Multi-objective operation optimization and evaluation of large-scale NG distributed energy system driven by gas-steam combined cycle in China

Abstract Many pilot projects of large-scale distributed energy resources (DER) system have been constructed recent years in China and operation strategies make a great impact on their benefits and further development. This paper presents a multi-objective (joint) optimization model for the large-scale DER system of Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center to obtain the optimal operation strategies under different daily periods: peak periods, flat periods, and valley periods. The prime mover used in this investigation is a gas-steam combined cycle based on combined gas turbines and steam turbines, and the DER system is evaluated under three different operation optimization modes: joint optimization mode of variable operational cost (VOC) and primary energy rate (PER), VOC optimization mode, and PER optimization mode. The primary energy consumption (PEC), PER, operational costs, and investment benefits of the DER system under different operation strategies of above three optimization modes are evaluated comparing with the buildings using conventional technologies. Results indicate that the VOC optimization mode provides the best combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) performance during flat periods by yielding the lowest PEC (133.78 kton/year) and operational cost (million $ 35.98/year), and the joint optimization mode shows the best performance during peak periods by producing the lowest PEC (80.42 kton/year) and similar low operational costs (million $ 21.74/year) to VOC optimization mode (million $ 20.89/year).

[1]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of a micro-steam CCHP cycle for a residential building , 2012 .

[2]  Long Wei-ding,et al.  An optimal sizing method for cogeneration plants , 2006 .

[3]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[4]  Abtin Ataei,et al.  Design and optimization of CCHP system incorporated into kraft process, using Pinch Analysis with pressure drop consideration , 2013 .

[5]  You-Yin Jing,et al.  Multi-objective optimization design and operation strategy analysis of BCHP system based on life cycle assessment , 2012 .

[6]  Zhiqiang Zhai,et al.  Performance comparison of combined cooling heating and power system in different operation modes , 2011 .

[7]  Fernando Sebastián,et al.  Environmental assessment of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems based on biomass combustion in comparison to conventional generation , 2013 .

[8]  Tuula Savola,et al.  Off-design simulation and mathematical modeling of small-scale CHP plants at part loads , 2005 .

[9]  Sheng Li,et al.  Multi-objective optimal operation strategy study of micro-CCHP system , 2012, Energy.

[10]  Hoseyn Sayyaadi,et al.  Application of the multi-objective optimization and risk analysis for the sizing of a residential small-scale CCHP system , 2013 .

[11]  Qiong Wu,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects , 2010 .

[12]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Multi-objective design optimization of a natural gas-combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture in a life cycle perspective , 2010 .

[13]  You-Yin Jing,et al.  Optimization of capacity and operation for CCHP system by genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[14]  Carlos Rodríguez Monroy,et al.  Distributed power generation in the United States , 2011 .

[15]  Zacharias B. Maroulis,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of a trigeneration plant , 2010 .

[16]  Edris Pouresmaeil,et al.  Distributed energy resources and benefits to the environment , 2010 .

[17]  Gh. Abdollahi,et al.  Multi-objective approach in thermoenvironomic optimization of a small-scale distributed CCHP system with risk analysis , 2011 .

[18]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  Energy optimization model for a CCHP system with available gas turbines , 2005 .

[19]  Y. M. Shi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of energy demands on performance of CCHP system , 2008 .

[20]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Evaluation of a turbine driven CCHP system for large office buildings under different operating strategies , 2010 .

[21]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Climate impact on the prime mover size and design of a CCHP system for the residential building , 2012 .

[22]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[23]  Nelson Fumo,et al.  Analysis of combined cooling, heating, and power systems based on source primary energy consumption , 2010 .

[24]  Hongwei Li,et al.  Thermal-economic optimization of a distributed multi-generation energy system¿A case study of Beijing , 2006 .