Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions:a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment.

Many natural predator-prey systems oscillate but persist with densities staying well away from zero. Non-spatial predator-prey models predict that in environments where prey on itself can do well, a predator-prey system can oscillate with troughs in which the populations become vanishingly small. This phenomenon has become known as the paradox of enrichment. In this paper the role of space in bounding overall population oscillations is analysed in the simplest version of spatial predator-prey models: a two-patch model for a Lotka-Volterra system and a Rosenzweig-MacArthur system with logistic prey growth and Holling type II functional response of predator to prey density within each patch. It was found that the spatial interactions can bound the fluctuations of the predator-prey system and regulate predator and prey populations, even in the absence of density dependent processes. The spatial dynamics take the form of locally asynchronous fluctuations. Enrichment of the environment in a two-patch model does not necessarily have the paradoxical consequence that the populations reach densities where extinction is likely to occur.

[1]  William Gurney,et al.  Two-patch metapopulation dynamics , 1993 .

[2]  C. Huffaker,et al.  Experimental studies on predation: Complex dispersion and levels of food in an acarine predator-prey interaction , 1963 .

[3]  E. J. Maly.  A Laboratory Study of the Interaction Between the Predatory Rotifer Asplanchna and Paramecium , 1969 .

[4]  G. Nachman.  An acarine predator‐prey metapopulation system inhabiting greenhouse cucumbers , 1991 .

[5]  Y. Kuznetsov,et al.  Continuation techniques and interactive software for bifurcation analysis of ODEs and iterated maps: physics , 1993 .

[6]  A. Nicholson,et al.  The Balance of Animal Populations.—Part I. , 1935 .

[7]  P. J. Boer,et al.  Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers , 1968 .

[8]  C. Huffaker.  Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[9]  P J den Boer,et al.  Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. , 1968, Acta biotheoretica.

[10]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  H. Comins,et al.  Prey-predator models in spatially heterogeneous environments. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  P. J. Hughesdon,et al.  The Struggle for Existence , 1927, Nature.

[13]  Robert M. May,et al.  The spatial dynamics of host-parasitoid systems , 1992 .

[14]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics , 1991, Nature.

[15]  William G. Wilson,et al.  Mobility versus density-limited predator-prey dynamics on different spatial scales , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  M. Rosenzweig.  Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[17]  W. Wilson,et al.  Spatial Instabilities within the Diffusive Lotka-Volterra System: Individual-Based Simulation Results , 1993 .

[18]  F. Adler.  Migration Alone Can Produce Persistence of Host-Parasitoid Models , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[19]  J. Steele,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity and Population Stability , 1974, Nature.