Thermoplastic sandwich structure design and manufacturing for the body panel of mass transit vehicle

Abstract Weight savings in vehicles enhances fuel efficiency and decreases maintenance costs, especially in mass transit systems. Lightweight composite materials, such as glass fiber reinforced polymers, have been used to replace traditional steel and aluminum components. In this paper, a mass transit bus side body panel was designed, analyzed, and manufactured using thermoplastic composite materials. The design featured a sandwich composite with E-glass fiber/polypropylene (glass/PP) face sheets and PP honeycomb core as constituents that provide low weight, high strength and energy absorption benefits. The panel was designed and analyzed using Pro/Engineer 2001 (Pro/E), Altair ® Hypermesh ® 6.0 (Hypermesh) and ANSYS 7.0 (ANSYS). A single diaphragm forming process was used to manufacture the glass/PP face sheets. This process provides excellent consolidation, which was confirmed by microstructural analysis of the face sheets. The face sheets and core material were adhesively bonded and tested to validate the model. The failure of the body panel occurred by adhesive failure when the load reached 11.7 kN. The static loading requirements of the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) for the body panel were met. The thermoplastic composite body panel exhibited excellent weight saving of more than 55% compared to a conventional bus with aluminum skin and supporting steel bars.

[1]  Uday K. Vaidya,et al.  Design and Manufacture of Woven Reinforced Glass/Polypropylene Composites for Mass Transit Floor Structure , 2004 .

[2]  W. E. Loven.  STRUCTURAL BONDING OF COMPOSITES IN THE TRANSPORTATION MARKET , 1999 .

[3]  Hwai Chung Wu,et al.  Failure analysis of FRP sandwich bus panels by finite element method , 2003 .

[4]  L. Ye,et al.  Processing of thermoplastic composites from powder/sheath-fibre bundles , 1995 .

[5]  T. Peijs,et al.  Fatigue mechanisms in unidirectional glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene , 1999 .

[6]  T. Lim,et al.  Axisymmetric sheet forming of knitted fabric composite by combined stretch forming and deep drawing , 1999 .

[7]  Dimitrios E. Manolakos,et al.  Crushing of hybrid square sandwich composite vehicle hollow bodyshells with reinforced core subjected to axial loading: numerical simulation , 2003 .

[8]  P. Mallon,et al.  Effect of forming temperature on the properties of polymeric diaphragm formed thermoplastic composites , 1989 .

[9]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  A direct comparison of matched-die versus diaphragm forming , 1998 .

[10]  Trevor Starr.  Good housekeeping brings rewards , 1995 .

[11]  E. L. D'Hooghe,et al.  Thermoplastic Composite Technology; Tougher Than You Think , 2000 .

[12]  Katherine Prince.  Making the most of your mould , 2002 .

[13]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Thermoplastic filament winding with online-impregnation. Part B. Experimental study of processing parameters , 2002 .

[14]  S. Sundaram.  BRIGHT FUTURE FOR GRP INDUSTRY IN INDIA , 1998 .

[15]  Prasad Potluri,et al.  Novel stitch-bonded sandwich composite structures , 2003 .

[16]  J. Koenig,et al.  The characterization of low cost fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by the DRIFT™ process , 2001 .

[17]  Annette M. Harte,et al.  A multilevel approach to the optimisation of a composite light rail vehicle bodyshell , 2004 .

[19]  O. Okoli,et al.  Development of the Double RIFT Diaphragm Forming Process , 2002 .

[20]  Sp.G. Pantelakis,et al.  Optimization of the diaphragm forming process with regard to product quality and cost , 2002 .

[21]  S. Advani,et al.  The consolidation of commingled thermoplastic fabrics , 1991 .

[22]  L. Nicolais,et al.  Effects of processing conditions on the impregnation of glass fibre mat in extrusion/calendering and film stacking operations , 2003 .

[23]  Daniel F. Walczyk,et al.  Using Reconfigurable Tooling and Surface Heating for Incremental Forming of Composite Aircraft Parts , 2003 .