Light green doesnt mean hydrology!: toward a visualrhetorical framework for interface design

Abstract The utility of metaphor as a visual–rhetorical design framework has diminished dramatically, and continues to erode. Metaphor has two important limitations as it is commonly applied in interface design: (a) metaphors are indexical, pointing to physical artifacts that they represent, and (b) metaphors are static, that is, unwavering in their indexicality. Both assumptions are demonstrably flawed. In this article, I first critically examine metaphor’s limitations as a visual–rhetorical framework for designing, evaluating, and critiquing user interfaces. Next, I outline an alternate framework for visual rhetoric, that of genre ecologies, and discuss how it avoids some of the limitations of metaphor. Finally, I use an empirical study of computer users to illustrate the genre-ecology framework and contrast it with metaphor.

[1]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones. , 1994 .

[2]  Albert P. Melone.  Serendipity and International Experience in Political Science: The Bulgaria/Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Connection , 1994 .

[3]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[4]  Caryl Emerson,et al.  Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics , 1985 .

[5]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Borderline Issues: Social and Material Aspects of Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays , 1981 .

[7]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  Navigating the Current of Economic Policy: Written Genres and the Distribution of Cognitive Work at a Financial Institution , 1997 .

[8]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[9]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics , 1985 .

[10]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Computers in Mediated Human Activity , 1997 .

[11]  C. Bazerman.  Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science , 1989 .

[12]  C. Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/culture/power , 1994 .

[13]  Eric Harslem,et al.  Designing the STAR User Interface , 1987, ECICS.

[14]  Mark Zachry.  Constructing Usable Documentation: A Study of Communicative Practices and the Early Uses of Mainframe Computing in Industry , 2001 .

[15]  Clay Spinuzzi.  Grappling with Distributed Usability: A Cultural-Historical Examination of Documentation Genres over Four Decades , 2001 .

[16]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[17]  Clay Ian Spinuzzi,et al.  Designing for lifeworlds: genre and activity in information systems design and evaluation , 1999 .

[18]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[19]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  Working with interface metaphors , 1995 .

[20]  D. Russell.  Rethinking Genre in School and Society , 1997 .

[21]  Christina Haas,et al.  On the relationship between old and new technologies , 1999 .

[22]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .