The Logical Basis for the use of Continuous Characters in Phylogenetic Systematics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Wayne P. Maddison,et al. Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony , 1984 .
[2] C. Humphries,et al. CLADISTICS AND COMPUTERS: A CHIRONOMID CONUNDRUM? , 1988 .
[3] D. Dennett. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1995 .
[4] K. Thiele. THE HOLY GRAIL OF THE PERFECT CHARACTER: THE CLADISTIC TREATMENT OF MORPHOMETRIC DATA , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[5] MORPHOMETRICS, PHYLOGENETIC MODELS AND CLADISTICS: MEANS TO AN END OR MUCH TO DO ABOUT NOTHING? , 1994 .
[6] C. Simon. A New Coding Procedure for Morphometric Data with an Example from Periodical Cicada Wing Veins , 1983 .
[7] Finite Mixture Coding: A New Approach to Coding Continuous Characters , 1996 .
[8] J. Huelsenbeck,et al. SUCCESS OF PHYLOGENETIC METHODS IN THE FOUR-TAXON CASE , 1993 .
[9] James W. Archie,et al. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data , 1989 .
[10] M. F. Mickevich,et al. Congruence Between Morphological and Allozyme Data in Evolutionary Inference and Character Evolution , 1976 .
[11] J. Chappill. QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS , 1989 .
[12] E. Trinkaus. Cladistics and the hominid fossil record. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.
[13] K. Gallagher. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1996 .
[14] Arnold G. Kluge,et al. A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1970 .
[15] Leonard A. Freed,et al. Evolutionary Consequences of Extinctions in Populations of a Hawaiian Honeycreeper , 1995 .
[16] J. Farris. PHENETICS IN CAMOUFLAGE , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[17] Richard A. Pimentcl,et al. THE NATURE OF CLADISTIC DATA , 1987, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[18] P. Stevens. Character States, Morphological Variation, and Phylogenetic Analysis: A Review , 1991 .
[19] R. Thorne,et al. Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification , 1964, Nature.
[20] M. Donoghue,et al. The Suitability of Molecular and Morphological Evidence in Reconstructing Plant Phylogeny , 1992 .
[21] J. Bull,et al. Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny. , 1992, Science.
[22] J. Felsenstein. Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .
[23] J. Farris,et al. The implications of congruence in Menidia , 1981 .
[24] Peter H. Raven,et al. Advances in legume systematics , 1981 .
[25] Douglas E. Soltis,et al. Molecular Systematics of Plants , 1992, Springer US.
[26] A. Friday,et al. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction , 1984 .
[27] James S. Farris,et al. The retention index and homoplasy excess , 1989 .
[28] T. Disotell. Generic level relationships of the Papionini (Cercopithecoidea). , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.
[29] James W. Archie,et al. METHODS FOR CODING VARIABLE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES FOR NUMERICAL TAXONOMIC ANALYSIS , 1985 .
[30] B. Baum. A simple procedure for establishing discrete characters from measurement data, applicable to cladistics , 1988 .
[31] C. Bult,et al. ForumTesting Significance of Incongruence , 1994 .
[32] Donald H. Colless,et al. Congruence Between Morphometric and Allozyme Data for Menidia Species: A Reappraisal , 1980 .
[33] C. Bult,et al. TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .