SHM of bridges: characterising thermal response and detecting anomaly events using a temperature-based measurement interpretation approach

A major bottleneck preventing widespread use of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems for bridges is the difficulty in making sense of the collected data. Characterising environmental effects in measured bridge behaviour, and in particular the influence of temperature variations, remains a significant challenge. This paper proposes a novel data-driven approach referred to as Temperature-Based Measurement Interpretation (TB-MI) approach to solve this challenge. The approach is composed of two key steps—(1) characterisation of thermal effects in bridges using a methodology referred to as Regression-Based Thermal Response Prediction (RBTRP) methodology, and (2) detection of anomaly events by analysing differences between measured and predicted structural behaviour. Measurements from a laboratory truss structure that is setup to simulate a range of structural scenarios are employed to evaluate the performance of the TB-MI approach. The study examines how the predictive capability of the RBTRP methodology is influenced by dimensionality reduction and measurement down-sampling, which are common pre-processing techniques used to deal with high spatial and temporal density in measurements. It also proposes a novel anomaly detection technique referred to as signal subtraction method that detects anomaly events from time-series of prediction errors, which are computed as the difference between in situ measurements and predictions obtained using the RBTRP methodology. Results demonstrate that the TB-MI approach has potential for integration within data interpretation frameworks of SHM systems of full-scale bridges.

[1]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Methodologies for model-free data interpretation of civil engineering structures , 2010 .

[2]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Noise and Outlier Removal from Jet Engine Health Signals Using Weighted FIR Median Hybrid Filters , 2002 .

[3]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Structural health monitoring and damage assessment using a novel time series analysis methodology with sensor clustering , 2011 .

[4]  Rolands Kromanis,et al.  Structural performance evaluation of bridges : characterizing and integrating thermal response , 2015 .

[5]  William L. Gamble,et al.  Nonlinear Temperature Distributions in Bridges at Different Locations in the United States , 1989 .

[6]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Model-free data interpretation for continuous monitoring of complex structures , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[7]  Pennung Warnitchai,et al.  Structural health monitoring of continuous prestressed concrete bridges using ambient thermal responses , 2012 .

[8]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Estimation: Long Span Truss Bridge Application With Environmental Monitoring Data , 2008 .

[9]  You-Lin Xu,et al.  Temperature effect on vibration properties of civil structures: a literature review and case studies , 2012 .

[10]  Sharon L. Wood,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE LONG-TERM PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE , 1992 .

[11]  Prakash Kripakaran,et al.  Support vector regression for anomaly detection from measurement histories , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[13]  Alessandro De Stefano,et al.  Vibration-based monitoring of civil infrastructure: challenges and successes , 2011 .

[14]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Evaluating two model-free data interpretation methods for measurements that are influenced by temperature , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Jack H. Emanuel,et al.  Length-Thermal Stress Relations for Composite Bridges , 1985 .

[16]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  THERMAL ACTIONS FOR CONCRETE BRIDGE DESIGN , 1993 .

[17]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Statistical Damage Classification Under Changing Environmental and Operational Conditions , 2002 .

[18]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Combined Model-Free Data-Interpretation Methodologies for Damage Detection during Continuous Monitoring of Structures , 2013, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[19]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Multimodel Structural Performance Monitoring , 2010 .

[20]  Keith Worden,et al.  Switching Response Surface Models for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges , 2013 .

[21]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[22]  P. Pillay,et al.  Self-Powered Sensors for Monitoring of Highway Bridges , 2009, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[23]  Elizabeth Cross,et al.  Linear approaches to modeling nonlinearities in long-term monitoring of bridges , 2013 .

[24]  Prakash Kripakaran,et al.  Predicting thermal response of bridges using regression models derived from measurement histories , 2014 .

[25]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Conceptual damage-sensitive features for structural health monitoring: Laboratory and field demonstrations , 2008 .

[26]  Andrea Del Grosso,et al.  A long-term static monitoring experiment on R.C. beams: damage identification under environmental effect , 2014 .

[27]  Keith Worden,et al.  Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.