Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines.

PURPOSE This study aims to determine magnitude, causes and consequences of post-operative breast tumour target volume delineation variation among radiation oncologists in the presence of guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS Excision cavities, CTVs and PTVs of eight breast cancer patients were delineated on CT scans by 13 Dutch radiation oncologists (observers) from 12 Dutch institutes participating in the international Young Boost Trial. Delineated volumes and conformity indices were determined. CTV delineation variation (SD) was determined for anatomically relevant regions. Non-parametric statistics were performed to establish effects of observers, patient characteristics and regions on delineation variation. RESULTS Even in the presence of delineation guidelines considerable delineation variation is present (0.24<SD<1.22 cm). Presence of clips or seroma reduced interobserver variation (0.24<SD<0.62 cm). Region-specific analysis showed distinct regions of higher variability per patient. This could not always be ascribed to anatomical features, suggesting interobserver variation is not solely due to lack of image quality. CONCLUSIONS In this study, interobserver delineation variation in breast tumour target volume delineation is larger than, e.g. setup inaccuracies and results from limited reliable visual guidance as well as interpretation differences between observers, despite guidelines. Reduction of delineation variation is essential in view of current developments in planning techniques, particularly for External Partial Breast Irradiation.

[1]  A. Nichol,et al.  Consistency in seroma contouring for partial breast radiotherapy: impact of guidelines. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J. Bellon,et al.  Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Angelique T. E. F. Schlief,et al.  Using histopathology breast cancer data to reduce clinical target volume margins at radiotherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  G. Németh,et al.  Breast-conserving treatment with partial or whole breast irradiation for low-risk invasive breast carcinoma--5-year results of a randomized trial. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Bernard Dubray,et al.  Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: different delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by radiologists and radiation oncologists. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Laurence Collette,et al.  Impact of a Higher Radiation Dose on Local Control and Survival in Breast-Conserving Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results of the Randomized Boost Versus No Boost EORTC 22881-10882 Trial , 2007 .

[7]  C. Raaijmakers,et al.  Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  J. Langendijk,et al.  Three-dimensional conformal simultaneously integrated boost technique for breast-conserving radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  C. Hurkmans,et al.  High-dose simultaneously integrated breast boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and inverse optimization. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  D. S. Lind,et al.  Breast‐conserving therapy (BCT) for early‐stage breast cancer , 2004, Journal of surgical oncology.

[11]  Marjan Admiraal,et al.  Significance of breast boost volume changes during radiotherapy in relation to current clinical interobserver variations. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  D. Yan,et al.  The validity of surgical clips as a radiographic surrogate for the lumpectomy cavity in image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  C. Hurkmans,et al.  Clinical factors associated with seroma volume reduction in breast-Conserving Therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  A. Budrukkar,et al.  Techniques of tumour bed boost irradiation in breast conserving therapy: Current evidence and suggested guidelines , 2007, Acta oncologica.

[15]  Eric Berthelet,et al.  Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a 'Big Brother' evaluation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  W. Woodward,et al.  Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  F. Vicini,et al.  Interim cosmetic results and toxicity using 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  F. Vicini,et al.  Partial breast irradiation. Patient selection, guidelines for treatment, and current results. , 2007, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[20]  F. Vicini,et al.  Partial Breast Irradiation , 2007 .

[21]  E. van Limbergen,et al.  Impact of the boost dose of 10 Gy versus 26 Gy in patients with early stage breast cancer after a microscopically incomplete lumpectomy: 10-year results of the randomised EORTC boost trial. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  R Dendale,et al.  Anatomical, clinical and radiological delineation of target volumes in breast cancer radiotherapy planning: individual variability, questions and answers. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  S. Jolly,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Vincent Servois,et al.  How to boost the breast tumor bed? A multidisciplinary approach in eight steps. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast carcinoma: a systematic review. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  Michael Bremer,et al.  The delineation of target volumes for radiotherapy of lung cancer patients. , 2009, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[27]  B J Mijnheer,et al.  Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.