Learning a blind image quality index based on visual saliency guided sampling and Gabor filtering

The goal of no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) is to estimate the quality of an image consistent with the human perception of the image automatically without any prior of the reference image. In this paper, we present a simple yet efficient and effective approach to learn a blind Image Quality index based on Visual saliency guided sampling and Gabor filtering, namely IQVG. Given an image, we at first randomly sample a sufficient number of image patches guided by the image's visual saliency map and convolve each patch with Gabor filters to get a bag of features. Then, the image is represented by using a histogram to encode the bag of features. Support vector regression (SVR) is used to learn the mapping from feature space to image quality. Extensive experiments conducted on the LIVE IQA database demonstrate the overall superiority of our IQVG over the other state-of-the-art NR-IQA algorithms evaluated. The Matlab source code of IQVG and the evaluation results are available online at http://sse.tongji.edu.cn/linzhang/IQA/IQVG/IQVG.htm.

[1]  Xiaojun Wu,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment Using a General Regression Neural Network , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[2]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment based on visual codebook , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Liqing Zhang,et al.  Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Yuukou Horita,et al.  No reference image quality assessment for JPEG2000 based on spatial features , 2008, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[6]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Xiang Zhu,et al.  A no-reference sharpness metric sensitive to blur and noise , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Ali Borji,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Hongyu Li,et al.  SR-SIM: A fast and high performance IQA index based on spectral residual , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  Jan P. Allebach,et al.  Measurement of ringing artifacts in JPEG images , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Two-Step Framework for Constructing Blind Image Quality Indices , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[15]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Computational versus Psychophysical Bottom-Up Image Saliency: A Comparative Evaluation Study , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality , 2011, CVPR 2011.