Treatment Effects With Heterogeneous Externalities

Abstract This article proposes a new method for estimating heterogeneous externalities in policy analysis when social interactions take the linear-in-means form. We establish that the parameters of interest can be identified and consistently estimated using specific functions of the share of the eligible population. We also study the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators using Monte Carlo simulations. The method is illustrated using data on the PROGRESA program. We find that more than 50% of the effects of the program on schooling attendance are due to externalities, which are heterogeneous within and between poor and nonpoor households.

[1]  Leigh L. Linden,et al.  Improving the Design of Conditional Transfer Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Education Experiment in Colombia † , 2011 .

[2]  H. Kelejian,et al.  A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances , 1998 .

[3]  Harry H. Kelejian,et al.  A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model , 1999 .

[4]  Soohyung Lee,et al.  MULTIPLE TESTING AND HETEROGENEOUS TREATMENT EFFECTS: RE-EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF PROGRESA ON SCHOOL ENROLLMENT: HETEROGENEOUS TREATMENT EFFECTS , 2014 .

[5]  Alfonso Flores-Lagunes,et al.  Partial Identification of Local Average Treatment Effects With an Invalid Instrument , 2013 .

[6]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  On causal inference in the presence of interference , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  M. LeBlanc,et al.  Boosting predictions of treatment success , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Moffitt.  Policy Interventions, Low-Level Equilibria, and So-cial Interactions , 1999 .

[9]  M. Hudgens,et al.  Toward Causal Inference With Interference , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[10]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Human Capital Formation and General Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tax and Tuition Policy , 2005 .

[11]  Aviv Nevo,et al.  Identification With Imperfect Instruments , 2008, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[12]  C. Manski.  Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects , 1989 .

[13]  Kaivan Munshi.  Networks in the Modern Economy: Mexican Migrants in the U. S. Labor Market , 2003 .

[14]  Alfonso Flores-Lagunes,et al.  Finite sample evidence of IV estimators under weak instruments , 2007 .

[15]  Chih-Sheng Hsieh,et al.  Gender and racial peer effects with endogenous network formation , 2017 .

[16]  Soohyung Lee,et al.  Multiple Testing and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Re-Evaluating the Effect of PROGRESA on School Enrollment , 2013 .

[17]  J. Aislinn Bohren,et al.  Optimal Design of Experiments in the Presence of Interference , 2017, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  M. Grosh,et al.  Understanding the poverty impact of the global financial crisis in Latin America and the Caribbean , 2014 .

[19]  Marc Ratkovic,et al.  Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation , 2013, 1305.5682.

[20]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects , 2007 .

[21]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  John L. Hartman,et al.  Networks and Workouts: Treatment Size and Status Specific Peer Effects in a Randomized Field Experiment , 2010 .

[23]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Heterogeneous Impacts in PROGRESA , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  J. Kmenta.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2010 .

[25]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Peer Effects and Social Networks in Education , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Rafael Lalive,et al.  Social Interactions and Schooling Decisions , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[27]  E. Duflo,et al.  The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment , 2002 .

[28]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[29]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  GMM estimation of social interaction models with centrality , 2010 .

[30]  A. Belloni,et al.  Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data , 2013, 1311.2645.

[31]  Arun G. Chandrasekhar,et al.  The Diffusion of Microfinance , 2012, Science.

[32]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate? , 2006 .

[33]  Zhuang Fengqing,et al.  Patients’ Responsibilities in Medical Ethics , 2016 .

[34]  Michael G. Hudgens,et al.  Large Sample Randomization Inference of Causal Effects in the Presence of Interference , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[35]  C. Manski,et al.  Monotone Instrumental Variables with an Application to the Returns to Schooling , 1998 .

[36]  R. Vakis,et al.  Cash Transfers, Behavioral Changes, and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment , 2008 .

[37]  Rokhaya Dieye,et al.  Accounting for Peer Effects in Treatment Response , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  J. Gignoux,et al.  Policy Evaluation in the Presence of Spatial Externalities: Reassessing the Progresa Program , 2014 .

[39]  F. Windmeijer,et al.  A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables☆ , 2016, Journal of econometrics.

[40]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Neighborhood Peer Effects in Secondary School Enrollment Decisions , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[41]  O. Bandiera,et al.  Labor Markets and Poverty in Village Economies , 2016 .

[42]  M. Villeval,et al.  Gender and Peer Effects in Social Networks , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[43]  M. Angelucci,et al.  Indirect Effects of an Aid Program: How Do Cash Transfers Affect Ineligibles' Consumption? , 2009 .

[44]  Frank Windmeijer,et al.  A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables☆ , 2013, Journal of Econometrics.

[45]  H. Chipman,et al.  BART: Bayesian Additive Regression Trees , 2008, 0806.3286.

[46]  Costas Meghir,et al.  Identification of Treatment Effects Using Control Functions in Models with Continuous, Endogenous Treatment and Heterogeneous Effects , 2008 .

[47]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Do Peers Affect Student Achievement? Evidence from Canada Using Group Size Variation , 2010 .

[48]  M. Hudgens,et al.  Randomization inference for treatment effects on a binary outcome , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[49]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Identification and Efficient Estimation of Simultaneous Equations Network Models , 2014 .

[50]  D. Rubin.  Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers , 1986 .

[51]  Karen Macours,et al.  Changing Households' Investment Behaviour Through Social Interactions with Local Leaders: Evidence from a Randomised Transfer Programme , 2014 .

[52]  E. Oster,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: PEER EFFECTS IN MENSTRUAL CUP TAKE-UP , 2012 .

[53]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  Best Spatial Two‐Stage Least Squares Estimators for a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances , 2003 .

[54]  Edoardo M. Airoldi,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Treatment and Interference Effects in Observational Studies on Networks , 2016, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[55]  Jane Cooley Fruehwirth.  Identifying peer achievement spillovers: Implications for desegregation and the achievement gap , 2013 .

[56]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Identification of Treatment Response with Social Interactions , 2013 .

[57]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Markov chains indexed by trees , 1994 .

[58]  Lori Beaman,et al.  Social Networks and the Dynamics of Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from Refugees Resettled in the U.S , 2012 .

[59]  Edward Miguel,et al.  Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities, Guide to Replication of Miguel and Kremer (2004) , 2014 .

[60]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Progressing through PROGRESA: An Impact Assessment of a School Subsidy Experiment in Rural Mexico , 2005, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[61]  J. Heckman,et al.  Making the Most out of Programme Evaluations and Social Experiments: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Programme Impacts , 1997 .

[62]  Katharine R. E. Sims,et al.  The Ecological Footprint of Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from Mexico's Oportunidades Program , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[63]  B. Davis,et al.  Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households into PROGRESA , 2001 .

[64]  Timothy G. Conley,et al.  Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana , 2010 .

[65]  Eleonora Patacchini,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Outcome Response with Heterogeneous Treatment Externalities , 2014 .