Value of diagnostic tests to predict conversion to Alzheimer's disease in young and old patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Using the database of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we examined the value of neuropsychological assessment, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and FDG-PET scanning with respect to prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). We tested the hypothesis that CSF biomarkers and FDG-PET would lose prognostic value when applied in patients older than 75 years, whereas MRI and neuropsychological testing would not. At baseline 175 patients had MCI, mostly amnestic. They were followed during a mean of 2.7 years, and 81 patients converted to AD after a mean of 1.6 years. Logistic regression analyses showed that neuropsychological assessment and MRI variables predicted conversion with 63 to 67% classification success both in patients younger and older than 75 years, while CSF biomarkers attained this success rate only in patients younger than 75 years. For FDG-PET, this rate was 57% in the total sample. We conclude that the diagnostic yield of different techniques in predicting conversion from MCI to AD is moderate, and that it is affected by age of the subject under study. MRI and neuropsychological assessment remain informative in patients older than 75 years, unlike CSF biomarkers.

[1]  T. Iwatsubo [Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)]. , 2011, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  T. Goldberg,et al.  Utility of combinations of biomarkers, cognitive markers, and risk factors to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease in patients in the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. , 2011, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  B. Schmand,et al.  Value of Neuropsychological Tests, Neuroimaging, and Biomarkers for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease in Younger and Older Age Cohorts , 2011, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  Cindee M. Madison,et al.  Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[5]  J. Morris,et al.  The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[6]  Richard J. Kryscio,et al.  Alzheimer’s disease is not “brain aging”: neuropathological, genetic, and epidemiological human studies , 2011, Acta Neuropathologica.

[7]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Diagnosis-independent Alzheimer disease biomarker signature in cognitively normal elderly people. , 2010, Archives of neurology.

[9]  Mark E. Schmidt,et al.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Progress report and future plans , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[10]  C. Jack,et al.  Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[11]  W. Jagust,et al.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative positron emission tomography core , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[12]  A. Dale,et al.  Combining MR Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, and CSF Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer Disease , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  C. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) , 2010, Neurology.

[14]  Carol Brayne,et al.  Age, neuropathology, and dementia. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Wiesje M. van der Flier,et al.  CSF biomarker levels in early and late onset Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  H M Huizenga,et al.  Meta-analysis of CSF and MRI biomarkers for detecting preclinical Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Psychological Medicine.

[17]  Magda Tsolaki,et al.  Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  R. Petersen,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[19]  Richard L. Doty,et al.  Combining Early Markers Strongly Predicts Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  David A. Bennett,et al.  Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons , 2007, Neurology.

[21]  Lars Bäckman,et al.  Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[22]  W. A. Gool,et al.  The age gap between patients in clinical studies and in the general population: a pitfall for dementia research , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  D. Bennett,et al.  Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[24]  J. Morris,et al.  Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[25]  K. Zakzanis Quantitative evidence for neuroanatomic and neuropsychological markers in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[26]  Charles D. Smith,et al.  Prediction of preclinical Alzheimer's disease: longitudinal rates of change in cognition. , 2011, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[27]  Sean D Sullivan,et al.  Review and meta-analysis of biomarkers and diagnostic imaging in Alzheimer's disease. , 2011, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[28]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .