The Logical Basis for the use of Continuous Characters in Phylogenetic Systematics

It has been argued that continuous characteristics should be excluded from cladistic analysis for two reasons: because the data are considered inappropriate; and because the methods for the conversion of these data into codes are considered arbitrary. Metric data, however, fulfill the sole criterion for inclusion in phylogenetic analysis, the presence of homologous character states, and thus cannot be excluded as a class of data. The second line of reasoning, that coding methods are arbitrary, applies to gap and segment coding, but quantitative data can be coded in a nonarbitrary manner by means of tests of statistical significance. These procedures, which are both objective and repeatable, determine the probability that two taxa possess an homologous character state; that is, if they have inherited a particular central tendency and distribution of individual variates unchanged from a common ancestor. Thus, the application of statistical tests to quantitative data empirically detects the presence of evolu tionary change, the raw material of phylogenetic reconstruction.

[1]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony , 1984 .

[2]  C. Humphries,et al.  CLADISTICS AND COMPUTERS: A CHIRONOMID CONUNDRUM? , 1988 .

[3]  D. Dennett Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1995 .

[4]  K. Thiele THE HOLY GRAIL OF THE PERFECT CHARACTER: THE CLADISTIC TREATMENT OF MORPHOMETRIC DATA , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[5]  MORPHOMETRICS, PHYLOGENETIC MODELS AND CLADISTICS: MEANS TO AN END OR MUCH TO DO ABOUT NOTHING? , 1994 .

[6]  C. Simon A New Coding Procedure for Morphometric Data with an Example from Periodical Cicada Wing Veins , 1983 .

[7]  Finite Mixture Coding: A New Approach to Coding Continuous Characters , 1996 .

[8]  J. Huelsenbeck,et al.  SUCCESS OF PHYLOGENETIC METHODS IN THE FOUR-TAXON CASE , 1993 .

[9]  James W. Archie,et al.  A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data , 1989 .

[10]  M. F. Mickevich,et al.  Congruence Between Morphological and Allozyme Data in Evolutionary Inference and Character Evolution , 1976 .

[11]  J. Chappill QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[12]  E. Trinkaus Cladistics and the hominid fossil record. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  K. Gallagher Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1996 .

[14]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1970 .

[15]  Leonard A. Freed,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Extinctions in Populations of a Hawaiian Honeycreeper , 1995 .

[16]  J. Farris PHENETICS IN CAMOUFLAGE , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[17]  Richard A. Pimentcl,et al.  THE NATURE OF CLADISTIC DATA , 1987, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[18]  P. Stevens Character States, Morphological Variation, and Phylogenetic Analysis: A Review , 1991 .

[19]  R. Thorne,et al.  Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification , 1964, Nature.

[20]  M. Donoghue,et al.  The Suitability of Molecular and Morphological Evidence in Reconstructing Plant Phylogeny , 1992 .

[21]  J. Bull,et al.  Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny. , 1992, Science.

[22]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[23]  J. Farris,et al.  The implications of congruence in Menidia , 1981 .

[24]  Peter H. Raven,et al.  Advances in legume systematics , 1981 .

[25]  Douglas E. Soltis,et al.  Molecular Systematics of Plants , 1992, Springer US.

[26]  A. Friday,et al.  Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction , 1984 .

[27]  James S. Farris,et al.  The retention index and homoplasy excess , 1989 .

[28]  T. Disotell Generic level relationships of the Papionini (Cercopithecoidea). , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  James W. Archie,et al.  METHODS FOR CODING VARIABLE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES FOR NUMERICAL TAXONOMIC ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[30]  B. Baum A simple procedure for establishing discrete characters from measurement data, applicable to cladistics , 1988 .

[31]  C. Bult,et al.  ForumTesting Significance of Incongruence , 1994 .

[32]  Donald H. Colless,et al.  Congruence Between Morphometric and Allozyme Data for Menidia Species: A Reappraisal , 1980 .

[33]  C. Bult,et al.  TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .