Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size

Small and medium-sized firms form 90% of the worldwide population of businesses. However, it has been argued that given their smaller scale of operations, resource access constraints and lower visibility, smaller firms are less likely to participate in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. This article examines the different economic motivations of firms with varying combinations of visibility, resource access and scale of operations. Arguments are presented to propose that in terms of visibility, resource access and operating scale, very small and very large firms are equally motivated to participate in CSR. However, the motivational bases for CSR participation are likely to be different. Medium-sized firms are the least motivated. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between firm size and CSR participation. This study contributes towards resolution of the long-standing debate on the effects of firm size on CSR participation, and highlights the importance of considering configurations of firm characteristics in the study of CSR outcomes. In conclusion, cautions are raised against the broad categorization of firms, without adequate attention to the underlying dimensions of such categorizations.

[1]  Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory , 1988 .

[2]  M. Porter,et al.  The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[3]  D. Payne,et al.  Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2002 .

[4]  H. Jenkins A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective , 2004 .

[5]  B. Husted A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[6]  David Hess,et al.  The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives , 2002 .

[7]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices , 1999 .

[8]  Peter Navarro,et al.  Why Do Corporations Give to Charity , 1988 .

[9]  W. Scaife,et al.  How and why small to medium enterprises (SMEs) engage with their communities : an Australian study , 2006 .

[10]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[11]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[12]  Carol M. Sánchez Motives for Corporate Philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and Political Legitimacy , 2000 .

[13]  J. McGuire,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance , 1988 .

[14]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity , 1988 .

[15]  R. Jeurissen,et al.  Competing Responsibly , 2005, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[16]  Barbara R. Bartkus,et al.  Governance and Corporate Philanthropy , 2002 .

[17]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld,et al.  ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE: A FIELD STUDY IN TWO CONTRASTING INDUSTRIES , 1988 .

[19]  M. Adams,et al.  An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence , 1998 .

[20]  R. Scherer,et al.  Social Responsibility and Market Share , 1993 .

[21]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[22]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[23]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[24]  Sarah J. Freeman,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations , 2000 .

[25]  Reginald Hooghiemstra Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting , 2000 .

[26]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Philanthropy as Strategy , 2003 .

[27]  J. Shepard,et al.  The Proactive Corporation: Its Nature and Causes , 1997 .

[28]  Craig Smith The new corporate philanthropy , 1994 .

[29]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[30]  S. Brammer,et al.  Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis , 2006 .

[31]  François Boutin-Dufresne,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk , 2004 .

[32]  William B. Stevenson,et al.  Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory , 1986 .

[33]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[34]  David H. Saiia Philanthropy and Corporate Citizenship , 2001 .

[35]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms , 1995 .

[36]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[37]  D. Siegel,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and economic performance , 2006 .

[38]  Charles S. Gulas,et al.  Corporate Giving Behavior and Decision-Maker Social Consciousness , 1999 .

[39]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[40]  Marc Orlitzky Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance , 2008 .

[41]  David Hess,et al.  The Legitimacy of Direct Corporate Humanitarian Investment , 2000, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[42]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[43]  G. Lantos The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility , 2001 .

[44]  E. Brenda,et al.  Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values , 2002 .

[45]  Marcellus Jones The Institutional Determinants of Social Responsibility , 1999 .

[46]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[47]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[48]  Stewart Lewis,et al.  Reputation and corporate responsibility , 2003 .

[49]  O. Ferrell,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework , 2004 .