies , 2000 .

[69]  J. Brière,et al.  Comparison of Temperature-Dependent Growth Models with the Development of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) , 1998 .

[70]  John D. Mumford,et al.  Decision Support Systems in Crop Protection , 1994 .

[71]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Modeling and simulation in agricultural pest management , 1987 .

[72]  B. Gabel,et al.  A functional simulation of European vine moth Lobesia botrana Den. et Schiff. (Lep., Tortricidae) population development , 1986 .

[73]  D. R. Walker,et al.  A Model for Estimating the Completion of Rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ Peach Trees1 , 1974, HortScience.

[74]  Ray F. Smith,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF , 1959 .

[75]  F. Stellwaag Die Weinbauinsekten der Kulturländer : Lehr- und Handbuch , 1928 .