A comparison of Neutral Atom Detector Unit neutral atom image inversion with a comprehensive ring current model

We present energetic neutral atom (ENA) images in the energy range 45 to 50 keV for H and 92 to 138 keV for O measured by the Neutral Atom Detector Unit (NUADU) onboard Double Star TC-2 during a geomagnetic storm on 8 May 2005. We compare the ion fluxes deduced from inversion of the NUADU image with those calculated using the Comprehensive Ring Current Model (CRCM). This comparison shows that the two approaches are consistent when used to derive the configuration of the corresponding global ion distribution and the peak ion fluxes. The deduced peak ion flux is located in the premidnight sector at 1540 UT, while the deduced ion peak flux is located in the midnight sector at 1610 UT. There are strong ion fluxes in the region between L = 2 and L = 4 which form a closed loop configuration. The ion peak flux is about 2.2 x 10(6)/cm(2)/sr/keV/s. The deduced ion distribution agrees well with the NUADU measurement. The agreement between the inverted ion distributions and the CRCM results give us confidence in applying our ENA imaging and modeling techniques to the study of the evolution of the inner magnetosphere plasma distribution and the global dynamics of the ring current during magnetic storms.

[1]  R. Spiro,et al.  Comprehensive computational model of Earth's ring current , 2001 .

[2]  D. Weimer,et al.  Models of high‐latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients , 1995 .

[3]  E. Roelof.  Energetic neutral atom image of a storm-time ring current , 1987 .

[4]  R. Wolf,et al.  Global ena Image Simulations , 2003 .

[5]  S. Barabash,et al.  The energetic NeUtral Atom Detector Unit (NUADU) for China's Double Star Mission and its calibration , 2004 .

[6]  T. Moore,et al.  Deconvolution of Energetic Neutral Atom Images of the Earth's Magnetosphere , 2000 .

[7]  P. Brandt,et al.  Retrieval of global magnetospheric ion distributions from high-energy neutral atom measurements made by the IMAGE/HENA instrument , 2004 .

[8]  M. Fok,et al.  Postmidnight storm‐time enhancement of tens‐of‐keV proton flux , 2004 .

[9]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  Modeling the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field confined within a realistic magnetopause , 1995 .

[10]  A. Skinner,et al.  Extraction of ion distributions from magnetospheric ENA and EUV images , 2000 .

[11]  T. Moore,et al.  Modeling of inner plasma sheet and ring current during substorms , 1999 .

[12]  T. Moore,et al.  Ring current modeling in a realistic magnetic field configuration , 1997 .

[13]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Initial ion equatorial pitch angle distributions from medium and high energy neutral atom images obtained by IMAGE , 2001 .

[14]  R. Elphic,et al.  The driving of the plasma sheet by the solar wind , 1998 .

[15]  David P. Stern,et al.  Modeling the global magnetic field of the large‐scale Birkeland current systems , 1996 .

[16]  Y. Ebihara,et al.  Simulation study on fundamental properties of the storm‐time ring current , 2000 .

[17]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Quantitative simulation of a magnetospheric substorm 1. Model logic and overview , 1981 .

[18]  P. Brandt,et al.  IMAGE/high-energy energetic neutral atom: Global energetic neutral atom imaging of the plasma sheet and ring current during substorms , 2002 .