The PD-ROBOSCORE: A difficulty score for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
U. Boggi | Jin‐Young Jang | F. Nickel | W. Kwon | D. Lips | M. Besselink | M. Luyer | O. Busch | F. Vistoli | R. D. de Wilde | Baiyong Shen | M. A. Hilal | B. Koerkamp | E. Kauffmann | N. Napoli | C. Cacace | C. Gianfaldoni | Ying-Jui Chao | L. Jones | O. Saint-Marc | M. Cappelle | M. Ginesini | Fabio Asta | Alice Salamone | T. Hackert | Yanmei Shan | Allegra Ripolli | Armando Di Dato | Cesare Gianfaldoni | Michael Ginesini
[1] B. Visser,et al. Establishment and Application of a Novel Difficulty Scoring System for da Vinci Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy , 2022, Frontiers in Surgery.
[2] F. Froghi,et al. Learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a systematic review , 2022, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.
[3] M. Büchler,et al. Learning Curves in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Pancreatic Surgery , 2022, Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches.
[4] U. Boggi,et al. International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM‐HBP surgery project , 2021, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.
[5] M. Sekimoto,et al. Estimation of the degree of surgical difficulty anticipated for pancreatoduodenectomy: Preoperative and intraoperative factors , 2021, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.
[6] N. Syn,et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies. , 2021, Surgery.
[7] U. Boggi,et al. State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy , 2021, Updates in Surgery.
[8] U. Boggi,et al. Precision anatomy for safe approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for both open and minimally invasive procedure: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.
[9] N. Syn,et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review. , 2021, Surgery.
[10] U. Boggi,et al. Risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study. , 2020, The British journal of surgery.
[11] F. Daams,et al. Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3) , 2020, Annals of surgery.
[12] M. Büchler,et al. Not all Whipple procedures are equal: Proposal for a classification of pancreatoduodenectomies. , 2020, Surgery.
[13] U. Boggi,et al. Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portomesenteric Venous Resection. , 2020, Annals of surgery.
[14] H. Zeh,et al. Video review reveals technical factors predictive of biliary stricture and cholangitis after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2020, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.
[15] P. Rancoita,et al. Modelling centralization of pancreatic surgery in a nationwide analysis , 2020, The British journal of surgery.
[16] B. Müller-Stich,et al. Training and learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: from simulation to mastery , 2020 .
[17] A. Moser,et al. Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2020, JAMA surgery.
[18] A. Zureikat,et al. National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery , 2020, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
[19] I. Wee,et al. A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics , 2020, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.
[20] W. Qiu,et al. Short-term Outcomes After Robot-Assisted vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After the Learning Curve , 2020, JAMA surgery.
[21] A. Moser,et al. 500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies , 2019, Annals of surgery.
[22] Jian Wang,et al. Learning Curve From 450 Cases of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduocectomy in a High-Volume Pancreatic Center , 2019, Annals of surgery.
[23] H. Zeh,et al. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis , 2019, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
[24] M. Dijkgraaf,et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. , 2019, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.
[25] U. Boggi,et al. The Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. , 2019, Annals of surgery.
[26] B. Müller-Stich,et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. , 2020, Annals of surgery.
[27] B. Edwin,et al. Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection , 2018, The British journal of surgery.
[28] G. Launoy,et al. Severe postoperative complications decrease overall and disease free survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2018, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[29] T. Pawlik,et al. Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy , 2018, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
[30] Tianjia Ge,et al. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance. , 2018, The Journal of surgical research.
[31] L. Churilov,et al. Health economic implications of complications associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy at a University Hospital: a retrospective cohort cost study. , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.
[32] Souzana Choussein,et al. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons. , 2016, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.
[33] B. Gayet,et al. Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification , 2018, Annals of surgery.
[34] U. Boggi,et al. Proceedings of the first international state-of-the-art conference on minimally-invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.
[35] D. Gouma,et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After , 2017, Surgery.
[36] D. Gouma,et al. Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: A consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery , 2017, Surgery.
[37] Amer H Zureikat,et al. Grading of Surgeon Technical Performance Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Independent of Patient-related Variables , 2016, Annals of surgery.
[38] N. Funel,et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection , 2016, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.
[39] Ji Hun Kim,et al. Totally replaced right hepatic artery in pancreaticoduodenectomy: is this anatomical condition a contraindication to minimally invasive surgery? , 2016, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.
[40] H. Pitt,et al. Relative Contributions of Complications and Failure to Rescue on Mortality in Older Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy , 2016, Annals of surgery.
[41] H. Zeh,et al. An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.
[42] C. Bassi,et al. Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world. , 2015, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.
[43] H. Zeh,et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the presence of aberrant or anomalous hepatic arterial anatomy: safety and oncologic outcomes. , 2015, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.
[44] Amer H Zureikat,et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. , 2015, JAMA surgery.
[45] M. Makary,et al. The Impact of Postoperative Complications on the Administration of Adjuvant Therapy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Adenocarcinoma , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[46] S. Chalikonda,et al. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.
[47] M. Koch,et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. , 2011, Surgery.
[48] S. Pocock,et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[49] D. Gouma,et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). , 2007, Surgery.
[50] Abe Fingerhut,et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. , 2007, Surgery.
[51] Jeffrey E. Lee,et al. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery (DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.013) , 2007 .
[52] N. Demartines,et al. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.
[53] J. Birkmeyer,et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.