Intervention minimized semi-autonomous control using decoupled model predictive control

This paper proposes semi-autonomous control that minimizes intervention considering driver's steering and braking intentions. The biggest challenge of this problem is how to fairly judge driver's intentions that appear differently in the lateral and longitudinal directions and how to minimize controller intervention. A decoupled model predictive control (MPC) and optimal intervention decision methods are proposed considering driver incompatibility. Several MPCs are designed first considering the fact that the driver can avoid obstacles either by braking or moving to the left or right lanes. The control input to avoid the collision is calculated for each MPC such that its intervention can be minimized reflecting the driver's intention. After driver incompatibility is formalized, the optimal input is selected to minimize the incompatibility among the paths that can avoid accidents. The proposed algorithm is validated in simulations where collision can be avoided while minimizing the intervention.

[1]  Arthur Richards,et al.  Fast model predictive control with soft constraints , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[2]  Sterling J. Anderson,et al.  Constraint-based planning and control for safe, semi-autonomous operation of vehicles , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  CVXGEN: a code generator for embedded convex optimization , 2011, Optimization and Engineering.

[4]  Hermann Winner,et al.  Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[5]  Michael Fitzharris,et al.  Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Kunsoo Huh,et al.  Development of an autonomous braking system using the predicted stopping distance , 2014 .

[7]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  J. Christian Gerdes,et al.  Shared Steering Control Using Safe Envelopes for Obstacle Avoidance and Vehicle Stability , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Philippe Chevrel,et al.  Shared Steering Control Between a Driver and an Automation: Stability in the Presence of Driver Behavior Uncertainty , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Andrew Snyder,et al.  NHTSA’s 2014 Automatic Emergency Braking Test Track Evaluations , 2015 .

[11]  J. Maciejowski,et al.  Soft constraints and exact penalty functions in model predictive control , 2000 .

[12]  Sören Hohmann,et al.  Steering driver assistance system: A systematic cooperative shared control design approach , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[13]  Bi-Cheng Luan,et al.  Development of Autonomous Emergency Braking control system based on road friction , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[14]  R. A. DeCarlo Linear Systems: A State Variable Approach With Numerical Implementation , 1989 .

[15]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Safe semi-autonomous control with enhanced driver modeling , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[16]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.