Effect of Head Position and Magnetic Resonance Sequence on Cochlear Implant–Related Artifact Size and Internal Auditory Canal Visibility

Hypothesis To assess whether cochlear implant (CI)–related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifact and visibility of the internal auditory canal (IAC) can be improved with head positioning and select MRI sequences. Background CI-related MRI artifact limits the use of CIs in otherwise good candidates because of the need for serial MRIs for monitoring of pathology. This most notably impacts patients with tumors of the cerebellopontine angle and IAC. Methods Two cadaver heads were implanted with either a Med-El CONCERT (fixed magnet) or SYNCHRONY (rotating magnet) device. Each head was imaged in a 1.5T scanner in 11 different positions. The SYNCHRONY-implanted head was also imaged in a 3.0T scanner in seven positions. Artifact size and IAC visibility (graded on a Likert scale) were measured for each head position by a neuroradiologist. Results The CONCERT CI produced significantly smaller artifact than the SYNCHRONY CI (effect size, 14.65 mm; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between CI models in regard to IAC visibility. No head positions were statistically significantly better than neutral position for minimizing artifact size or IAC visibility, although some positions resulted in significantly larger artifact (effect sizes, 2.1–14.3 mm; p < 0.05) or significantly poorer IAC visibility (effect size, 1.4; p < 0.01). The T2 three-dimensional (CISS/FIESTA) sequence demonstrated significantly smaller artifact than T1 sequences, whereas T1 sequences demonstrated significantly better IAC visibility than T2 sequences. Conclusion Head positioning and magnetic resonance sequence selection impact CI-related artifact size and IAC visibility.

[1]  H. Sudhoff,et al.  Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size , 2020, Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie.

[2]  S. Gubbels,et al.  First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[3]  H. Sudhoff,et al.  Effects of head position on cochlear implant MRI artifacts at 3 T in vivo , 2019, Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie.

[4]  M. Carlson,et al.  MR Imaging and Cochlear Implants with Retained Internal Magnets: Reducing Artifacts near Highly Inhomogeneous Magnetic Fields. , 2018, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  M. Javadpour,et al.  Signs and Symptoms of Acoustic Neuroma at Initial Presentation: An Exploratory Analysis , 2017, Cureus.

[6]  P. Camarata,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patient with a Novel MRI-Compatible Auditory Brainstem Implant , 2017, Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports.

[7]  Jeffrey D. Sharon,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  J. Vasama,et al.  Single-Sided Deafness: The Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life, Quality of Hearing, and Working Performance , 2015, ORL.

[9]  L. Leidolt,et al.  Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  A. Ernst,et al.  MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  I. Joubert,et al.  MRI Without Magnet Removal in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patients With Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Implants , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Artifacts caused by cochlear implants with non-removable magnets in 3T MRI: phantom and cadaveric studies , 2009, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[13]  R. Prost,et al.  Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Internal Magnet Strength in Med‐El Combi 40+ Cochlear Implants , 2004, The Laryngoscope.