Chapter 9 Molecular Similarity: Advances in Methods, Applications and Validations in Virtual Screening and QSAR
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert C. Glen | Jeremy L. Jenkins | Andreas Bender | Samuel E. Adams | Edward O. Cannon | Qingliang Li | R. Glen | A. Bender | J. Jenkins | Qingliang Li | Sam E. Adams
[1] Harald Mauser,et al. Database Clustering with a Combination of Fingerprint and Maximum Common Substructure Methods , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[2] Andreas Bender,et al. Similarity Searching of Chemical Databases Using Atom Environment Descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of Performance , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[3] A. Tropsha,et al. Development and validation of k-nearest-neighbor QSPR models of metabolic stability of drug candidates. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] Alexander Golbraikh,et al. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[5] Zheng Rong Yang,et al. Evaluation of Mutual Information and Genetic Programming for Feature Selection in QSAR , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[6] E. Butcher. Can cell systems biology rescue drug discovery? , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[7] Ying Liu,et al. A Comparative Study on Feature Selection Methods for Drug Discovery , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[8] G. Schneider,et al. Fuzzy pharmacophore models from molecular alignments for correlation-vector-based virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[9] Didier Rognan,et al. Design of small-sized libraries by combinatorial assembly of linkers and functional groups to a given scaffold: application to the structure-based optimization of a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[10] A. Tropsha,et al. Beware of q 2 , 2002 .
[11] Shaomeng Wang,et al. An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[12] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Multiple-ligand-based virtual screening: methods and applications of the MTree approach. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[13] R. Glen,et al. Screening for Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors Using MOLPRINT 2D, a Fast Fragment-Based Method Employing the Naïve Bayesian Classifier: Limitations of the Descriptor and the Importance of Balanced Chemistry in Training and Test Sets , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[14] W. Guida,et al. The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.
[15] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Evaluating the High-Throughput Screening Computations , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[16] Yi-Zeng Liang,et al. New Approach by Kriging Models to Problems in QSAR , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[17] Paul Watson,et al. Virtual Screening Using Protein-Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[18] Matthew P Jacobson,et al. Virtual Ligand Screening against Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase: Improving Docking Enrichment Using Physics-Based Methods , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[19] D. Rogers,et al. Using Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints with Laplacian-Modified Bayesian Analysis in High-Throughput Screening Follow-Up , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[20] G. Schneider,et al. Comparison of Three Holographic Fingerprint Descriptors and their Binary Counterparts , 2005 .
[21] Maria A Miteva,et al. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[22] Jérôme Hert,et al. Comparison of Fingerprint-Based Methods for Virtual Screening Using Multiple Bioactive Reference Structures , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[23] Andreas Evers,et al. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[24] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[25] Andreas Bender,et al. A Discussion of Measures of Enrichment in Virtual Screening: Comparing the Information Content of Descriptors with Increasing Levels of Sophistication , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] Gisbert Schneider,et al. A Hierarchical Clustering Approach for Large Compound Libraries , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[27] David Vidal,et al. LINGO, an Efficient Holographic Text Based Method To Calculate Biophysical Properties and Intermolecular Similarities , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[28] Marvin Johnson,et al. Concepts and applications of molecular similarity , 1990 .
[29] Alexander Tropsha,et al. Novel Variable Selection Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach Based on the k-Nearest-Neighbor Principle , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[30] Mark T. D. Cronin,et al. The better predictive model: High q2 for the training set or low root mean square error of prediction for the test set? , 2005 .
[31] Knut Baumann,et al. Chance Correlation in Variable Subset Regression: Influence of the Objective Function, the Selection Mechanism, and Ensemble Averaging , 2005 .
[32] A. Tropsha,et al. Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[33] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Ensemble Methods for Classification in Cheminformatics , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[34] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. POT-DMC: A virtual screening method for the identification of potent hits. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[35] Peter C Jurs,et al. Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[36] Tatsuya Akutsu,et al. Graph Kernels for Molecular Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis with Support Vector Machines , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[37] A. Fliri,et al. Biospectra analysis: model proteome characterizations for linking molecular structure and biological response. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[38] J. Jenkins,et al. A 3D similarity method for scaffold hopping from known drugs or natural ligands to new chemotypes. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[39] F. Burden,et al. Robust QSAR models using Bayesian regularized neural networks. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[40] G. Klebe,et al. Successful virtual screening for a submicromolar antagonist of the neurokinin-1 receptor based on a ligand-supported homology model. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] S. L. Dixon,et al. One-dimensional molecular representations and similarity calculations: methodology and validation. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[42] John J Irwin,et al. Here Be Dragons: Docking and Screening in an Uncharted Region of Chemical Space , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[43] Y. Kurogi,et al. Pharmacophore modeling and three-dimensional database searching for drug design using catalyst. , 2001, Current medicinal chemistry.
[44] Ferran Sanz,et al. Anchor-GRIND: filling the gap between standard 3D QSAR and the GRid-INdependent descriptors. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[45] John M. Barnard,et al. Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[46] Peter Willett,et al. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Virtual Screening by Fusing Nearest Neighbor Lists: A Comparison of Similarity Coefficients , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[47] Rajarshi Guha,et al. Determining the Validity of a QSAR Model - A Classification Approach , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[48] Ling Yang,et al. An in silico approach for screening flavonoids as P-glycoprotein inhibitors based on a Bayesian-regularized neural network , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[49] Peter Gedeck,et al. Use of the R-group descriptor for alignment-free QSAR , 2005 .
[50] David A Winkler,et al. Predictive Bayesian neural network models of MHC class II peptide binding. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[51] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game? , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[52] E. Jaeger,et al. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
[53] N. Nikolova,et al. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, LUMO energy ± The Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) , 2022 .
[54] Peter Tiño,et al. Nonlinear Prediction of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[55] David J Diller,et al. Fast small molecule similarity searching with multiple alignment profiles of molecules represented in one-dimension. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[56] Gunnar Rätsch,et al. Classifying 'Drug-likeness' with Kernel-Based Learning Methods , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[57] Jing Li,et al. Novel Statistical Approach for Primary High-Throughput Screening Hit Selection , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[58] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[59] Ismael Zamora,et al. Virtual Screening and Scaffold Hopping Based on GRID Molecular Interaction Fields , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[60] R. Glen,et al. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[61] Douglas M. Hawkins,et al. The Problem of Overfitting , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[62] Sudhir A. Kulkarni,et al. Three-Dimensional QSAR Using the k-Nearest Neighbor Method and Its Interpretation , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[63] Iain M. McLay,et al. Retrospective Docking Study of PDE4B Ligands and an Analysis of the Behavior of Selected Scoring Functions , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[64] Michael K. Gilson,et al. Virtual Screening of Molecular Databases Using a Support Vector Machine , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[65] H. Kubinyi,et al. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[66] David W Salt,et al. Judging the significance of multiple linear regression models. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[67] Stuart L. Schreiber,et al. Identifying Biologically Active Compound Classes Using Phenotypic Screening Data and Sampling Statistics , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] Mahdi Mahfouf,et al. Clustering Files of Chemical Structures Using the Fuzzy k-Means Clustering Method , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[69] Jonathan D Hirst,et al. Application of non-parametric regression to quantitative structure-activity relationships. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[70] Jens Sadowski,et al. Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Systems for Drug/Nondrug Classification , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[71] Andrew I Su,et al. HierS: hierarchical scaffold clustering using topological chemical graphs. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[72] Janet M Thornton,et al. Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[73] Ting Wang,et al. Boosting: An Ensemble Learning Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[74] Jens Sadowski,et al. "In-House Likeness": Comparison of Large Compound Collections Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[75] Nadine H. Elowe,et al. Experimental Screening of Dihydrofolate Reductase Yields a “Test Set” of 50,000 Small Molecules for a Computational Data-Mining and Docking Competition , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[76] C. Springer,et al. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[77] Darren V. S. Green,et al. The Reduced Graph Descriptor in Virtual Screening and Data-Driven Clustering of High-Throughput Screening Data , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[78] Gang Chen,et al. A New Rapid and Effective Chemistry Space Filter in Recognizing a Druglike Database , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[79] Joanna Jaworska,et al. Improving Opportunities for Regulatory Acceptance of QSARs: The Importance of Model Domain, Uncertainty, Validity and Predictability , 2003 .
[80] Jiahua Wu,et al. Extracting the three-dimensional shape of live pigs using stereo photogrammetry , 2004 .
[81] Thierry Langer,et al. Discovery of high-affinity ligands of σ1 receptor, ERG2, and emopamil binding protein by pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening , 2005 .
[82] Thierry Langer,et al. Discovery of high-affinity ligands of sigma1 receptor, ERG2, and emopamil binding protein by pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[83] Hao Chen,et al. Virtual Screening of Novel Noncovalent Inhibitors for SARS-CoV 3C-like Proteinase , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[84] U. Lessel,et al. In vitro and in silico affinity fingerprints: Finding similarities beyond structural classes , 2000 .
[85] Christian N Parker,et al. McMaster University Data-Mining and Docking Competition , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[86] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[87] E. Brown,et al. High throughput screening identifies novel inhibitors of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase that are competitive with dihydrofolate. , 2003, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[88] Johann Gasteiger,et al. Fingal: A Novel Approach to Geometric Fingerprinting and a Comparative Study of Its Application to 3D‐QSAR Modelling , 2005 .
[89] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Similarity to Molecules in the Training Set Is a Good Discriminator for Prediction Accuracy in QSAR , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[90] P. Willett,et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbor information. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[91] Chong Hak Chae,et al. Novel Receptor Surface Approach for 3D-QSAR: The Weighted Probe Interaction Energy Method , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[92] M. Glick,et al. Prioritization of high throughput screening data of compound mixtures using molecular similarity , 2003 .
[93] Shaomeng Wang,et al. How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[94] S. Pickett,et al. GRid-INdependent descriptors (GRIND): a novel class of alignment-independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[95] Miklos Feher,et al. The Use of Consensus Scoring in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[96] G. Schneider,et al. Extraction and visualization of potential pharmacophore points using support vector machines: application to ligand-based virtual screening for COX-2 inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[97] P. Goodford. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[98] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Combinatorial Preferences Affect Molecular Similarity/Diversity Calculations Using Binary Fingerprints and Tanimoto Coefficients , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[99] Ferran Sanz,et al. Incorporating molecular shape into the alignment-free Grid-Independent Descriptors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[100] Petra Schneider,et al. Comparison of correlation vector methods for ligand-based similarity searching , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[101] J. G. Vinter,et al. Scaffold hopping with molecular field points: identification of a cholecystokinin-2 (CCK2) receptor pharmacophore and its use in the design of a prototypical series of pyrrole- and imidazole-based CCK2 antagonists. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[102] Douglas M. Hawkins,et al. Assessing Model Fit by Cross-Validation , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[103] David A. Cosgrove,et al. Lead Hopping Using SVM and 3D Pharmacophore Fingerprints , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[104] Naomie Salim,et al. Analysis and Display of the Size Dependence of Chemical Similarity Coefficients , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[105] J D Hirst,et al. Nonlinear quantitative structure-activity relationship for the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase by pyrimidines. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[106] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[107] Peter Gedeck,et al. Calculation of Intersubstituent Similarity Using R-Group Descriptors , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[108] J. Topliss,et al. Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. , 1979, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[109] J. Wendoloski,et al. Identification of compounds with nanomolar binding affinity for checkpoint kinase-1 using knowledge-based virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[110] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[111] J. Andrew Grant,et al. Small Molecule Shape-Fingerprints , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[112] Andreas Bender,et al. Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naïve Bayesian Classifier , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[113] D. Frank Hsu,et al. Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[114] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[115] Gergana Dimitrova,et al. A Stepwise Approach for Defining the Applicability Domain of SAR and QSAR Models , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..