Distinct mechanisms for talker adaptation operate in parallel on different timescales

[1]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry , 2021, Brain and Language.

[2]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability , 2021, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[3]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability , 2021, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Sahil Luthra.  The Role of the Right Hemisphere in Processing Phonetic Variability Between Talkers , 2020, Neurobiology of Language.

[5]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency , 2020, Cognition.

[6]  Rachel M. Theodore,et al.  Talker normalization is mediated by structured indexical information , 2020, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[7]  Rachel M. Theodore,et al.  Talker normalization is mediated by structured indexical information , 2020, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Common cortical architectures for phonological working memory identified in individual brains , 2019, NeuroImage.

[9]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech , 2019, Cognition.

[10]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left temporal lobe disrupts rapid talker adaptation in speech processing , 2019, Brain and Language.

[11]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[12]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  TALKER CONTINUITY FACILITATES SPEECH PROCESSING INDEPENDENT OF LISTENERS’ EXPECTATIONS , 2019 .

[13]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  ATTENTIONAL REORIENTATION EXPLAINS PROCESSING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH TALKER VARIABILITY , 2019 .

[14]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Influence of talker discontinuity on cortical dynamics of auditory spatial attention , 2018, NeuroImage.

[15]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[16]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Phonological Working Memory for Words and Nonwords in Cerebral Cortex. , 2017, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail , 2017, Brain and Language.

[18]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Dysfunction of Rapid Neural Adaptation in Dyslexia , 2016, Neuron.

[19]  Howard C. Nusbaum,et al.  Understanding Speech in the Context of Variability , 2016 .

[20]  P. Wong,et al.  Poor phonetic perceivers are affected by cognitive load when resolving talker variability. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Steven M. Lulich,et al.  The effect of exposure to a single vowel on talker normalization for vowels. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Speech perception as an active cognitive process , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[23]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  Bottom-up influences of voice continuity in focusing selective auditory attention , 2014, Psychological research.

[24]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Language repetition and short-term memory: an integrative framework , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[26]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[27]  A. Lotto,et al.  Tuned with a Tune: Talker Normalization via General Auditory Processes , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[28]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  The Effect , 2012 .

[29]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  Areas of left perisylvian cortex mediate auditory–verbal short-term memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Bharath Chandrasekaran,et al.  Neural Processing of What and Who Information in Speech , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  H. Nusbaum.  Talker Normalization: Phonetic Constancy as a Cognitive Process , 2011 .

[33]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  M. Seghier,et al.  The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  Virginia Best,et al.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  B. Shinn-Cunningham.  Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[38]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Neural Bases of Talker Normalization , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Adaptation to speaker's voice in right anterior temporal lobe , 2003, Neuroreport.

[43]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[45]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis , 2001 .

[46]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[47]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[48]  P K Kuhl,et al.  The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones , 1989, Speech Commun..

[53]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Harvey M. Sussman,et al.  A neuronal model of vowel normalization and representation , 1986, Brain and Language.

[55]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  CHAPTER 4 – The Role of Attention and Active Processing in Speech Perception* , 1986 .

[56]  R. Weale.  Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[57]  J. T. Hogan,et al.  Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Toward the Specification of Speech , 1950 .