Cognitive Empathy in Design Course for a More Inclusive Mechanical Engineering

Cognitive Empathy, often referred to as perspective taking, refers to the ability to identify and understand details about another’s experience so that one can understand why people may think and feel the way that they do. In recent years the need for designers to develop Cognitive Empathy skills has been recognized and has given rise to human-centered design and empathic design. Many mechanical engineering and design departments offer courses and have programs in these emerging topics. Mechanical engineers need to have basic understanding of Cognitive Empathy to function in today’s workplace. In addition, most mechanical engineering undergraduate programs do not have a diverse student body representative of the general population. Although there are many reasons, we believe that having a welcoming, inclusive environment is a precursor to improving diversity and thus should be an important consideration in mechanical engineering education. We propose that introducing carefully designed training on Cognitive Empathy in design courses could result in (i) a more welcoming and inclusive environment and (ii) a new generation of designers better equipped to consider the users. In this paper we present an “Intercultural Cognitive Empathy” training that was given to all mechanical engineering seniors at the University of Oklahoma to create a more inclusive environment. The students in a senior design course received the training at the beginning of the semester, before forming their design teams, so that they could use the skills to better communicate with each other. Cognitive Empathy research provided the foundation for the training and intercultural active learning components were also integrated. A student survey, done at the end of the semester, showed that students retained and used different components of the training throughout the semester. The assessment strongly suggests that this training should be part of the regular

[1]  Ximena Zúñiga,et al.  Fostering Meaningful Racial Engagement Through Intergroup Dialogues , 2003 .

[2]  Margaret Shih,et al.  Perspective Taking: Reducing Prejudice Towards General Outgroups and Specific Individuals , 2009 .

[3]  Sander Hoogendoorn,et al.  The Impact of Gender Diversity on the Performance of Business Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[4]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Judith N. Martin,et al.  Intercultural Communication in Contexts , 2006 .

[6]  Sylvia Hurtado,et al.  Intergroup dialogue : deliberative democracy in school, college, community, and workplace , 2001 .

[7]  H. B. Sampaio Toward explaining success and failure in interpersonal learning experiences , 1966 .

[8]  W. Heath The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[9]  S. M. García,et al.  2014: , 2020, A Party for Lazarus.

[10]  P. Gurin,et al.  From Separate Corners to Dialogue and Action , 2009 .

[11]  S. B. Lyerly,et al.  Methods for Measuring Adjustment and Social Behavior in the Community: I. Rationale, Description, Discriminative Validity and Scale Development , 1963 .

[12]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[13]  K. A. Finlay,et al.  The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. , 1999 .

[14]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Improving Intergroup Relations: The Effects of Empathy on Racial Attitudes1 , 2000 .

[15]  Shari E. Miller,et al.  Exploring the role of empathy in engineering communication through a transdisciplinary dialogue , 2012 .

[16]  P. Gurin,et al.  Facilitating intergroup dialogues : bridging differences, catalyzing change , 2011 .

[17]  M. L. Khuri * Facilitating Arab‐Jewish intergroup dialogue in the college setting , 2004 .

[18]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Determining Willingness to Engage in Intergroup Contact , 2002 .

[19]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Improving Intergroup Relations , 2001 .

[21]  Sara DeTurk,et al.  The Power of Dialogue: Consequences of Intergroup Dialogue and their Implications for Agency and Alliance Building , 2006 .

[22]  S. Vertovec Super-diversity and its implications , 2007, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[23]  Edgar S. Cahn,et al.  No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative , 2004 .

[24]  SOCIAL COGNITION, EMPATHIC MOTIVATION, AND ADULTS' COMFORTING STRATEGIES , 1983 .

[25]  Merlijn Kouprie,et al.  A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life , 2009 .

[26]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[27]  L. A. Hausman How we Think , 1921 .

[28]  Megan Strickfaden,et al.  Empathic design research: Moving towards a new mode of industrial design education , 2011 .

[29]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Social Inclusion and Exclusion: Recategorization and the Perception of Intergroup Boundaries , 2004 .

[30]  P. Gurin,et al.  Context, identity, and intergroup relations. , 1999 .